Literature DB >> 23598478

A global regulatory science agenda for vaccines.

Lindsay Elmgren1, Xuguang Li, Carolyn Wilson, Robert Ball, Junzhi Wang, Klaus Cichutek, Michael Pfleiderer, Atsushi Kato, Marco Cavaleri, James Southern, Teeranart Jivapaisarnpong, Philip Minor, Elwyn Griffiths, Yeowon Sohn, David Wood.   

Abstract

The Decade of Vaccines Collaboration and development of the Global Vaccine Action Plan provides a catalyst and unique opportunity for regulators worldwide to develop and propose a global regulatory science agenda for vaccines. Regulatory oversight is critical to allow access to vaccines that are safe, effective, and of assured quality. Methods used by regulators need to constantly evolve so that scientific and technological advances are applied to address challenges such as new products and technologies, and also to provide an increased understanding of benefits and risks of existing products. Regulatory science builds on high-quality basic research, and encompasses at least two broad categories. First, there is laboratory-based regulatory science. Illustrative examples include development of correlates of immunity; or correlates of safety; or of improved product characterization and potency assays. Included in such science would be tools to standardize assays used for regulatory purposes. Second, there is science to develop regulatory processes. Illustrative examples include adaptive clinical trial designs; or tools to analyze the benefit-risk decision-making process of regulators; or novel pharmacovigilance methodologies. Included in such science would be initiatives to standardize regulatory processes (e.g., definitions of terms for adverse events [AEs] following immunization). The aim of a global regulatory science agenda is to transform current national efforts, mainly by well-resourced regulatory agencies, into a coordinated action plan to support global immunization goals. This article provides examples of how regulatory science has, in the past, contributed to improved access to vaccines, and identifies gaps that could be addressed through a global regulatory science agenda. The article also identifies challenges to implementing a regulatory science agenda and proposes strategies and actions to fill these gaps. A global regulatory science agenda will enable regulators, academics, and other stakeholders to converge around transformative actions for innovation in the regulatory process to support global immunization goals.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23598478     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.10.117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  10 in total

1.  Collaborative studies on the development of national reference standards for potency determination of H7N9 influenza vaccine.

Authors:  Changgui Li; Kangwei Xu; Anwar Hashem; Ming Shao; Shuzhen Liu; Yong Zou; Qiang Gao; Yongchao Zhang; Liyong Yuan; Miao Xu; Xuguang Li; Junzhi Wang
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  The regulatory sciences for stem cell-based medicinal products.

Authors:  Bao-Zhu Yuan; Junzhi Wang
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of squalene-containing adjuvant in human vaccines.

Authors:  Million A Tegenge; Robert J Mitkus
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2013-08-04       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 4.  Enhancing vaccine safety capacity globally: A lifecycle perspective.

Authors:  Robert T Chen; Tom T Shimabukuro; David B Martin; Patrick L F Zuber; Daniel M Weibel; Miriam Sturkenboom
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 5.  Regulatory science accelerates the development of biotechnology drugs and vaccines by NIFDC.

Authors:  Zhenglun Liang; Qunying Mao; Yiping Wang; Changgui Li; Kai Gao; Junzhi Wang
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 7.163

Review 6.  Social engineering of societal knowledge in livestock science: Can we be more empathetic?

Authors:  R K Ravikumar; Devesh Thakur; Hardev Choudhary; Vivek Kumar; Amol S Kinhekar; Tushar Garg; K Ponnusamy; G R Bhojne; Vasanth M Shetty; Vipin Kumar
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2017-01-23

Review 7.  Build a Sustainable Vaccines Industry with Synthetic Biology.

Authors:  Richard I Kitney; Jennifer Bell; Jim Philp
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 19.536

8.  Regulatory science: The need for empowering Indian innovation.

Authors:  Amit Kumar Dinda
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 5.274

Review 9.  Increasing efficiency in vaccine Production: A primer for change.

Authors:  Ole Kristian Aars; Michael Clark; Nina Schwalbe
Journal:  Vaccine X       Date:  2021-06-16

Review 10.  Comparative Safety of Vaccine Adjuvants: A Summary of Current Evidence and Future Needs.

Authors:  Nikolai Petrovsky
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.606

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.