| Literature DB >> 23593281 |
Xavier Lucas1, Silke Simon, Rolf Schubert, Stefan Günther.
Abstract
P-glycoprotein is capable of effluxing a broad range of cytosolic and membrane penetrating xenobiotic substrates, thus leading to multi-drug resistance and posing a threat for the therapeutic treatment of several diseases, including cancer and central nervous disorders. Herein, a virtual screening campaign followed by experimental validation in Caco-2, MDKCII, and MDKCII mdr1 transfected cell lines has been conducted for the identification of novel phospholipids with P-gp transportation inhibitory activity. Phosphatidylinositol-(1,2-dioctanoyl)-sodium salt (8∶0 PI) was found to significantly inhibit transmembrane P-gp transportation in vitro in a reproducible-, cell line-, and substrate-independent manner. Further tests are needed to determine whether this and other phosphatidylinositols could be co-administered with oral drugs to successfully increase their bioavailability. Moreover, as phosphatidylinositols and phosphoinositides are present in the human diet and are known to play an important role in signal transduction and cell motility, our finding could be of substantial interest for nutrition science as well.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23593281 PMCID: PMC3621910 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060679
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Homology model of human P-gp used in the molecular docking experiment.
Tube width and residue colouring depict sequence conservation, ranging from thin and blue (identity) to wide and red (null conservation). Compound 8∶0 PI upon binding to the substrate channel is shown in purple spheres. Location of P-gp in the cellular membrane and the TMDs and NBDs are indicted.
Phospholipid class distribution for the in silico results.
| Phospholipid class | Representatives in top 10% | Total amount in library |
|
|
| 5 | 28 |
|
|
| 2 | 58 |
|
|
| 1 | 29 |
|
|
| 0 | 9 |
|
|
| 9 | 21 |
|
|
| 1 | 18 |
|
|
| 0 | 15 |
|
| Total | 18 | 178 | – |
Classification in PA, PC, PE, PG, PI, and PS (phosphatidic acid, phosphatidylcholine, -ethanolamine, -glycerol, -inositol, and -serine, respectively). The statistical significance p of each observation is shown.
Probability p computed using the hypergeometric distribution.
Due to substructure-based searches, some of the phospholipid substitutions clearly differentiate from the main scaffolds.
indicates a statistical significance p<0.05.
indicates a statistical significance p<0.001.
Figure 2Candidate compounds selected for experimental validation.
a) Phosphatidylinositol-1,2-dioctanoyl-sodium salt, 8∶0 PI or PtdIns 8∶0-Na. b) Phosphatidylinositol-(5)-P1-1,2-dihexanoyl-disodium salt, 6∶0 PIP1 or PtdIns P1 6:0-Na. c) 1-Stearoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphate-sodium salt, 18∶0/18∶1 PA. d) 1,2-Dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphate-sodium salt, 14∶0 PA.
Figure 3Cryo-TEM screenshots of selected phospholipid formulations.
a) 18∶0/18∶1 PA vesicles in demineralised water, prepared via film method and ultra-sonication (15 min; 30 W); lipid conc. = 4.3 mM. b) 8∶0 PI ( = PtdIns 8∶0-Na) in demineralised water, prepared via film method and extrusion through polycarbonate membranes (21×80 nm pore size); lipid conc. = 1.0 mM.
Figure 4Apparent permeability (P app) ratio of digoxin transport in Caco-2 cells.
Digoxin flux was measured in pure HBSS pH 6.5 (Control) and after 30 min of pre-incubation with verapamil or liposomal formulations of phosphatidic acid and phosphatidylinositol derivatives in buffer (top and bottom, respectively); n = 3; results are given as mean+standard deviation (*: significance level: 0.05 compared to control; **: significance level: 0.01 compared to control).
Figure 5Calcein Accumulation Assay results.
Relative intracellular calcein fluorescence signal in MDCKII mdr1 and wild type (wt) cells (in grey and black, respectively) after pre-incubation with verapamil or 8∶0 PI ( = PtdIns 8∶0-Na) in HBSS with respect to the control (100% RF; calcein-acetoxymethylester in HBSS); n = 6; results are given as mean+standard deviation (*: significance level: 0.05 compared to control; **: significance level: 0.01 compared to control; ***: significance level: 10−3 compared to control).