PURPOSE: Catheters are associated with worse clinical outcomes than fistulas and grafts in hemodialysis (HD) patients. One potential modifier of patient vascular access (VA) use is patient preference for a particular VA type. The purpose of this study is to identify predictors of patient VA preference that could be used to improve patient care. METHODS: This study uses a cross-sectional sample of data from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS 3, 2005-09), that includes 3815 HD patients from 224 facilities in 12 countries. Using multivariable models we measured associations between patient demographic and clinical characteristics, previous catheter use and patient preference for a catheter. RESULTS: Patient preference for a catheter varied across countries, ranging from 1% of HD patients in Japan and 18% in the United States, to 42% to 44% in Belgium and Canada. Preference for a catheter was positively associated with age (adjusted odds ratio per 10 years=1.14; 95% CI=1.02-1.26), female sex (OR 1.49; 95% CI=1.15-1.93), and former (OR=2.61; 95% CI=1.66-4.12) or current catheter use (OR=60.3; 95% CI=36.5-99.8); catheter preference was inversely associated with time on dialysis (OR per three years=0.90; 95% CI=0.82-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Considerable variation in patient VA preference was observed across countries, suggesting that patient VA preference may be influenced by sociocultural factors and thus could be modifiable. Catheter preference was greatest among current and former catheter users, suggesting that one way to influence patient VA preference may be to avoid catheter use whenever possible.
PURPOSE: Catheters are associated with worse clinical outcomes than fistulas and grafts in hemodialysis (HD) patients. One potential modifier of patient vascular access (VA) use is patient preference for a particular VA type. The purpose of this study is to identify predictors of patient VA preference that could be used to improve patient care. METHODS: This study uses a cross-sectional sample of data from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS 3, 2005-09), that includes 3815 HDpatients from 224 facilities in 12 countries. Using multivariable models we measured associations between patient demographic and clinical characteristics, previous catheter use and patient preference for a catheter. RESULTS:Patient preference for a catheter varied across countries, ranging from 1% of HDpatients in Japan and 18% in the United States, to 42% to 44% in Belgium and Canada. Preference for a catheter was positively associated with age (adjusted odds ratio per 10 years=1.14; 95% CI=1.02-1.26), female sex (OR 1.49; 95% CI=1.15-1.93), and former (OR=2.61; 95% CI=1.66-4.12) or current catheter use (OR=60.3; 95% CI=36.5-99.8); catheter preference was inversely associated with time on dialysis (OR per three years=0.90; 95% CI=0.82-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Considerable variation in patient VA preference was observed across countries, suggesting that patient VA preference may be influenced by sociocultural factors and thus could be modifiable. Catheter preference was greatest among current and former catheter users, suggesting that one way to influence patient VA preference may be to avoid catheter use whenever possible.
Authors: Ahmed A Al-Jaishi; Charmaine E Lok; Amit X Garg; Joyce C Zhang; Louise M Moist Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-01-07 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Kenneth J Woodside; Sarah Bell; Purna Mukhopadhyay; Kaitlyn J Repeck; Ian T Robinson; Ashley R Eckard; Sudipta Dasmunshi; Brett W Plattner; Jeffrey Pearson; Douglas E Schaubel; Ronald L Pisoni; Rajiv Saran Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2018-02-09 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: T Suwabe; H Araoka; Y Ubara; K Kikuchi; R Hazue; K Mise; S Hamanoue; T Ueno; K Sumida; N Hayami; J Hoshino; A Imafuku; M Kawada; R Hiramatsu; E Hasegawa; N Sawa; K Takaichi Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2015-04-08 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Natalie Domenick Sridharan; Larry Fish; Lan Yu; Steven Weisbord; Manisha Jhamb; Michel S Makaroun; Theodore H Yuo Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2017-08-16 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Shih-Han S Huang; Jennifer MacRae; Dana Ross; Rameez Imtiaz; Brittany Hollingsworth; Gihad E Nesrallah; Michael A Copland; Philip A McFarlane; Christopher T Chan; Deborah Zimmerman Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-01-18 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Radojica V Stolić; Zoran Bukumiric; Vekoslav Mitrovic; Maja Sipic; Biljana Krdzic; Goran Relic; Gordana Nikolic; Sasa Sovtic; Naja E Suljkovic Journal: Med Princ Pract Date: 2020-10-29 Impact factor: 1.927
Authors: Bruce M Robinson; Tadao Akizawa; Kitty J Jager; Peter G Kerr; Rajiv Saran; Ronald L Pisoni Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-05-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Sabine N van der Veer; Maria C Haller; Carina A C M Pittens; Jacqueline Broerse; Clare Castledine; Maurizio Gallieni; Nicholas Inston; Anna Marti Monros; Niels Peek; Wim van Biesen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-07 Impact factor: 3.240