Literature DB >> 23598359

Experimental test of an eco-evolutionary dynamic feedback loop between evolution and population density in the green peach aphid.

Martin M Turcotte1, David N Reznick, J Daniel Hare.   

Abstract

An eco-evolutionary feedback loop is defined as the reciprocal impacts of ecology on evolutionary dynamics and evolution on ecological dynamics on contemporary timescales. We experimentally tested for an eco-evolutionary feedback loop in the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae, by manipulating initial densities and evolution. We found strong evidence that initial aphid density alters the rate and direction of evolution, as measured by changes in genotype frequencies through time. We also found that evolution of aphids within only 16 days, or approximately three generations, alters the rate of population growth and predicts density compared to nonevolving controls. The impact of evolution on population dynamics also depended on density. In one evolution treatment, evolution accelerated population growth by up to 10.3% at high initial density or reduced it by up to 6.4% at low initial density. The impact of evolution on population growth was as strong as or stronger than that caused by a threefold change in intraspecific density. We found that, taken together, ecological condition, here intraspecific density, alters evolutionary dynamics, which in turn alter concurrent population growth rate (ecological dynamics) in an eco-evolutionary feedback loop. Our results suggest that ignoring evolution in studies predicting population dynamics might lead us to over- or underestimate population density and that we cannot predict the evolutionary outcome within aphid populations without considering population size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23598359     DOI: 10.1086/668078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  10 in total

1.  Evolutionary responses to environmental change: trophic interactions affect adaptation and persistence.

Authors:  Jarad P Mellard; Claire de Mazancourt; Michel Loreau
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The relative importance of rapid evolution for plant-microbe interactions depends on ecological context.

Authors:  Casey P Terhorst; Jay T Lennon; Jennifer A Lau
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  How warp-speed evolution is transforming ecology.

Authors:  Rachael Lallensack
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Density-dependent selection closes an eco-evolutionary feedback loop in the stick insect Timema cristinae.

Authors:  Timothy E Farkas; Gabriela Montejo-Kovacevich
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Soil-mediated eco-evolutionary feedbacks in the invasive plant Alliaria petiolata.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Evans; Richard A Lankau; Adam S Davis; S Raghu; Douglas A Landis
Journal:  Funct Ecol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.608

6.  Demographic responses underlying eco-evolutionary dynamics as revealed with inverse modelling.

Authors:  Marjolein Bruijning; Eelke Jongejans; Martin M Turcotte
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.091

7.  Eco-Evolutionary Feedbacks and the Maintenance of Metacommunity Diversity in a Changing Environment.

Authors:  Aidan P Fielding; Jelena H Pantel
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Minimal overall divergence of the gut microbiome in an adaptive radiation of Cyprinodon pupfishes despite potential adaptive enrichment for scale-eating.

Authors:  Joseph Heras; Christopher H Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Self and non-self recognition affects clonal reproduction and competition in the pea aphid.

Authors:  Yang Li; Shin-Ichi Akimoto
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Performance in a novel environment subject to ghost competition.

Authors:  Karen Bisschop; Frederik Mortier; Dries Bonte; Rampal S Etienne
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 2.984

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.