Literature DB >> 23597624

Outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Impact of preoperative risk.

Marek Polomsky1, Xia He, Sean M O'Brien, John D Puskas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether purported benefits of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting are patient-specific within the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Database or dependent on center volume or operating surgeon.
METHODS: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Database was queried for all patients undergoing nonemergency, isolated coronary artery bypass between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2010, who had Predicted Risk of Mortality scores and participant/surgeon identifiers. Of these 876,081 patients ("all sites"), 210,469 underwent surgery at participant sites that had performed more than 300 off-pump and 300 on-pump coronary artery bypass operations during the 6-year study period ("high-volume sites"). Operative mortality, stroke, acute renal failure, mortality or morbidity, and prolonged postoperative length of stay were analyzed with conditional logistic models for all sites and for high-volume sites, stratified by participant center and surgeon, and adjusted for 30 variables that comprise the Society of Thoracic Surgeons coronary artery bypass grafting risk models.
RESULTS: Off-pump coronary artery bypass was associated with a significant reduction in risk of death, stroke, acute renal failure, mortality or morbidity, and postoperative length of stay compared with on-pump coronary artery bypass after adjustment for 30 patient risk factors in the overall sample. This held true within high-volume centers. In the overall sample, there was a significant (P < .05) interaction between off-pump coronary artery bypass and Predicted Risk of Mortality for death, stroke, acute renal failure, and mortality or morbidity.
CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump coronary artery bypass was associated with reduced adverse events compared with on-pump coronary artery bypass after adjustment for 30 patient risk factors and center and surgeon identity. Patients with higher Predicted Risk of Mortality scores had the largest apparent benefit.
Copyright © 2013 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23597624     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  12 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  David P Taggart
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 2.  Off-pump coronary surgery: current justifications.

Authors:  Haralabos Parissis; B C Ramesh; Bassel Al-Alao
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-09-11

Review 3.  Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting; is it Still Relevant?

Authors:  Chima K P Ofoegbu; Rodgers M Manganyi
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2022

4.  The future of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a North American perspective.

Authors:  Bobby Yanagawa; Rashmi Nedadur; John D Puskas
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  One-stage Hybrid Procedure for Patients with Valvular Pulmonary Stenosis and Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Jia-Ji Liu; Chang-Wei Ren; Wen-Hui Wu; Yong-Qiang Lai
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 2.628

6.  Sequential vein bypass grafting is not associated with an increase of either in-hospital or mid-term adverse events in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Fucheng Xiao; Jian Wang; Hengchao Wu; Hansong Sun
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 2.628

7.  Effects of Minimal Extracorporeal Circulation on the Systemic Inflammatory Response and the Need for Transfusion after Coronary Bypass Grafting Surgery.

Authors:  Mehmet Emre Elçi; Aydın Kahraman; Emre Mutlu; Cemil Selim İspir
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 1.866

8.  Short-term clinical outcomes after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting at a single Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

Authors:  Entela B Lushaj; Athanasia Schreiner; Besa Jonuzi; Abbasali Badami; Nilto DeOliveira; Lucian Lozonschi
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 1.637

9.  Off-pump versus On-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Frail Patients: Study Protocol for the FRAGILE Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Omar Asdrúbal Vilca Mejía; Michel Pompeu Barros Oliveira Sá; Maurilio Onofre Deininger; Luís Roberto Palma Dallan; Rodrigo Coelho Segalote; Marco Antonio Praça de Oliveira; Fernando Antibas Atik; Magaly Arrais Dos Santos; Pedro Gabriel Melo de Barros E Silva; Rodrigo Mussi Milani; Alexandre Ciappina Hueb; Rosangela Monteiro; Ricardo Carvalho Lima; Luiz Augusto Ferreira Lisboa; Luís Alberto Oliveira Dallan; John Puskas; Fabio Biscegli Jatene
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct

Review 10.  Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: 30 Years of Debate.

Authors:  Mario Gaudino; Gianni D Angelini; Charalambos Antoniades; Faisal Bakaeen; Umberto Benedetto; Antonio M Calafiore; Antonino Di Franco; Michele Di Mauro; Stephen E Fremes; Leonard N Girardi; David Glineur; Juan Grau; Guo-Wei He; Carlo Patrono; John D Puskas; Marc Ruel; Thomas A Schwann; Derrick Y Tam; James Tatoulis; Robert Tranbaugh; Michael Vallely; Marco A Zenati; Michael Mack; David P Taggart
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.