Literature DB >> 23597359

Change in health insurance coverage in Massachusetts and other New England States by perceived health status: potential impact of health reform.

Satvinder S Dhingra1, Matthew M Zack, Tara W Strine, Benjamin G Druss, Eduardo Simoes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We examined the impact of Massachusetts health reform and its public health component (enacted in 2006) on change in health insurance coverage by perceived health.
METHODS: We used 2003-2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data. We used a difference-in-differences framework to examine the experience in Massachusetts to predict the outcomes of national health care reform.
RESULTS: The proportion of adults aged 18 to 64 years with health insurance coverage increased more in Massachusetts than in other New England states (4.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.5%, 5.6%). For those with higher perceived health care need (more recent mentally and physically unhealthy days and activity limitation days [ALDs]), the postreform proportion significantly exceeded prereform (P < .001). Groups with higher perceived health care need represented a disproportionate increase in health insurance coverage in Massachusetts compared with other New England states--from 4.3% (95% CI = 3.3%, 5.4%) for fewer than 14 ALDs to 9.0% (95% CI = 4.5%, 13.5%) for 14 or more ALDs.
CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the Massachusetts experience, full implementation of the Affordable Care Act may increase health insurance coverage especially among populations with higher perceived health care need.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23597359      PMCID: PMC3698751          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  22 in total

1.  Reliability and validity of measures from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).

Authors:  D E Nelson; D Holtzman; J Bolen; C A Stanwyck; K A Mack
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  2001

2.  Public health surveillance for behavioral risk factors in a changing environment. Recommendations from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Team.

Authors:  Ali H Mokdad; Donna F Stroup; Wayne H Giles
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2003-05-23

3.  A comparison of national estimates from the National Health Interview Survey and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Authors:  David E Nelson; Eve Powell-Griner; Machell Town; Mary Grace Kovar
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Estimates of health insurance coverage: comparing state surveys with the current population survey.

Authors:  Kathleen Thiede Call; Michael Davern; Lynn A Blewett
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Interest-group influence on the Patient Protection and Affordability Act of 2010: winners and losers in the health care reform debate.

Authors:  Jill Quadagno
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.265

6.  Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States.

Authors:  R Andersen; J F Newman
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc       Date:  1973

7.  Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter?

Authors:  R M Andersen
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1995-03

8.  A summary of the Rand Health Insurance Study.

Authors:  J P Newhouse
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Retest reliability of surveillance questions on health related quality of life.

Authors:  E M Andresen; T K Catlin; K W Wyrwich; J Jackson-Thompson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Healthy Days Measures - population tracking of perceived physical and mental health over time.

Authors:  David G Moriarty; Mathew M Zack; Rosemarie Kobau
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-09-02       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  6 in total

1.  Why We Should Not Be Indifferent to Specification Choices for Difference-in-Differences.

Authors:  Andrew M Ryan; James F Burgess; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act: Potential Changes in Receipt of Mental Health Treatment Among Low-Income Nonelderly Adults With Serious Mental Illness.

Authors:  Beth Han; Joe Gfroerer; S Janet Kuramoto; Mir Ali; Albert M Woodward; Judith Teich
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  A Randomized Clinical Trial Investigating the Effect of a Healthcare Access Model for Individuals with Severe Psychiatric Disabilities.

Authors:  E Sally Rogers; Mihoko Maru; Megan Kash-MacDonald; Mariah Archer-Williams; Lobat Hashemi; Judith Boardman
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2016-05-02

4.  The association between insurance type and cost-related delay in care: a survey.

Authors:  Sora Al Rowas; Michael B Rothberg; Benjamin Johnson; Joel Miller; Mohanad AlMahmoud; Jennifer Friderici; Sarah L Goff; Tara Lagu
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Effects of Massachusetts health reform on the use of clinical preventive services.

Authors:  Catherine A Okoro; Satvinder S Dhingra; Ralph J Coates; Matthew Zack; Eduardo J Simoes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Surveillance for Health Care Access and Health Services Use, Adults Aged 18-64 Years - Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2014.

Authors:  Catherine A Okoro; Guixiang Zhao; Jared B Fox; Paul I Eke; Kurt J Greenlund; Machell Town
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2017-02-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.