Literature DB >> 23597744

Structural reliability of road accidents reconstruction.

Wojciech Wach1.   

Abstract

Reconstruction of road accidents combines objective and subjective action. The former concerns science, the latter assessment of human behavior in the context of objective findings. It is not uncommon for experts equipped with an arsenal of tools to obtain similar results of calculations, but to present radically different conclusions about the cause of the accident. The use of sophisticated methods of uncertainty analysis does not guarantee improvement in quality of reconstruction, because, increasingly, the most serious source of reduced reliability of reconstruction is problems in logical inference. In the article the structure of uncertainty and reliability of accident reconstruction was described. A definition of reliability of road accident reconstruction based on the theory of conditional probability and Bayesian network, as a function of modeling, data and expert reliability (defined in the text) was proposed. The uncertainty of reconstruction was made dependent only on the uncertainty of the data. This separation makes it possible to conduct a qualitative and quantitative analysis of reconstruction reliability and to analyze its sensitivity to component parameters, independently of the uncertainty analysis. An example of calculation was presented. The proposed formalism constitutes a tool helpful to explain, among other things, the paradox of reliable reconstruction despite its uncertain results or unreliable reconstruction despite high precision of results. This approach is of great importance in the reconstruction of road accidents, which goes far beyond the analysis of a single, homogeneous subsystem.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23597744     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.02.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  3 in total

1.  Effectiveness of systems changes suggested by simulation of adverse surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Meghan E Garstka; Douglas P Slakey; Christopher A Martin; Eric R Simms; James R Korndorffer
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2015-12-01

2.  Methods for fusing uncertain results obtained from different models in accident reconstruction.

Authors:  Tiefang Zou; Fenglin He
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2020-01-27

3.  Digital Reconstitution of Road Traffic Accidents: A Flexible Methodology Relying on UAV Surveying and Complementary Strategies to Support Multiple Scenarios.

Authors:  Luís Pádua; José Sousa; Jakub Vanko; Jonáš Hruška; Telmo Adão; Emanuel Peres; António Sousa; Joaquim J Sousa
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.