Literature DB >> 23597404

Prognostic values of bundle branch blocks for cardiovascular mortality in Japanese (24year follow-up of NIPPON DATA80).

Yasuyuki Nakamura1, Tomonori Okamura, Taku Inohara, Shun Kohsaka, Makoto Watanabe, Aya Higashiyama, Aya Kadota, Nagako Okuda, Takayoshi Ohkubo, Shin-ya Nagasawa, Katsuyuki Miura, Akira Okayama, Hirotsugu Ueshima.   

Abstract

AIMS: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is generally considered to be associated with a poorer prognosis in comparison with normal controls. However, there are some studies that showed no difference in prognosis of LBBB in comparison with normal controls. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We studied prognostic values of BBBs on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and total mortality using the NIPPON DATA80 database with a 24-year follow-up. At the baseline in 1980, data were collected on study participants, ages 30years and over, from randomly selected areas in Japan. We followed 9,090 participants (44% men, mean age 51). During the 24year follow-up, there were 886 CVD, and 2,597 total mortality cases. Among participants, 0.2% of them were in LBBB, 1.3% in RBBB, 4.3% in other ventricular conduction defect (VCD) groups. The multivariate-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) using the Cox model including biochemical and other ECG variables revealed that LBBB was significantly positively associated with CVD (HR=2.71, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.35-5.45, P=0.005), and total (HR=2.07, 95%CI: 1.26-3.39, P=0.004) mortality in men and women combined compared to participants without VCD. RBBB and other VCDs did not carry any significant risk for CVD or total mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: We found significant positive associations of LBBB with CVD and total mortality independent of confounding factors including other ECG changes.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23597404     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2013.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electrocardiol        ISSN: 0022-0736            Impact factor:   1.438


  4 in total

1.  Sex Differences in Biological Markers of Health in the Study of Stress, Aging and Health in Russia.

Authors:  Anna Oksuzyan; Maria Shkolnikova; James W Vaupel; Kaare Christensen; Vladimir M Shkolnikov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Associations between common ECG abnormalities and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Marc Meller Søndergaard; Jonas Bille Nielsen; Rikke Nørmark Mortensen; Gunnar Gislason; Lars Køber; Freddy Lippert; Claus Graff; Stig Haunsø; Jesper Hastrup Svendsen; Kristian Hay Kragholm; Adrian Holger Pietersen; Bent Struer Lind; Søren Pihlkjær Hjortshøj; Anders Gaarsdal Holst; Johannes Jan Struijk; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Steen Møller Hansen
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2019-05-21

3.  Independent Prognostic Value of Single and Multiple Non-Specific 12-Lead Electrocardiographic Findings for Long-Term Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Mitsuaki Sawano; Shun Kohsaka; Tomonori Okamura; Taku Inohara; Daisuke Sugiyama; Yasuyuki Shiraishi; Makoto Watanabe; Yasuyuki Nakamura; Aya Higashiyama; Aya Kadota; Nagako Okuda; Yoshitaka Murakami; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Akira Fujiyoshi; Katsuyuki Miura; Akira Okayama; Hirotsugu Ueshima
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Prognostic value and prevalence of complete right bundle branch block in an elderly population: a community-based 10-year prospective study.

Authors:  Sherri Shih-Fan Yeh; Ching-Yu Julius Chen; I-Chien Wu; Chih-Cheng Hsu; Tzu-Yu Chen; Wei-Ting Tseng; Feng-Cheng Tang; Chi-Chung Wang; Chung-Chou Juan; Hou-Chang Chiu; Huey-Ming Lo; Dun-Hui Yang; Jyh-Ming Jimmy Juang; Chao Agnes Hsiung
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 5.682

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.