BACKGROUND: Given the prevalence of obesity and associated chronic conditions among U.S. adults, wellness benefits are an increasingly popular approach to promoting weight loss. PURPOSE: The goal of the study was to assess overweight and obese adults' beliefs about the helpfulness of insurance coverage of weight loss-related benefits, their willingness to pay for such benefits, and whether these opinions differ by individuals' weight or health insurance type. METHODS: A national survey was fielded in 2012 among non-pregnant, overweight, and obese adults who had seen a primary care provider in the past year (n=600). Descriptive statistics summarized beliefs about which weight loss-related benefits would be helpful, willingness to pay for such benefits, and agreement about whether health insurers should be able to charge more to obese individuals. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to determine whether beliefs differed by weight category or health insurance type. Analyses were conducted in July 2012. RESULTS: The majority (83%) of respondents cited a specific benefit as helpful. Those with private health insurance had a higher probability (89%, 95% CI=86%, 93%) of endorsing any benefit as helpful relative to those with other types of health insurance. Being obese relative to overweight was associated with greater support (57% vs 39%, p<0.05) for preventing health insurers from charging higher premiums to obese individuals. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of overweight adults, a large proportion endorsed the value of weight loss-related benefits offered by health plans. However, only about one third were willing to pay extra for them, and half disagreed with the notion that health plans should charge more to obese individuals. Given evidence of their effectiveness, wellness benefits should be offered to all individuals.
BACKGROUND: Given the prevalence of obesity and associated chronic conditions among U.S. adults, wellness benefits are an increasingly popular approach to promoting weight loss. PURPOSE: The goal of the study was to assess overweight and obese adults' beliefs about the helpfulness of insurance coverage of weight loss-related benefits, their willingness to pay for such benefits, and whether these opinions differ by individuals' weight or health insurance type. METHODS: A national survey was fielded in 2012 among non-pregnant, overweight, and obese adults who had seen a primary care provider in the past year (n=600). Descriptive statistics summarized beliefs about which weight loss-related benefits would be helpful, willingness to pay for such benefits, and agreement about whether health insurers should be able to charge more to obese individuals. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to determine whether beliefs differed by weight category or health insurance type. Analyses were conducted in July 2012. RESULTS: The majority (83%) of respondents cited a specific benefit as helpful. Those with private health insurance had a higher probability (89%, 95% CI=86%, 93%) of endorsing any benefit as helpful relative to those with other types of health insurance. Being obese relative to overweight was associated with greater support (57% vs 39%, p<0.05) for preventing health insurers from charging higher premiums to obese individuals. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of overweight adults, a large proportion endorsed the value of weight loss-related benefits offered by health plans. However, only about one third were willing to pay extra for them, and half disagreed with the notion that health plans should charge more to obese individuals. Given evidence of their effectiveness, wellness benefits should be offered to all individuals.
Authors: Frederick P Rivara; Thomas D Koepsell; Jin Wang; Dennis Durbin; Kenneth M Jaffe; Monica Vavilala; Andrea Dorsch; Maria Roper-Caldbeck; Eileen Houseknecht; Nancy Temkin Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2011-01-28 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Sara N Bleich; Roland J Thorpe; Hamidah Sharif-Harris; Ruth Fesahazion; Thomas A Laveist Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Eric A Finkelstein; Marco daCosta DiBonaventura; Somali M Burgess; Brent C Hale Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Felipe Saia Tápias; Victor Henrique Oyamada Otani; Daniel Augusto Corrêa Vasques; Thais Zelia Santos Otani; Ricardo Riyoiti Uchida Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2021-05-06 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Kimberly A Gudzune; Wendy L Bennett; Lisa A Cooper; Jeanne M Clark; Sara N Bleich Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2014-06-19 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Michael H Tomasson; Mahmoud Ali; Vanessa De Oliveira; Qian Xiao; Yogesh Jethava; Fenghuang Zhan; Adam M Fitzsimmons; Melissa L Bates Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2018-11-16 Impact factor: 5.923