PURPOSE: Recent studies have demonstrated that patients who attend more cardiac rehabilitation (CR) sessions have lower subsequent mortality rates than those who attend fewer sessions. METHODS: We analyzed the impact of several phased-in policy and process changes implemented to increase patient participation in CR. In March 2010, our CR program changed from a policy of individualizing the recommended number of CR sessions per patient to a policy that recommended all 36 CR sessions. In October 2010, we introduced a 7-minute video describing the benefits of CR. In August 2011, we introduced a motivational program that rewarded patients after every sixth CR session. The number of CR sessions attended was determined through review of billing records. Enrollment and completion were defined as attending ≥1 session and ≥30 sessions, respectively. RESULTS: We identified 1103 patients sequentially enrolled in CR between May 2009 and January 2012. Overall, the median number of sessions per patient improved from 12 to 20 (P < .001). Completion rate improved from 14% to 39% (P < .001). The motivational program increased attendance by a median of 3 sessions per patient (P = .04), but this effect was limited to local CR participants. Financial analysis suggested that for every $100 spent on motivational rewards, patients attended an additional 6.6 (95% CI, -1 to 14) sessions of CR. CONCLUSIONS: Quality improvement activities significantly increased CR participation. Wide implementation of such programs may favorably impact patient participation in CR and potentially decrease the rate of subsequent cardiac events.
PURPOSE: Recent studies have demonstrated that patients who attend more cardiac rehabilitation (CR) sessions have lower subsequent mortality rates than those who attend fewer sessions. METHODS: We analyzed the impact of several phased-in policy and process changes implemented to increase patient participation in CR. In March 2010, our CR program changed from a policy of individualizing the recommended number of CR sessions per patient to a policy that recommended all 36 CR sessions. In October 2010, we introduced a 7-minute video describing the benefits of CR. In August 2011, we introduced a motivational program that rewarded patients after every sixth CR session. The number of CR sessions attended was determined through review of billing records. Enrollment and completion were defined as attending ≥1 session and ≥30 sessions, respectively. RESULTS: We identified 1103 patients sequentially enrolled in CR between May 2009 and January 2012. Overall, the median number of sessions per patient improved from 12 to 20 (P < .001). Completion rate improved from 14% to 39% (P < .001). The motivational program increased attendance by a median of 3 sessions per patient (P = .04), but this effect was limited to local CR participants. Financial analysis suggested that for every $100 spent on motivational rewards, patients attended an additional 6.6 (95% CI, -1 to 14) sessions of CR. CONCLUSIONS: Quality improvement activities significantly increased CR participation. Wide implementation of such programs may favorably impact patient participation in CR and potentially decrease the rate of subsequent cardiac events.
Authors: J I Robison; M A Rogers; J J Carlson; B E Mavis; T Stachnik; B Stoffelmayr; H A Sprague; C R McGrew; W D Van Huss Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 1992-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Kevin G Volpp; Andrea B Troxel; Mark V Pauly; Henry A Glick; Andrea Puig; David A Asch; Robert Galvin; Jingsan Zhu; Fei Wan; Jill DeGuzman; Elizabeth Corbett; Janet Weiner; Janet Audrain-McGovern Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-02-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tom G Briffa; Simon D Eckermann; Alison D Griffiths; Phillip J Harris; M Rose Heath; Saul B Freedman; Lana T Donaldson; N Kathryn Briffa; Anthony C Keech Journal: Med J Aust Date: 2005-11-07 Impact factor: 7.738
Authors: Cheuk-Man Yu; Chu-Pak Lau; June Chau; Sarah McGhee; Shun-Ling Kong; Bernard Man-Yung Cheung; Leonard Sheung-Wai Li Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Brandi J Witt; Steven J Jacobsen; Susan A Weston; Jill M Killian; Ryan A Meverden; Thomas G Allison; Guy S Reeder; Véronique L Roger Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-09-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Shannon M Dunlay; Brandi J Witt; Thomas G Allison; Sharonne N Hayes; Susan A Weston; Ellen Koepsell; Véronique L Roger Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2009-09-29 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Kevin G Volpp; Leslie K John; Andrea B Troxel; Laurie Norton; Jennifer Fassbender; George Loewenstein Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-12-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jose A Suaya; William B Stason; Philip A Ades; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Donald S Shepard Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-06-30 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Philip A Ades; Steven J Keteyian; Janet S Wright; Larry F Hamm; Karen Lui; Kimberly Newlin; Donald S Shepard; Randal J Thomas Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Marta Supervía; Jose R Medina-Inojosa; Colin Yeung; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez; Ray W Squires; Carmen M Pérez-Terzic; LaPrincess C Brewer; Shawn E Leth; Randal J Thomas Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2017-03-13 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Diann E Gaalema; Patrick D Savage; Jason L Rengo; Alexander Y Cutler; Stephen T Higgins; Philip A Ades Journal: Prev Med Date: 2016-02-15 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Diann E Gaalema; Patrick D Savage; Jason L Rengo; Alex Y Cutler; Rebecca J Elliott; Jeffrey S Priest; Stephen T Higgins; Philip A Ades Journal: J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 2.081
Authors: Quinn R Pack; Paul Visintainer; Michel Farah; Grace LaValley; Heidi Szalai; Peter K Lindenauer; Tara Lagu Journal: J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev Date: 2021-05-01 Impact factor: 2.081
Authors: Catherine X Wright; Sean Fournier; Yanhong Deng; Can Meng; Susan Hiller; Joyce M Oen-Hsiao; Rachel P Dreyer Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2022-05-02 Impact factor: 6.106