PURPOSE: To document the prevalence of multiple mobility device use among adults with multiple sclerosis (MS) (≥ 55 years) and examine the association between falls status (faller/non-faller) and the number of mobility devices used. METHODS: Cross-sectional data generated through telephone interviews with 353 participants was used for this secondary analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to address the first study purpose. Multiple device use was measured by the number of devices used, which ranged from 0 (never use a cane, walker, manual wheelchair, or power wheelchair/scooter) to 4 (use all four mobility devices at least some of the time). Logistic regression analysis was used to address the second purpose, with fall status used as the dependent variable (non-fallers [<1 per year] versus fallers [≥ 1 per year]). RESULTS: Just under 60% of participants reported the use of at least two mobility devices. For each additional mobility device used, the odds of being a faller increased by 1.47 times (95% CI = 1.14-1.90). CONCLUSION: Multiple mobility device use was common and the greater number of devices used, the greater the likelihood of being a faller. To prevent falls, this association requires further research to determine directionality.
PURPOSE: To document the prevalence of multiple mobility device use among adults with multiple sclerosis (MS) (≥ 55 years) and examine the association between falls status (faller/non-faller) and the number of mobility devices used. METHODS: Cross-sectional data generated through telephone interviews with 353 participants was used for this secondary analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to address the first study purpose. Multiple device use was measured by the number of devices used, which ranged from 0 (never use a cane, walker, manual wheelchair, or power wheelchair/scooter) to 4 (use all four mobility devices at least some of the time). Logistic regression analysis was used to address the second purpose, with fall status used as the dependent variable (non-fallers [<1 per year] versus fallers [≥ 1 per year]). RESULTS: Just under 60% of participants reported the use of at least two mobility devices. For each additional mobility device used, the odds of being a faller increased by 1.47 times (95% CI = 1.14-1.90). CONCLUSION: Multiple mobility device use was common and the greater number of devices used, the greater the likelihood of being a faller. To prevent falls, this association requires further research to determine directionality.
Authors: Douglas N Martini; Eline Zeeboer; Andrea Hildebrand; Brett W Fling; Cinda L Hugos; Michelle H Cameron Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2018-06-26 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Nora E Fritz; Ani Eloyan; Moira Baynes; Scott D Newsome; Peter A Calabresi; Kathleen M Zackowski Journal: Mult Scler Relat Disord Date: 2017-11-22 Impact factor: 4.339
Authors: Y Nilsagård; H Gunn; J Freeman; P Hoang; S Lord; Rajarshi Mazumder; Michelle Cameron Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 6.312