Literature DB >> 23597187

Laparoscopic transperitoneal ureterolithotomy: a single-center experience.

Hamidreza Nasseh1, Farshid Pourreza, Ehsan Kazemnejad Leyli, Tahereh Zohari Nobijari, Hamidreza Baghani Aval.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate success and complications of laparoscopic transperitoneal ureterolithotomy at our center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 2008 until September 2011, 33 patients, including 22 men and 11 women, with a mean age of 45.3 years (range, 19-67 years), underwent laparoscopic ureterolithotomy at our center. Locations of stones were the upper, middle, and lower ureter in 29, 1, and 3 patients, respectively. Ten patients had a history of previous abdominal or pelvic surgery. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy was performed via a transperitoneal approach. Complications and outcomes were evaluated.
RESULTS: Mean operation time was 85.48±15.11 minutes. Except for one stone migration and one conversion to open surgery, all the ureteral stones were extracted laparoscopically (94% success rate). A double J stent was inserted antegradely during the procedure and remained for about 1 month in all cases except in 1 patient in whom both antegrade insertion and ureteroscopic relocation were used. Postoperative hypercapnia was detected in a young patient, who recovered with conservative treatment. No visceral complication occurred. The mean hospital stay and the drain installation interval were 4.1 days (range, 3-9 days). The mean return to full activity was 11.91±4.65 days. Preoperative hydronephrosis resolved at follow-up ultrasonography (3 months later) in all patients except 2 cases, in whom intravenous pyelography showed no obstruction (memorial hydronephrosis).
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic transperitoneal ureterolithotomy is a safe and effective treatment modality for skilled surgeons and a convenient option for patients. Challenges, such as lower ureteral stones, redo cases, and antegrade double J stent insertion, can be overcome by experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23597187     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2012.0187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the management of proximal ureteral stones: A single center experience.

Authors:  Nadeem Iqbal; Yashfeen Malik; Utbah Nadeem; Maham Khalid; Amna Pirzada; Mehr Majeed; Hajra Arshad Malik; Saeed Akhter
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-05-01

2.  Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for proximal ureteral calculi in selected patients.

Authors:  Qingfeng Hu; Weihong Ding; Yuancheng Gou; Yatfaat Ho; Ke Xu; Bin Gu; Chuanyu Sun; Guowei Xia; Qiang Ding
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-12-08

3.  Large proximal ureteral stones: Ideal treatment modality?

Authors:  B Kadyan; V Sabale; D Mane; V Satav; A Mulay; N Thakur; S P Kankalia
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.