BACKGROUND: The number of patients age >65 years with malignant gliomas is increasing. Prognosis of these patients is worse compared with younger patients. To determine biological differences among malignant gliomas of different age groups and help to explain the survival heterogeneity seen in the NOA-08 trial, the prevalence and impact of recently established biomarkers for outcome in younger patients were characterized in elderly patients. METHODS: Prevalences of mutations of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) and histone H3.3 (H3F3A), the glioma cytosine-phosphate-guanine island methylator phenotype (G-CIMP), and methylation of alkylpurine DNA N-glycosylase (APNG) and peroxiredoxin 1 (PRDX1) promoters were determined in a representative biomarker subset (n = 126 patients with anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma) from the NOA-08 trial. RESULTS: IDH1 mutations (R132H) were detected in only 3/126 patients, precluding determination of an association between IDH mutation and outcome. These 3 patients also displayed the G-CIMP phenotype. None of the IDH1 wild-type tumors were G-CIMP positive. Mutations in H3F3A were absent in all 103 patients sequenced for H3F3A. MassARRAY analysis of the APNG promoter revealed generally low methylation levels and failed to confirm any predictive properties for benefit from alkylating chemotherapy. Neither did PRDX1 promoter methylation show differential methylation or association with outcome in this cohort. In a 170-patient cohort from The Cancer Genome Atlas database matched for relevant prognostic factors, age ≥65 years was strongly associated with shorter survival. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an age-independent stable frequency of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter hypermethylation, tumors in this age group largely lack prognostically favorable markers established in younger glioblastoma patients, which likely contributes to the overall worse prognosis of elderly patients. However, the survival differences hint at fundamental further differences among malignant gliomas of different age groups.
BACKGROUND: The number of patients age >65 years with malignant gliomas is increasing. Prognosis of these patients is worse compared with younger patients. To determine biological differences among malignant gliomas of different age groups and help to explain the survival heterogeneity seen in the NOA-08 trial, the prevalence and impact of recently established biomarkers for outcome in younger patients were characterized in elderly patients. METHODS: Prevalences of mutations of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) and histone H3.3 (H3F3A), the glioma cytosine-phosphate-guanine island methylator phenotype (G-CIMP), and methylation of alkylpurine DNA N-glycosylase (APNG) and peroxiredoxin 1 (PRDX1) promoters were determined in a representative biomarker subset (n = 126 patients with anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma) from the NOA-08 trial. RESULTS:IDH1 mutations (R132H) were detected in only 3/126 patients, precluding determination of an association between IDH mutation and outcome. These 3 patients also displayed the G-CIMP phenotype. None of the IDH1 wild-type tumors were G-CIMP positive. Mutations in H3F3A were absent in all 103 patients sequenced for H3F3A. MassARRAY analysis of the APNG promoter revealed generally low methylation levels and failed to confirm any predictive properties for benefit from alkylating chemotherapy. Neither did PRDX1 promoter methylation show differential methylation or association with outcome in this cohort. In a 170-patient cohort from The Cancer Genome Atlas database matched for relevant prognostic factors, age ≥65 years was strongly associated with shorter survival. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an age-independent stable frequency of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter hypermethylation, tumors in this age group largely lack prognostically favorable markers established in younger glioblastomapatients, which likely contributes to the overall worse prognosis of elderly patients. However, the survival differences hint at fundamental further differences among malignant gliomas of different age groups.
Authors: Normand Laperriere; Michael Weller; Roger Stupp; James R Perry; Alba A Brandes; Wolfgang Wick; Martin J van den Bent Journal: Cancer Treat Rev Date: 2012-06-19 Impact factor: 12.111
Authors: Mathias Ehrich; Matthew R Nelson; Patrick Stanssens; Marc Zabeau; Triantafillos Liloglou; George Xinarianos; Charles R Cantor; John K Field; Dirk van den Boom Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-10-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Roger Stupp; Warren P Mason; Martin J van den Bent; Michael Weller; Barbara Fisher; Martin J B Taphoorn; Karl Belanger; Alba A Brandes; Christine Marosi; Ulrich Bogdahn; Jürgen Curschmann; Robert C Janzer; Samuel K Ludwin; Thierry Gorlia; Anouk Allgeier; Denis Lacombe; J Gregory Cairncross; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; René O Mirimanoff Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-03-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Monika E Hegi; Annie-Claire Diserens; Thierry Gorlia; Marie-France Hamou; Nicolas de Tribolet; Michael Weller; Johan M Kros; Johannes A Hainfellner; Warren Mason; Luigi Mariani; Jacoline E C Bromberg; Peter Hau; René O Mirimanoff; J Gregory Cairncross; Robert C Janzer; Roger Stupp Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-03-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tracy T Batchelor; Rebecca A Betensky; J Matthew Esposito; Loc-Duyen D Pham; Molly V Dorfman; Nicole Piscatelli; Sarah Jhung; David Rhee; David N Louis Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-01-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jeremy D Ruben; Michael Dally; Michael Bailey; Robin Smith; Catriona A McLean; Pasqual Fedele Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-03-06 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: D Williams Parsons; Siân Jones; Xiaosong Zhang; Jimmy Cheng-Ho Lin; Rebecca J Leary; Philipp Angenendt; Parminder Mankoo; Hannah Carter; I-Mei Siu; Gary L Gallia; Alessandro Olivi; Roger McLendon; B Ahmed Rasheed; Stephen Keir; Tatiana Nikolskaya; Yuri Nikolsky; Dana A Busam; Hanna Tekleab; Luis A Diaz; James Hartigan; Doug R Smith; Robert L Strausberg; Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie; Sueli Mieko Oba Shinjo; Hai Yan; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Rachel Karchin; Nick Papadopoulos; Giovanni Parmigiani; Bert Vogelstein; Victor E Velculescu; Kenneth W Kinzler Journal: Science Date: 2008-09-04 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Angelique E Sijben; John B McIntyre; Gloria B Roldán; Jacob C Easaw; Elizabeth Yan; Peter A Forsyth; Ian F Parney; Anthony M Magliocco; Hans Bernsen; J Gregory Cairncross Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2008-04-09 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Quinn T Ostrom; Haley Gittleman; Carol Kruchko; David N Louis; Daniel J Brat; Mark R Gilbert; Valentina I Petkov; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2016-07-14 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Pilar Mur; Ángel Rodríguez de Lope; Francisco Javier Díaz-Crespo; Teresa Hernández-Iglesias; Teresa Ribalta; Concepción Fiaño; Juan Fernando García; Juan Antonio Rey; Manuela Mollejo; Bárbara Meléndez Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2015-02-15 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Michael Youssef; Ethan B Ludmir; Jacob J Mandel; Akash J Patel; Ali Jalali; Jeffrey Treiber; Jimin Wu; Mary Frances McAleer; John F de Groot Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2019-10-23 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Tathiane M Malta; Camila F de Souza; Thais S Sabedot; Tiago C Silva; Maritza S Mosella; Steven N Kalkanis; James Snyder; Ana Valeria B Castro; Houtan Noushmehr Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2018-04-09 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Antje Wick; Tobias Kessler; Michael Platten; Christoph Meisner; Michael Bamberg; Ulrich Herrlinger; Jörg Felsberg; Astrid Weyerbrock; Kirsten Papsdorf; Joachim P Steinbach; Michael Sabel; Jan Vesper; Jürgen Debus; Jürgen Meixensberger; Ralf Ketter; Caroline Hertler; Regine Mayer-Steinacker; Sarah Weisang; Hanna Bölting; David Reuss; Guido Reifenberger; Felix Sahm; Andreas von Deimling; Michael Weller; Wolfgang Wick Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2020-08-17 Impact factor: 12.300