| Literature DB >> 23599015 |
Xesús Feás1, Leticia M Estevinho, Carmen Salinero, Pilar Vela, María J Sainz, María Pilar Vázquez-Tato, Julio A Seijas.
Abstract
Virgin oils obtained from seeds of Camellia oleifera (CO), Camellia reticulata (CR) and Camellia sasanqua (CS) were studied for their triacylglyceride composition, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. Levels of fatty acids determined by ¹H-nuclear magnetic resonance analysis were similar to those reported for olive oils (82.30%-84.47%; 5.69%-7.78%; 0.26%-0.41% and 8.04%-11.2%, for oleic, linoleic, linolenic and saturated acids, respectively). The CR oil showed the best antioxidant potential in the three in vitro models tested. With regard to EC₅₀ values (µg/mL), the order in DPPH radical-scavenging was CR (33.48) < CO (35.20) < CS (54.87). Effectiveness in reducing power was CR (2.81) < CO (3.09) < CS (5.32). IC₅₀ for LPO inhibition were 0.37, 0.52 and 0.75 µg/mL for CR, CO and CS, respectively. All the oils showed antimicrobial activity, and exhibited different selectivity and MICs for each microorganism tested (E. coli, B. cereus and C. albicans). B. cereus was the less sensitive species (MIC: 52.083 ± 18.042 for CO; 41.667 ± 18.042 for CR; 104.167 ± 36.084 for CS mg/mL) and the E. coli was the most sensitive to camellia oil's effect. The standard gentamicin presented higher MIC for E. coli (4.2) than the CR (MIC= 2.6) and CO (MIC = 3.9) oils.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23599015 PMCID: PMC6270245 DOI: 10.3390/molecules18044573
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 11H-NMR spectra (750 MHz for 1H) of C. oleifera (A), C. reticulata(B)and C. sasanqua (C) oils.
Levels (%) of fatty acid composition obtained for Camellia oils investigated.
| Virgin | 83.77 | 7.78 | 0.41 | 8.04 | 83.77 | 8.19 | 91.96 | 0.05 | 18.98 | 1.02 | 11.44 | 0.09 | PW * |
| Virgin | 84.47 | 5.69 | 0.26 | 9.58 | 84.47 | 5.95 | 90.42 | 0.05 | 21.88 | 0.62 | 9.44 | 0.11 | PW * |
| Virgin | 82.3 | 6.2 | 0.3 | 11.2 | 82.30 | 6.5 | 88.80 | 0.05 | 20.67 | 0.58 | 7.93 | 0.13 | PW * |
|
| 80.67 | 6.65 | 0.29 | 10.0 | 80.67 | 6.94 | 87.61 | 0.04 | 22.93 | 0.69 | 8.76 | 0.11 | [21] |
| Virgin olive | 80 | 5.9 | 0.7 | 13.4 | 80.00 | 6.60 | 86.60 | 0.12 | 8.43 | 0.49 | 6.46 | 0.15 | [22] |
| Olive | 77.5 | 7.4 | 0.7 | 14.4 | 77.50 | 8.10 | 85.60 | 0.09 | 10.57 | 0.56 | 5.94 | 0.17 | [22] |
| Hazelnut | 81 | 10.7 | nd | 8.3 | 81.00 | 10.70 | 91.70 | 0.00 | - | 1.29 | 11.05 | 0.09 | [22] |
| Corn | 33 | 51 | 0.7 | 15.3 | 33.00 | 51.70 | 84.70 | 0.01 | 72.86 | 3.38 | 5.54 | 0.18 | [22] |
| Sunflower | 29.2 | 58.8 | nd | 12 | 29.20 | 58.80 | 88.00 | 0.00 | - | 4.90 | 7.33 | 0.14 | [22] |
| Linseed | 20 | 17.1 | 54.2 | 8.7 | 20.00 | 71.30 | 91.30 | 3.17 | 0.32 | 8.20 | 10.49 | 0.10 | [22] |
| Avocado | 65 | 10 | 1 | 20 | 65.00 | 11.00 | 76.00 | 0.10 | 10.00 | 0.55 | 3.80 | 0.26 | [23] |
| Tea seed | 80 | 10 | <1 | 10 | 80.00 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | [23] |
| Pumpkin | 40.0 | 40.0 | <1 | 10.0 | 40.00 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | [23] |
| Soybean | 25.0 | 50.0 | 7.0 | 15.0 | 25.00 | 57.00 | 82.00 | 0.14 | 7.14 | 3.80 | 5.47 | 0.18 | [23] |
| Canola | 60.0 | 20.0 | 10.0 | 7.0 | 60.00 | 30.00 | 90.00 | 0.50 | 2.00 | 4.29 | 12.86 | 0.08 | [23] |
* Present work. Capric acid (C10:0); Palmitic acid (C16:0); Oleic acid (C18:1n9c+t); Linoleic acid (C18:2n6c); α-Linolenic acid (C18:3n3); Arachidic acid (C20:0); Eicosenoic acid (C20:1c). SFA: Saturated fatty acids (C10:0 + C16:0 + C20:0); MUFA: Monounsaturated fatty acids (C18:1n9c+t + C20:1c); PUFA: Polyunsaturated fatty acids (C18:2n6 + C18:3n3); TUFA: Total unsaturated fatty acids (∑MUFA +∑PUFA).
Values (mg/mL) obtained in the antioxidant activity assays (EC50 for DPPH radical-scavenging activity and reducing power, and IC50 for inhibition of lipid peroxidation) of Camellia oils tested.
|
| 35.20 ± 4.95 ab | 33.48 ± 7.65 a | 54.87 ± 8.78 c | 47.02 ± 2.98 bc |
|
| 3.09 ± 0.92 a | 2.81 ± 0.63 a | 5.32 ± 0.98 b | 30.11 ± 1.67 c |
|
| 0.52 ± 0.01 a | 0.37 ± 0.01 a | 0.75 ± 0.02 b | 3.24 ± 0.56 c |
In each column different letters mean significant differences (p < 0.05); Values for the standard Trolox in μg/mL.
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC, in mg/mL) for the studied microorganisms in the antimicrobial activity assays with Camellia oils.
| 52.083 ± 18.042 b | 41.667 ± 18.042 b | 104.167 ± 36.084 c | 5.08 ± 0.35 a 1 | |
| 20.833 ± 7.217 ab | 20.833 ± 7.217 ab | 29.167 ± 19.094 b | 0.65 ± 0.56 a 2 | |
| 3.917 ± 3.406 ab | 2.600 ± 1.125 ab | 5.883 ± 3.406 b | 4.22 ± 1.32 a 1 |
In each column different letters mean significant differences (p < 0.05). 1 Gentamicin and 2 amphotericin B in μg/mL.
Assignment of the signals of Camellia oils 1H-NMR spectra (750 MHz for 1H).
| I (t) –CH3 | t | 0.89–0.86 | |
| H (m) –CH2- | m | 1.35–1.23 | |
| G (m) –CH2–C–CO2– | m | 1.64–1.57 | |
| D (m) –CH2–CO2- | m | 2.02–1.98 | |
| E (m) –CH2–CO2– | m | 2.06–2.02 | |
| F (dt) –C–CH2–C=C– | dt | 2.33–2.28 | |
| C (t) –C=C–CH2–C=C– | t | 2.78–2.74 | |
| L (m) –C=C–CH2–C=C–CH2–C=C | m | 2.81–2.78 | |
| A (dd) –C–CH2–O–CO–C | dd | 4.15–4.06 | |
| B (dd) –C–CH2–O–CO–C | dd | 4.30–4.26 | |
| K (m) CH(–C–O–CO–C–)2 | m | 5.27–5.24 | |
| J (m) C–HC=CH–C | m | 5.37–5.30 |
Signal multiplicity: s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; m, multiplet; dt, doublet of triplets; dd, doublet of doublets. The signal number agrees with those in Figure 1.