| Literature DB >> 23593392 |
Jushan Liu1, Yuguang Bai, Eric G Lamb, Dale Simpson, Guofang Liu, Yongsheng Wei, Deli Wang, Daniel W McKenney, Pia Papadopol.
Abstract
Seed mass is an adaptive trait affecting species distribution, population dynamics and community structure. In widely distributed species, variation in seed mass may reflect both genetic adaptation to local environments and adaptive phenotypic plasticity. Acknowledging the difficulty in separating these two aspects, we examined the causal relationships determining seed mass variation to better understand adaptability and/or plasticity of selected tree species to spatial/climatic variation. A total of 504, 481 and 454 seed collections of black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.), white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) and jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb) across the Canadian Boreal Forest, respectively, were selected. Correlation analyses were used to determine how seed mass vary with latitude, longitude, and altitude. Structural Equation Modeling was used to examine how geographic and climatic variables influence seed mass. Climatic factors explained a large portion of the variation in seed mass (34, 14 and 29%, for black spruce, white spruce and jack pine, respectively), indicating species-specific adaptation to long term climate conditions. Higher annual mean temperature and winter precipitation caused greater seed mass in black spruce, but annual precipitation was the controlling factor for white spruce. The combination of factors such as growing season temperature and evapotranspiration, temperature seasonality and annual precipitation together determined seed mass of jack pine. Overall, sites with higher winter temperatures were correlated with larger seeds. Thus, long-term climatic conditions, at least in part, determined spatial variation in seed mass. Black spruce and Jack pine, species with relatively more specific habitat requirements and less plasticity, had more variation in seed mass explained by climate than did the more plastic species white spruce. As traits such as seed mass are related to seedling growth and survival, they potentially influence forest species composition in a changing climate and should be included in future modeling of vegetation shifts.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23593392 PMCID: PMC3623855 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061060
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Location of seed collections of black spruce, white spruce and jack pine.
Figure 2SEM for geographic variation of seed mass for black spruce, white spruce and jack pine.
Non-significant paths are indicated by dotted arrows. The thickness of the solid arrows reflects the magnitude of the standardized SEM coefficients. Standardized coefficients are listed beside each significant path, as is the variance explained (r2) for each endogenous variable. 1AT, Annual temperature (°C); 2TS, Temperature seasonality (%); 3AP, Annual precipitation (mm); 4PS, Precipitation seasonality (°C); 5AR, Annual radiation (mrem); 6EF, Total potential evaporation in the fall (August to November) (mm); 7RG, Mean radiation in growing season (April to September) (mrem); 8EG, Total potential evaporation of growing season (April to September) (mm); 9TG, Mean temperature of growing season (April to September) (°C); 10TRG, Temperature range of growing season (°C).
Correlation coefficients (r) between seed mass and latitude, longitude and altitude across and within ecozones for black spruce, white spruce and jack pine in the Canadian Boreal Forest.
| n | Black spruce | n | White spruce | n | Jack pine | ||
| Across ecozones | Latitude | 502 | −0.30*** | 482 | −0.10 | 454 | −0.04 |
| Latitude (control longitude) | −0.06 | 0.16*** | −0.32*** | ||||
| Latitude (control altitude) | −0.22*** | −0.07 | −0.05 | ||||
| Latitude (control longitude and altitude) | −0.07 | 0.15*** | −0.30*** | ||||
| Longitude | −0.36*** | −0.28*** | 0.18*** | ||||
| Longitude (control latitude) | −0.21*** | −0.31*** | 0.36*** | ||||
| Longitude (control altitude) | −0.24*** | −0.31*** | 0.23*** | ||||
| Longitude (control latitude and altitude) | −0.13*** | −0.34*** | 0.37*** | ||||
| Altitude | −0.39*** | −0.08 | <0.001 | ||||
| Altitude (control latitude) | −0.34*** | −0.03 | 0.03 | ||||
| Altitude (control longitude) | −0.30*** | 0.15*** | −0.14*** | ||||
| Altitude (control latitude and longitude) | −0.30*** | 0.15*** | −0.09 | ||||
| Atlantic Maritime | Latitude | 148 | 0.03 | 94 | −0.03 | 97 | 0.21** |
| Longitude | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.25** | ||||
| Altitude | −0.02 | −0.03 | 0.25** | ||||
| Boreal Shield | Latitude | 320 | −0.27*** | 274 | 0.08 | 272 | −0.38*** |
| Longitude | −0.56*** | −0.37*** | −0.16** | ||||
| Altitude | −0.36*** | −0.03 | −0.30*** |
p≤0.05, ** p≤0.01, *** p≤0.001.
Correlations across ecozones were evaluated with or without the effects of other spatial variables being controlled.
Figure 3Relationships between seed mass and significant climatic variables in SEM.
The climatic variables are annual mean temperature (a), precipitation seasonality (b), total potential evaporation in the fall (c) for black spruce (solid circle); annual precipitation (d) for white spruce (solid square); mean temperature of GS (growing season) (e) and total potential evaporation of GS (growing season) (f) for jack pine (solid triangle point-up).