| Literature DB >> 23594763 |
Adriana Fuliaş1, Gabriela Vlase, Titus Vlase, Codruţa Soica, Alina Heghes, Marius Craina, Alina Heghes, Ionuţ Ledeti.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The thermal decomposition of cephalexine, cefadroxil and cefoperazone under non-isothermal conditions using the TG, respectively DSC methods, was studied. In case of TG, a hyphenated technique, including EGA, was used.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23594763 PMCID: PMC3668163 DOI: 10.1186/1752-153X-7-70
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Cent J ISSN: 1752-153X Impact factor: 4.215
Figure 1The chemical structures of the cephalosporin active substances.
Figure 2The thermoanalytical curves TG/DTG/DTA obtained in air at β=5°C·minfor the monohydrate active substances (a- cephalexin; b- cefadroxil; c- cefoperazone).
Figure 3The DSC curves obtained in air at four different heating rates for the monohydrate active substances (a- cephalexin; b- cefadroxil; c- cefoperazone).
Activation energy’s values obtained by Friedman isoconversional method for the three analyzed cephalosporins from DSC data (a) respectively TG data (b)
| 510.3 | 475.9 | 468.3 | 399.5 | 355.7 | 331.1 | 259.1 | 245.8 | 194.9 | 360.1 | |
| ±1.0 | ±0.5 | ±1.4 | ±2.8 | ±12.8 | ±3.6 | ±7.5 | ±9.9 | ±10.8 | ±37.4 | |
| 257.7 | 249.9 | 256.8 | 251.8 | 255.8 | 243.5 | 266.2 | 284.5 | 295.1 | 262.4 | |
| ± | ± | ± | ± | ± | ±7 | ± | ±5 | ±9 | ±5.6 | |
| 147.0 | 164.4 | 189.6 | 202.8 | 196.5 | 186.1 | 192.6 | 204.3 | 269.8 | 194.8 | |
| ±3.3 | ±2.8 | ±4.1 | ±1.7 | ±2.9 | ±6.2 | ±4.0 | ±9.1 | ±8.7 | ±11.2 | |
| 373.6 | 432.6 | 403.3 | 381.5 | 306.8 | 300.9 | 211.3 | 159.2 | 118.4 | 298.6 | |
| ±5.2 | ±3.9 | ±2.0 | ±1.3 | ±1.5 | ±13.2 | ±6.9 | ±13.2 | ±2.7 | ±37.5 | |
| 272.9 | 257.2 | 247.1 | 253.5 | 246 | 232.5 | 224.7 | 231.9 | 209.7 | 241.7 | |
| ±3.2 | ±7.4 | ±2.4 | ±13.6 | ±11.2 | ±33.6 | ±8.4 | ±9.6 | ±8.8 | ±6.3 | |
| 168.8 | 195.5 | 192.1 | 165.3 | 68.1 | 39.9 | 61.1 | 131.0 | 271.7 | 143.7 | |
| ±3.8 | ±4.1 | ±6.4 | ±3.9 | ±2.2 | ±8.6 | ±8.6 | ±3.3 | ±15.0 | ±25.3 | |
The activation energy values obtained by the KAS method for the three analyzed active substances utilised DSC data (a) respectively TG data (b)
| 283.1 | 283.3 | 283.2 | 287.1 | 284.1 | 286.5 | 283.0 | 285.8 | 290.8 | 285.2 | |
| ±5.5 | ±8.9 | ±3.3 | ±3.4 | ±7.4 | ±1.5 | ±4.5 | ±1.1 | ±2.2 | ±0.9 | |
| 236.7 | 247.1 | 249.6 | 250.2 | 251.4 | 254.4 | 261.4 | 264.6 | 270.8 | 254.0 | |
| ±17.3 | ±5.7 | ±2.3 | ±1.5 | ±0.3 | ±0.9 | ±1.8 | ±12.9 | ±2.4 | ±3.4 | |
| 171.8 | 192.5 | 188.0 | 189.6 | 189.0 | 190.7 | 173.2 | 182.6 | 179.8 | 184.1 | |
| ±5.5 | ±3.8 | ±3.7 | ±3.8 | ±3.8 | ±3.9 | ±2.4 | ±1.3 | ±0.6 | ±2.6 | |
| 389.2 | 379.9 | 366.7 | 370.9 | 363.2 | 354.2 | 340.7 | 338.6 | 336.2 | 359.9 | |
| ±2.7 | ±3.4 | ±1.8 | ±1.3 | ±1.8 | ±8.5 | ±4.4 | ±7.8 | ±4.4 | ±6.3 | |
| 242.7 | 240.2 | 231.0 | 224.7 | 213.6 | 239.9 | 240.4 | 243.0 | 257.1 | 236.9 | |
| ±1.2 | ±2.2 | ±7.6 | ±2.3 | ±4.1 | ±4.8 | ±18.5 | ±9.0 | ±19.3 | ±4.2 | |
| 221.3 | 186.4 | 182.7 | 178.5 | 165.8 | 170.2 | 148.6 | 140.8 | 141.9 | 170.7 | |
| ±8.6 | ±4.6 | ±3.9 | ±4.0 | ±2.6 | ±7.1 | ±3.3 | ±5.1 | ±1.9 | ±8.5 | |
Figure 4The reaction rate surfaces in the three-dimensional space with the coordinates (β·dα/dT; α; T) for the analysed cephalosporins.
Kinetic analysis for the three active substances, the NPK method
| 1 | 95.4 | 258.6±7.1 | 1.33·1027 | 1 | - | (1-α) | 264.5±9.8 | |
| (DSC data) [ | 2 | 4.6 | 385.4±83.8 | 1.07·1037 | - | 1/3 | α1/3 | |
| 1 | 77.2 | 220.2±9.7 | 8.04·1023 | 1 | - | (1-α) | 248.0±18.2 | |
| (DSC data) [ | 2 | 18.9 | 412.4±162.2 | 3.40·1045 | 5/3 | 1 | α5/3 · (1-α) | |
| 1 | 86.7 | 170.2±17.4 | 2.70·1018 | 2 | 1 | α · (1-α)2 | 179.9±14.9 | |
| (DSC data) | 2 | 13.3 | 243.8±17.6 | 7.18·1026 | 2 | 1 | α · (1-α)2 | |
| 1 | 93.9 | 226.7±8.3 | 4.95·1023 | 2 | 1 | α · (1-α)2 | 231.9±14.1 | |
| (TG data) | 2 | 4.5 | 428.1±40.3 | 7.88·1044 | - | 0.1 | α0.1 | |
| 1 | 84.0 | 181.2±13.2 | 7.37·1019 | 1 | - | (1-α) | 220.6±13.2 | |
| (TG data) | 2 | 16.0 | 411.9±75.4 | 5.10·1045 | 0.1 | - | (1-α)0.1 | |
| 1 | 71.4 | 141.5±6.0 | 9.16·1014 | 3 | - | (1-α)3 | 156.4±12.4 | |
| (TG data) | 2 | 22.5 | 245.6±83.6 | 5.80·1026 | - | 3 | α3 |
Figure 5The connections between the structure of the three active substances and EGA results.