| Literature DB >> 23598645 |
E O de Souza1, V Tricoli, C Bueno Junior, M G Pereira, P C Brum, E M Oliveira, H Roschel, M S Aoki, C Urginowitsch.
Abstract
The activation of competing intracellular pathways has been proposed to explain the reduced training adaptations after concurrent strength and endurance exercises (CE). The present study investigated the acute effects of CE, strength exercises (SE), and endurance exercises (EE) on phosphorylated/total ratios of selected AMPK and Akt/mTOR/p70(S6K1) pathway proteins in rats. Six animals per exercise group were killed immediately (0 h) and 2 h after each exercise mode. In addition, 6 animals in a non-exercised condition (NE) were killed on the same day and under the same conditions. The levels of AMPK, phospho-Thr(172)AMPK (p-AMPK), Akt, phospho-Ser(473)Akt (p-Akt), p70(S6K1), phospho-Thr(389)-p70(S6K1) (p-p70(S6K1)), mTOR, phospho-Ser(2448)mTOR (p-mTOR), and phospho-Thr(1462)-TSC2 (p-TSC2) expression were evaluated by immunoblotting in total plantaris muscle extracts. The only significant difference detected was an increase (i.e., 87%) in Akt phosphorylated/total ratio in the CE group 2 h after exercise compared to the NE group (P = 0.002). There were no changes in AMPK, TSC2, mTOR, or p70(S6K1) ratios when the exercise modes were compared to the NE condition (P ≥ 0.05). In conclusion, our data suggest that low-intensity and low-volume CE might not blunt the training-induced adaptations, since it did not activate competing intracellular pathways in an acute bout of strength and endurance exercises in rat skeletal muscle.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23598645 PMCID: PMC3854410 DOI: 10.1590/1414-431x20132557
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Med Biol Res ISSN: 0100-879X Impact factor: 2.590
Figure 1Phosphorylated/total ratio Akt, AMPK, TSC2, mTOR, and p70S6K1 protein expression for endurance exercise (EE; n = 6), strength exercise (SE; n = 6), and concurrent exercise (CE; n = 6) groups immediately after (0 h) and 2 h after exercise protocols. The traced line refers to the no exercise control group (NE; n = 6) (means ± SE). *P = 0.002 compared to the NE group [two-way ANOVA (F test = 4.406)].