Literature DB >> 23597413

Ion range estimation by using dual energy computed tomography.

Nora Hünemohr1, Bernhard Krauss, Julien Dinkel, Clarissa Gillmann, Benjamin Ackermann, Oliver Jäkel, Steffen Greilich.   

Abstract

Inaccurate conversion of CT data to water-equivalent path length (WEPL) is one of the most important uncertainty sources in ion treatment planning. Dual energy CT (DECT) imaging might help to reduce CT number ambiguities with the additional information. In our study we scanned a series of materials (tissue substitutes, aluminum, PMMA, and other polymers) in the dual source scanner (Siemens Somatom Definition Flash). Based on the 80kVp/140SnkVp dual energy images, the electron densities ϱe and effective atomic numbers Zeff were calculated. We introduced a new lookup table that translates the ϱe to the WEPL. The WEPL residuals from the calibration were significantly reduced for the investigated tissue surrogates compared to the empirical Hounsfield-look-up table (single energy CT imaging) from (-1.0±1.8)% to (0.1±0.7)% and for non-tissue equivalent PMMA from -7.8% to -1.0%. To assess the benefit of the new DECT calibration, we conducted a treatment planning study for three different idealized cases based on tissue surrogates and PMMA. The DECT calibration yielded a significantly higher target coverage in tissue surrogates and phantom material (i.e. PMMA cylinder, mean target coverage improved from 62% to 98%). To verify the DECT calibration for real tissue, ion ranges through a frozen pig head were measured and compared to predictions calculated by the standard single energy CT calibration and the novel DECT calibration. By using this method, an improvement of ion range estimation from -2.1% water-equivalent thickness deviation (single energy CT) to 0.3% (DECT) was achieved. If one excludes raypaths located on the edge of the sample accompanied with high uncertainties, no significant difference could be observed.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bremsvermögen; Heavy ion therapy; Protonentherapie; Schwerionentherapie; WEPL; dual energy CT; proton therapy; stopping powers

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23597413     DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2013.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Med Phys        ISSN: 0939-3889            Impact factor:   4.820


  12 in total

1.  A linear, separable two-parameter model for dual energy CT imaging of proton stopping power computation.

Authors:  Dong Han; Jeffrey V Siebers; Jeffrey F Williamson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Tissue decomposition from dual energy CT data for MC based dose calculation in particle therapy.

Authors:  Nora Hünemohr; Harald Paganetti; Steffen Greilich; Oliver Jäkel; Joao Seco
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Empowering Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Through Physics and Technology: An Overview.

Authors:  Radhe Mohan; Indra J Das; Clifton C Ling
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 4.  Status and innovations in pre-treatment CT imaging for proton therapy.

Authors:  Patrick Wohlfahrt; Christian Richter
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Technical Note: On the accuracy of parametric two-parameter photon cross-section models in dual-energy CT applications.

Authors:  Dong Han; Mariela A Porras-Chaverri; Joseph A O'Sullivan; David G Politte; Jeffrey F Williamson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Determination of proton stopping power ratio with dual-energy CT in 3D-printed tissue/air cavity surrogates.

Authors:  Jerimy C Polf; Matthew M Mille; Sina Mossahebi; Haijian Chen; Paul Maggi; Huaiyu Chen-Mayer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Improved accuracy of relative electron density and proton stopping power ratio through CycleGAN machine learning.

Authors:  Jessica Scholey; Luciano Vinas; Vasant Kearney; Sue Yom; Peder Eric Zufall Larson; Martina Descovich; Atchar Sudhyadhom
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 4.174

8.  Feasibility of using megavoltage computed tomography to reduce proton range uncertainty: A simulation study.

Authors:  Yanle Hu; Xiaoning Ding; Jiajian Shen; Martin Bues; Wei Liu; Yixiu Kang; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 9.  Technical Principles of Dual-Energy Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Clinical Applications for Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Shailaja Sajja; Young Lee; Markus Eriksson; Håkan Nordström; Arjun Sahgal; Masoud Hashemi; James G Mainprize; Mark Ruschin
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-07-30

10.  Comparison of single and dual energy CT for stopping power determination in proton therapy of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Vicki Trier Taasti; Ludvig Paul Muren; Kenneth Jensen; Jørgen Breede Baltzer Petersen; Jesper Thygesen; Anna Tietze; Cai Grau; David Christoffer Hansen
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-04-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.