Literature DB >> 23594552

Kin competition as a major driving force for invasions.

Alexander Kubisch1, Emanuel A Fronhofer, Hans Joachim Poethke, Thomas Hovestadt.   

Abstract

Current theory explains accelerating invasions with increased levels of dispersal as being caused by "spatial selection." Here we argue that another selective force, strong kin competition resulting from high relatedness due to subsequent founder effects at the expanding margin, is of at least comparable importance for dispersal evolution during invasions. We test this hypothesis with individual-based simulations of a spatially structured population invading empty space. To quantify the relative contribution of kin competition to dispersal evolution, we contrast two scenarios, one including kin effects and one excluding them without influencing spatial selection. We find that kin competition is a major determinant for dispersal evolution at invasion fronts, especially under environmental conditions that favor a pronounced kin structure (i.e., small patches, low environmental stochasticity, and high patch isolation). We demonstrate the importance of kin competition and thus biotic influences on dispersal evolution during invasions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23594552     DOI: 10.1086/670008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  10 in total

1.  Efficient mitigation of founder effects during the establishment of a leading-edge oak population.

Authors:  Arndt Hampe; Marie-Hélène Pemonge; Rémy J Petit
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Adaptation to fragmentation: evolutionary dynamics driven by human influences.

Authors:  Pierre-Olivier Cheptou; Anna L Hargreaves; Dries Bonte; Hans Jacquemyn
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  An empiricist's guide to theoretical predictions on the evolution of dispersal.

Authors:  Anne Duputié; François Massol
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  The genetic backburn: using rapid evolution to halt invasions.

Authors:  Ben L Phillips; Richard Shine; Reid Tingley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Parasite dispersal risk tolerance is mediated by its reproductive value.

Authors:  Maxcy P Nolan; Keith S Delaplane
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Genetic architecture of dispersal and local adaptation drives accelerating range expansions.

Authors:  Jhelam N Deshpande; Emanuel A Fronhofer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 12.779

7.  Eco-evolutionary feedbacks during experimental range expansions.

Authors:  Emanuel A Fronhofer; Florian Altermatt
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Inter-annual variability influences the eco-evolutionary dynamics of range-shifting.

Authors:  Roslyn C Henry; Greta Bocedi; Calvin Dytham; Justin M J Travis
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Evolving mutation rate advances the invasion speed of a sexual species.

Authors:  Marleen M P Cobben; Oliver Mitesser; Alexander Kubisch
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Artificial selection for timing of dispersal in predatory mites yields lines that differ in prey exploitation strategies.

Authors:  Alexandra M Revynthi; Dirk Verkleij; Arne Janssen; Martijn Egas
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 2.912

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.