To the Editor:We applaud Vinson and Hoehn for eloquently demonstrating that the performance of sedation
assisted procedures in the emergency department (ED) does not necessarily require a 2
physician team. From a Canadian perspective, where single physician coverage in smaller EDs
is common, this has important implications in terms of efficiency of patient care,
reduction in the need for patient transfer and decreasing the time to definitive treatment
for ED patients. We would like to draw attention to a model of care practiced in Halifax,
Nova Scotia for over 15 years, using a team consisting of an advanced care paramedic (ACP)
and a single physician, the former to conduct the sedation, and the latter to do the
procedure.1 The skills of ACPs
complement specific supplementary training in Procedural Sedation and Analgesia (PSA) to
produce, in our opinion, expert ED sedationists, and our database of over 4000 safely
conducted PSAs attest to this. Although performing PSA is primary role of ACPs in our ED,
success with this has expanded our use of paramedics to a number of other ED tasks, freeing
up other staff to perform what they do best.2Campbell and Froese are to be commended for having designed and implemented an admirable
system of care for emergency department (ED) procedural sedation.1 Their one physician/one paramedic model is akin to our
one physician/one nurse model, as both employ specially trained and supervised personnel
to administer sedation medications and give all their skill and attention to monitoring
patient status during the procedure and throughout the recovery. The analysis they
published demonstrates that in their hands this approach to emergency sedation optimizes
patient care, promotes procedural efficiency, and ensures patient safety.1We also appreciate their emphasis on the generalizability of our shared one physician
model to the many EDs around the world where single-physician coverage occurs for some
portion of the day (or, more likely, night). In this very common setting a department
has to put available resources to their best use, having emergency personnel exercise
their respective training and skills in a complementary fashion. As Campbell and Froese
put it, this allows staff to perform “what they do best.” Emergency nurses (and advanced
care paramedics in the case of Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre in Halifax,
Nova Scotia) are experienced and facile in parenteral drug administration and careful
monitoring of cardiorespiratory parameters. Emergency physicians are trained and adept
at ordering the right medications for the situation, performing the necessary
procedures, and being prepared for rescue airway intervention if indicated.The safety of the one physician/one nurse model is further supported by its broad use in
non-acute care settings. We cited a number of references in our paper of its safe use by
gastroenterologists.2,3 Casting the net even wider, many
dentists in this country are trained to perform procedural sedation, and they include
propofol in their pharmacopeia.4 The
American Dental Association requires the presence of one additional person beyond the
dentist for moderate sedation and 2 additional persons for deep sedation and general
anesthesia.5 These ancillary
personnel are required only to have completed a Basic Life Support course for the
healthcare provider. Also, “when the same individual administering the deep sedation or
general anesthesia is performing the dental procedure, one of the additional
appropriately trained team members must be designated for patient monitoring.”5 And in the dental office, this monitor
is customarily a dental assistant, or occasionally a registered nurse.4 In fact, with additional training, the
dental assistant in some states is authorized to draw up and administer intravenous
agents for deep sedation under direct supervision of a dentist.6 Strangely, the same drug administration that is
entrusted to dental assistants is being questioned as unsuitable for sedation-trained
registered nurses who specialize in emergency care.7As the evidence suggests, a 2 person team is often all that is needed for
sedation-assisted procedures in emergency medicine. Studies show that the one
physician/one nurse-equivalent model is both safe and effective. And in these days of
limited resources and growing cost consciousness, this leaner approach has even more
going for it.
Authors: John J Vargo; Mark H DeLegge; Andrew D Feld; Patrick D Gerstenberger; Paul Y Kwo; Jenifer R Lightdale; Susan Nuccio; Douglas K Rex; Lawrence R Schiller Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2012-05-22 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Sam G Campbell; Kirk D Magee; George J Kovacs; David A Petrie; John M Tallon; Robert McKinley; David G Urquhart; Linda Hutchins Journal: CJEM Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 2.410
Authors: Samuel G Campbell; Sandra E Janes; Robert P MacKinley; Patrick C Froese; Susan Harris; Glen R Etsell; Donna A Warren; David A Stewart; Mark J Priest; Anil J Snook; David G Urquhart Journal: Healthc Manage Forum Date: 2012