Literature DB >> 23597771

Usefulness of speckle tracking echocardiography in hypertensive crisis and the effect of medical treatment.

Mahboob Alam1, Lily Zhang, Mark Stampehl, Nasser Lakkis, Hisham Dokainish.   

Abstract

The acute impact of hypertensive crisis, and changes after treatment, on left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function using comprehensive echocardiography, including speckle tracking, has not been well characterized. Thirty consecutive patients admitted to the hospital from the emergency room with hypertensive crisis underwent Doppler echocardiography at baseline and after blood pressure optimization. The mean age of the patients was 54 ± 13 years, with 19 men (63%). The most common presenting symptoms included dyspnea (70%), chest pain (43%), and altered mental status (13%). Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures at presentation were 198 ± 12 and 122 ± 12 mm Hg, decreasing to 143 ± 15 and 77 ± 12 mm Hg (p <0.001 for both) after treatment. There was no significant change in LV ejection fraction between baseline and follow-up (48 ± 18% vs 46 ± 18%, p = 0.50); however, global longitudinal LV systolic strain (-10 ± 4% to -12 ± 4%, p = 0.01) and global systolic strain rate (-1.0 ± 0.4 vs -1.4 ± 0.6 s(-1), p = 0.01) significantly improved. Mean global early diastolic strain (-7.2 ± 4.0% to -9.4 ± 2.9%, p = 0.004) and early diastolic strain rate (0.3 ± 0.2 to 0.5 ± 0.4 s(-1), p = 0.05) also improved after treatment. On multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of LV longitudinal strain at follow-up were LV ejection fraction (p <0.001), heart rate (p = 0.005), systolic blood pressure (p = 0.04), and left atrial volume index (p = 0.05). In conclusion, as opposed to LV ejection fraction, LV systolic strain and strain rate were depressed during hypertensive crisis and significantly improved after medical treatment. LV diastolic function, assessed using conventional and speckle-tracking parameters, was also depressed and significantly improved after treatment.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23597771     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.03.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular hypertensive emergencies.

Authors:  D P Papadopoulos; E A Sanidas; N A Viniou; V Gennimata; V Chantziara; I Barbetseas; T K Makris
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Antihypertensive treatment improves left ventricular diastolic function in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Ku-Lin Li; Ru-Xing Wang; Min Dai; Juan Lu; Jing Xue; Xiang-Jun Yang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 3.  Cardiovascular Hypertensive Crisis: Recent Evidence and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Christos Varounis; Vasiliki Katsi; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; John Lekakis; Dimitris Tousoulis
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-01-10

Review 4.  Cardiac Complications of Hypertensive Emergency: Classification, Diagnosis and Management Challenges.

Authors:  Mohammed A Talle; Ellen Ngarande; Anton F Doubell; Philip G Herbst
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-08-17

5.  Strain analysis for the identification of hypertensive cardiac end-organ damage in the emergency department.

Authors:  Pavitra Kotini-Shah; Susana Cuadros; Felix Huang; Joseph S Colla
Journal:  Crit Ultrasound J       Date:  2018-11-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.