BACKGROUND: Even though tooth agenesis is the most common developmental anomaly of the human dentition, its genetic background and pathogenic mechanism(s) still remain poorly understood. Syndromic and isolated forms of hypodontia have been described and can occur sporadically or in families. OBJECTIVES: We describe and analyse the hypo-/oligodontia phenotype variations in families. The index patient suffers from severe or mild hypodontia; case-parents/sib records are available. Furthermore, we aim to evaluate whether the different agenesis patterns in the pedigrees are predictive of mutations in specific genes based on reported genotype-phenotype associations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dental records and pedigrees were collected from 79 families. In 67 families, the index patient presented with oligodontia while in 12 families with hypodontia. The phenotype data of 66 oligodontia index patients were analysed with the Tooth Agenesis Code software. RESULTS: Nine families counted two members; one family counted three members affected with oligodontia. Twenty-four oligodontia families respectively had one (n = 17), two (n = 4), three (n = 2) or four (n = 1) additional family members presenting with hypodontia. Of the 77 oligodontia cases, two showed the same tooth agenesis pattern, while 75 patients showed unique tooth agenesis patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Despite familial aggregation and expected Mendelian segregation, the number of missing teeth in the familial hypo-/oligodontia phenotypes and the tooth agenesis patterns are highly variable between the affected family members. Therefore, we hypothesize that tooth agenesis is not (always) a simple monogenic condition, but additional genetic or environmental factors can modify the expression of the phenotype.
BACKGROUND: Even though tooth agenesis is the most common developmental anomaly of the human dentition, its genetic background and pathogenic mechanism(s) still remain poorly understood. Syndromic and isolated forms of hypodontia have been described and can occur sporadically or in families. OBJECTIVES: We describe and analyse the hypo-/oligodontia phenotype variations in families. The index patient suffers from severe or mild hypodontia; case-parents/sib records are available. Furthermore, we aim to evaluate whether the different agenesis patterns in the pedigrees are predictive of mutations in specific genes based on reported genotype-phenotype associations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dental records and pedigrees were collected from 79 families. In 67 families, the index patient presented with oligodontia while in 12 families with hypodontia. The phenotype data of 66 oligodontia index patients were analysed with the Tooth Agenesis Code software. RESULTS: Nine families counted two members; one family counted three members affected with oligodontia. Twenty-four oligodontia families respectively had one (n = 17), two (n = 4), three (n = 2) or four (n = 1) additional family members presenting with hypodontia. Of the 77 oligodontia cases, two showed the same tooth agenesis pattern, while 75 patients showed unique tooth agenesis patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Despite familial aggregation and expected Mendelian segregation, the number of missing teeth in the familial hypo-/oligodontia phenotypes and the tooth agenesis patterns are highly variable between the affected family members. Therefore, we hypothesize that tooth agenesis is not (always) a simple monogenic condition, but additional genetic or environmental factors can modify the expression of the phenotype.
Authors: Charlotte W Ockeloen; Kriti D Khandelwal; Karoline Dreesen; Alexander Hoischen; Carine E L Carels; Kerstin U Ludwig; Robert Sullivan; Iris A L M van Rooij; Michelle Thonissen; Steven Swinnen; Milien Phan; Federica Conte; Nina Ishorst; Christian Gilissen; Laury RoaFuentes; Maartje van de Vorst; Arjen Henkes; Marloes Steehouwer; Ellen van Beusekom; Marjon Bloemen; Bruno Vankeirsbilck; Stefaan Bergé; Greet Hens; Joseph Schoenaers; Vincent Vander Poorten; Jasmien Roosenboom; An Verdonck; Koen Devriendt; Nel Roeleveldt; Shalini N Jhangiani; Lisenka E L M Vissers; James R Lupski; Joep de Ligt; Johannes W Von den Hoff; Rolph Pfundt; Han G Brunner; Huiqing Zhou; Jill Dixon; Elisabeth Mangold; Hans van Bokhoven; Michael J Dixon; Tjitske Kleefstra Journal: Genet Med Date: 2016-03-10 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Jamila Ross; Willem Fennis; Nicole de Leeuw; Marco Cune; Annemieke Willemze; Antoine Rosenberg; Hans-Kristian Ploos van Amstel; Marijn Créton; Marie-José van den Boogaard Journal: Mol Genet Genomic Med Date: 2019-04-04 Impact factor: 2.183
Authors: Brian J Howe; Chandler Pendleton; Miyuraj Harishchandra Hikkaduwa Withanage; Christopher A Childs; Erliang Zeng; Arjen van Wijk; Ruurd Hermus; Carmencita Padilla; Jacqueline T Hecht; Fernando A Poletta; Iêda M Orioli; Carmen J Buxó-Martínez; Frederic Deleyiannis; Alexandre R Vieira; Azeez Butali; Consuelo Valencia-Ramirez; Claudia Restrepo Muñeton; George L Wehby; Seth M Weinberg; Mary L Marazita; Lina M Moreno Uribe; Xian-Jin Xie Journal: Dent J (Basel) Date: 2022-07-05