| Literature DB >> 23596481 |
Zheng Tan1, Xiaoming Shang, Li Li, Luobing Tian, Yi Ma, Yan Peng, Lingxi Gao.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to observe and investigate the clinical efficacy of an intravenous drip of isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) for the treatment of angina pectoris in coronary heart disease. A total of 102 patients with angina pectoris in coronary heart disease were divided into two groups. For the treatment group (n=51), 20 mg ISMN was added to 250 ml 0.9% normal saline and administered by intravenous drip for 14 consecutive days, twice daily. For the control group (n=51), 10 mg glyceryl trinitrate was added to 250 ml 0.9% normal saline and administered by intravenous drip for 14 consecutive days, twice daily. The clinical efficacy and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. The disease symptoms of the two groups were improved. Compared with the control group, the clinical efficacy and electrocardiogram examination results of the treatment group were significantly improved (P<0.05). The intravenous formulation of ISMN is an effective treatment for angina pectoris in coronary heart disease and it has the advantages of fewer adverse reactions and higher safety.Entities:
Keywords: angina pectoris; coronary heart disease; intravenous drip; isosorbide mononitrate
Year: 2013 PMID: 23596481 PMCID: PMC3628368 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2013.958
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Comparison of case information between the two groups ().
| Group | N (male/female) | Age (years | Disease course (years |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | 51 (23/28) | 47.6±7.0 | 5.3±1.6 |
| Control | 51 (24/27) | 46.5±8.6 | 5.6±1.2 |
mean ± SD.
Comparison of clinical efficacy between the two groups (P<0.005).
| Group | N | Extremely effective n (%) | Effective n (%) | Ineffective n (%) | Total effective rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | 51 | 26 (50.9) | 22 (43.1) | 3 (5.9) | 94.1 |
| Control | 51 | 15 (30.0) | 21 (41.2) | 15 (29.4) | 70.6 |
Comparison of efficacy between the two groups by electrocardiography (P<0.05).
| Group | N | Extremely effective n (%) | Effective n (%) | Ineffective n (%) | Total effective rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | 51 | 19 (37.3) | 26 (51.0) | 6 (11.8) | 88.2 |
| Control | 51 | 9 (17.6) | 24 (47.1) | 10 (19.6) | 64.7 |