Literature DB >> 23593246

Genomic sequence and virulence of clonal isolates of vaccinia virus Tiantan, the Chinese smallpox vaccine strain.

Qicheng Zhang1, Meijuan Tian, Yi Feng, Kai Zhao, Jing Xu, Ying Liu, Yiming Shao.   

Abstract

Despite the worldwide eradication of smallpox in 1979, the potential bioterrorism threat from variola virus and the ongoing use of vaccinia virus (VACV) as a vector for vaccine development argue for continued research on VACV. In China, the VACV Tiantan strain (TT) was used in the smallpox eradication campaign. Its progeny strain is currently being used to develop a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccine. Here we sequenced the full genomes of five TT clones isolated by plaque purification from the TT (752-1) viral stock. Phylogenetic analysis with other commonly used VACV strains showed that TT (752-1) and its clones clustered and exhibited higher sequence diversity than that found in Dryvax clones. The ∼190 kbp genomes of TT appeared to encode 273 open reading frames (ORFs). ORFs located in the middle of the genome were more conserved than those located at the two termini, where many virulence and immunomodulation associated genes reside. Several patterns of nucleotide changes including point mutations, insertions and deletions were identified. The polymorphisms in seven virulence-associated proteins and six immunomodulation-related proteins were analyzed. We also investigated the neuro- and skin- virulence of TT clones in mice and rabbits, respectively. The TT clones exhibited significantly less virulence than the New York City Board of Health (NYCBH) strain, as evidenced by less extensive weight loss and morbidity in mice as well as produced smaller skin lesions and lower incidence of putrescence in rabbits. The complete genome sequences, ORF annotations, and phenotypic diversity yielded from this study aid our understanding of the Chinese historic TT strain and are useful for HIV vaccine projects employing TT as a vector.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23593246      PMCID: PMC3625194          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Poxviruses are cytoplasm-replicating large double-stranded DNA viruses. Two of the best-known members of the family of Poxviridae are variola virus, the causative agent of smallpox, and vaccinia viruses (VACV), the smallpox vaccine strain. Smallpox was declared eradicated in 1979 by the World Health Organization (WHO) following a long, global vaccination campaign [1]. Despite smallpox eradication, studies on VACV remain relevant today. There is a continuing need for surveillance for potential smallpox outbreaks and bioterrorism acts using variola virus or other orthopoxviruses (OPVs) [2], [3], [4]. Furthermore, VACV has been employed to develop effective monkeypox vaccines [5], [6], [7]. The most widely used smallpox vaccine strain in China is the Temple of Heaven strain (also known as the Tiantan strain or VACV-TT). Its comparative strains are EM-63 in Russia, Lister/Elstree in Europe, New York City Board of Health (NYCBH)/Dryvax/Wyeth in the United States [8]. The most frequently studied VACV strain is Western Reserve (WR), a mouse brain passaged derivative of NYCBH [9], [10]. Virulence attenuation and immunogenicity improvement are important aspects of VACV based vaccine development [7], [11], [12]. Currently, there are 30 VACV genomes stored in the Viral Bioinformatics Resource Center (http://www.virology.ca). Several reports have illustrated the presence of genomic diversity in these earlier generations of smallpox vaccines. Qin et al., sequenced 11 clones isolated from Dryvax and revealed the presence of genetic diversity, with deletions in the right-hand inverted terminal repeat (ITR) [13]. Esposito et al., reported the presence of 573 single base polymorphisms and 53 insertions and deletions between the NYCBH/Dryvax clone Acam2000 and a more neurovirulent sister clone [14]. Garcel et al., showed that VACV-Lister also contained genotypic and phenotypic diversity [15] and shotgun sequencing of the genome of an unpurified Lister stock yielded more than 1,200 polymorphic sites [16]. The original TT strain was previously reported to have been isolated from skin lesions of a Chinese individual with smallpox in 1926 and had an attenuation history of passages in monkey, rabbit, bovine skin and rabbit testis [17]. TT had similar vaccination reaction characteristics as the contemporary Japanese cowpox strain and was used in the production of smallpox vaccine in China [17], [18], [19]. Originally, the TT vaccine was prepared from skin lesion materials after intracutaneous inoculations in calves. From 1969, it was produced in chicken embryo fibroblasts (CEF) cells and the TT (752-1) was a viral batch produced in 1975. The genomic sequence of a TT vaccine stock was determined and submitted to GenBank (accession number AF095689.1) in 1998. It was subsequently recognized that several sequencing errors existed [20]. Currently, an HIV candidate vaccine, rTV, uses TT as its vector [21]. It had completed a Phase I clinical trial and began a Phase II trial in 2012 (www.IAVI.org). In this study, we report the results from sequencing and virulence characterization of TT clones derived from TT (752-1).

Materials and Methods

Cells, Viruses, and Viral DNA Isolation

TT (752-1) was provided by the National Vaccine and Serum Institute, Beijing. NYCBH strain was provided by the AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program (Catalog number 3929) of the U.S. National Institutes of Health. Both viruses were grown in CEF prepared from 9 to 11 day-old embryonic chicken eggs and cultured in Eagle’s medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% L-glutamine, and 1% antibiotic at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. TT clones were isolated from TT (752-1) by plaque-purifications at terminal dilutions. Seven viral plaques were isolated and amplified by sequential four rounds of passages to produce enough material for sequencing [13]. Plaque images (Fig. S1) were processed with ImageJ (National Institutes of Health) [22]. Genomic DNA of each clone was extracted and purified using proteinase K digestion followed by phenol-chloroform extraction as described previously [23].

Genome Sequencing, Assembly, and Annotation

The genomes of TT clones were sequenced by Illumina Hiseq2000 Sequencer (Illumina Inc, CA) using shotgun sequencing of 500 bp paired-end sequencing library. Contigs were assembled and scaffolds were constructed using raw data with SOAP denovo and SOAP aligner (Beijing Genomics Institute) [24]. GenBank BLAST searches were performed for all scaffolds and sequences derived from the host genome were removed. The resulting alignments were analyzed by BioEdit (Ibis Bioscience, CA) and Contigexpress (Informax Inc, MD) to identify gaps between scaffolds. The average size of sequencing reads was 90 bp. Sequence gaps were present in the genome especially in ITRs. They were subsequently filled by polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing. Genome Annotation Transfer Utility (GATU) [25] was used to analyze ORFs in TT genomes using VACV-Copenhagen (Cop) as the reference. Orthologs and unassigned ORFs (i.e., ORFs that had no ortholog in Cop) were identified. ORFs shorter than 50 amino acids (aa) or without orthologous gene were excluded from the analysis. Unassigned ORFs of 50 aa or longer was categorized as OPVs genes according to the GenBank BLAST result with the highest similarity [26]. Viral Genome Organizer [27] was used to analyze the positions of individual genes. Sequences of ORFs with polymorphisms including frame-shift insertion or deletion among TT clones were further confirmed by Sanger sequencing. In cases where an ORF contained more than one start codon (ATG) near the 5′ terminal, BLAST was conducted to compare the orthologous sequences in other VACVs. The most frequently used ATG was selected as the tentative ORF in TT.

Phylogenetic Analysis

BioEdit was used to produce alignments of multiple genomes by Clustal W method [28], and Base-By-Base software (http://athena.bioc.uvic.ca/virology-ca-tools/base-by-base/) [29], [30] was used to trim the alignments and produce a visual summary of whole genome alignments. Phylogenetic analysis was carried out using the alignments of the conserved central region of 160.4 kb DNA sequences between the two ITRs starting from TT_025 and ending with TT_255. This region in TT corresponded with the orthologous region between C7L and B16R in Cop. Global gaps (the gap regions present in more than half of these aligned genomes) [31] were removed from the alignments. Phylogenetic analysis was performed using a maximum-likelihood analysis with general time-reversible (GTR) substitution model, subtree-prune-and-regraft (SPR) improvement, and 1000 bootstrap replicates (http://www.atgc-montpellier.fr/phyml/). The phylogenetic tree was visualized using Figtree (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/). MEGA 5 [32] was used to calculate pairwise distances between genomes by a Kimura 2-parameter substitution model including transition and transversion substitutions and pairwise-deletion treatment. The average values of pairwise distances between TT or Dryvax clones were calculated to illustrate the sequence diversity within these two groups of viruses. The standard deviation (σ) of each group was computed.

Genomic Sequence Orthology

To analyze the genomic sequence orthology among TT clones, a consensus sequence was first derived. TT11 had the highest similarity to the consensus sequence and was therefore chosen as the reference. ORFs of TT11 were compared with orthologous ORFs of four other TT clones and other VACV genomes to calculate the full-length nucleotide sequence similarity using GATU and DNAMan (Lynnon Corporation, Quebec, Canada).

Nucleotide Sequence Accession Numbers

The full genomic sequences of five TT clones were deposited in GenBank with accession numbers from JX489135 to JX489139. The OPVs used in this report and their GenBank accession numbers are listed in Table S1. TT-TW, a variant of TT (752-1) without plaque-purification was sequenced in this laboratory in 2010 (unpublished).

Mouse Brain Based Neurovirulence Determination

TT viruses and the NYCBH strain were serially diluted in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and then 3 x 102 plaque forming units (PFU) in 30 µl PBS were inoculated intracranially to groups of five 3-week old female BALB/c mice anesthetized with 1.25% 2,2,2-tribromoethyl alcohol. Body weights and mortality were recorded daily during the 12-day observation period.

Rabbit Skin Virulence Determination

TT clones and the NYCBH strain were serially diluted from 106 to 102 PFU/ml in PBS. For each viral dilution, two rabbits were tested. Each rabbit received two dorsal skin intradermal inoculations with 0.1 ml viral preparation per injection site. At day 4 post-infection (p.i.), the diameters of lesions were measured and the incidence of putrescence was recorded.

Ethics Statement

All experiments were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Laboratory Animal Center of Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention and NCAIDS. All procedures involving animal use and care were approved by the Institutional Committee on Laboratory Animals of NCAIDS.

Results

Clone Isolation and Genome Assembly

Seven randomly selected TT clones were isolated by plaque picking at the terminal dilution on CEF cells and amplified. The sizes of plaques varied after initial runs of plaque picking of each clone. No obvious difference was observed between the plaque sizes of the clones following passage and those of the original vaccine pool, although the average plaque sizes of TT9 and TT11 were significantly smaller (p<0.05) than those of TT7 and TT8 (Fig. S1). All seven viral genomic DNAs were sequenced and their contigs were assembled. All the assemblies were aligned with Cop and ListerV107 to accurately identify any gaps, particularly in highly repeated elements such as the ITRs. Five TT clones (TT8 to TT12) were successfully assembled and generated full genomic sequences of 189,366 to 191,144 bp. Two clones, TT6 and TT7 had small gaps in the two ITRs and thus did not yield full genomic sequences. We examined the phylogenetic relationship of various OPVs by maximum-likelihood method using alignments of the conserved 160.4 kb central region (i.e., the ITR sequences were excluded) (Fig.1). These sequences included five TT plaque-purified clones, TT-TW, and 25 other commonly known OPVs including 11 Dryvax clones DPPs (Table S1). Although TT6 and TT7 clones contained incomplete ITRs, the regions used in phylogenetic analysis were complete and thus were included in this analysis.
Figure 1

Phylogenetic analysis of TT and other OPV strains.

Phylogenetic relationships between TT-associated strains (including Tian Tan and TT-TW), TT clones (marked by *), and OPVs including 11 Dryvax clones (marked by #). Bootstrap values higher than 900 are shown. Names and GenBank accession numbers of the viral strains shown in this figure are listed in Table S1. The scale bar of branch length was shown under the phylogenetic tree.

Phylogenetic analysis of TT and other OPV strains.

Phylogenetic relationships between TT-associated strains (including Tian Tan and TT-TW), TT clones (marked by *), and OPVs including 11 Dryvax clones (marked by #). Bootstrap values higher than 900 are shown. Names and GenBank accession numbers of the viral strains shown in this figure are listed in Table S1. The scale bar of branch length was shown under the phylogenetic tree. Notably, TT clones clustered with a bootstrap value of 988 and shared a common ancestry with the TT genomic strain (AF095689.1) published in 1998 and another TT (752-1) derived TT-TW sequenced in 2010. Among the other VACVs, Cop was most similar to the TT cluster and HSPV-MNR76, NYCBH/Dryvax-derived DPP clones, Acam2000 and Duke exhibited least similarity. Among the analyzed OPV sequences, ectromelia virus strain Moscow (ECTV-Mos) was most distant from the TT cluster. All the Dryvax derived strains clustered as one group, including the Dryvax clones (DPPs), Acam2000 that were independently isolated from another stock of the same vaccine, and Duke that isolated from a patient experiencing a Dryvax vaccine-associated complication. The TT clones exhibited higher sequence diversity than the Dryvax clones. The average value of pairwise distances between TT clones was 0.00401 (σ = 0.00026) and the average value between Dryvax clones was 0.00294 (σ  = 0.00017).

Gene Annotations and Polymorphisms in Nucleotide Sequence

ORFs longer than 50 aa were initially annotated as genes and those without comparable orthologs in other OPVs were removed from annotation. Small ORFs that embedded in larger ORFs in the genomes of other poxviruses and those found to be truncated or split into two or more portions were removed from the ORF list and reclassified as “fragments”. Six such fragments were identified: TT_005.1, TT_028.1, TT_191.1, TT_210.1, TT_252.1, and TT_265.1. The genomic organizations of TT clones were identical to other sequenced VACVs. There were 255 unique ORFs in the genome and nine duplicated ORFs (TT_001 to TT_009 and TT_261 to TT_269) in ITRs. There are 273 ORFs found in each of the TT clones (Table S2), including orthologs of four additional conserved ORFs which were recently recognized in Cop and WR. These conserved ORFs have a “.5″ in their names. The orthology between TT clones was further assessed through the distribution of polymorphic sites. We first generated a consensus sequence using the most frequent nucleotide from each position. The similarities of each TT clone varied from 97.36% to 98.30% and TT11 had the highest similarity with the consensus (Fig. 2). The ORFs derived from TT11 were thus used as the reference for full-length ORF comparisons among TT clones (Table S3). Among the 273 annotated ORFs, the DNA sequences of 241 ORFs in four other TT clones had >95% identity with those in TT11. Conserved ORFs were located in the middle of the viral genome with gene functions related to viral replication and structure. For the remaining 32 ORFs, there was at least one clone displaying <95% identity with the reference ORF. More than 95% of the polymorphic ORFs exhibited length variations due to the acquisition of one or more point mutations, in-frame insertions or deletions. ORFs with relatively low similarity were located near ITRs where many virulence or immunomodulation-associated proteins reside.
Figure 2

Distribution of polymorphic sites in TT genomes.

The genomes were aligned by BioEdit and edited using Base-by-Base software. A consensus sequence was generated from TT8 to TT12 by Base-By-Base software. Sites in TT clones different from the consensus sequence are displayed in blue for nucleotide substitutions, green for insertions, and red for deletions. The extent of similarity (%) of each clone with the consensus sequence is displayed.

Distribution of polymorphic sites in TT genomes.

The genomes were aligned by BioEdit and edited using Base-by-Base software. A consensus sequence was generated from TT8 to TT12 by Base-By-Base software. Sites in TT clones different from the consensus sequence are displayed in blue for nucleotide substitutions, green for insertions, and red for deletions. The extent of similarity (%) of each clone with the consensus sequence is displayed. Table 1 summarizes the major ORF differences among TT clones and four reference VACVs including Cop, ListerV107, WR, and Acam2000. Four ORFs (TT_147, TT_185, TT_188, and TT_190) in the TT genomic sequences had orthologs in TT genome (AF095689.1) and thus were annotated, but corresponding sequences in the reference genomes were not annotated. Whether these ORFs code for functional proteins remains to be investigated. Two ∼4 kb regions in TT strains (ORF TT_011 to TT_019 and TT_184 to TT_190, encoding host defense modulators, ankyrin-like proteins, and A-type inclusion protein) had orthologous regions in Acam2000 and WR, but were absent in Cop. Conversely, the regions coding three ORFs (C19L, C20L and C21L) in the ITRs of Cop were absent in TT genomes.
Table 1

Gross differences in ORF size (nt) and complement.

Gene Size (bp)
Gene NameFunction DescriptionOrthologsTT8TT9TT10TT11TT12CopListerV107Acam 2000WR
VACV_TT_001 (ITR)a Chemokine binding proteinVACWR001/218, Cop-C23L/B29R720726720735729735777726735
VACV_TT_003 (ITR)TNF alpha receptor (CrmB)VACWR004/215, Cop-C22L/B28R438369438360429369369369369
VACV_TT_004 (ITR)Ankyrin-like proteinCop-C18L/B24R360360363453597453438597
VACV_TT_005 (ITR)Ankyrin-like proteinCop-C17L/B23R54073511345491140116112751149
VACV_TT_005.1 (ITR)Ankyrin-like proteinCop-C17L/B23R492
VACV_TT_006 (ITR)Unknown b Cop-C16L/B22R546546546546546546444546
VACV_TT_007 (ITR)UnknownCop-C15L/B21R210210210210210276270270
VACV_TT_008 (ITR)EGF growth factorVACWR009/210, Cop-C11R423426423426426429423420423
VACV_TT_009 (ITR)IL-1 receptor antagonistVACWR010/209, Cop-C10L996996996996996996996996996
VACV_TT_011Zinc finger-like protein, apoptosis, host defense modulatorVACWR011/208, VARBSH-D6R/005 c 252252363153252543252546
VACV_TT_012Zinc finger-like protein, apoptosis, host defense modulatorVACWR012/207, VARBSH-D6R/005189189189189189201189189
VACV_TT_013Soluble IL-18 binding protein (Bsh-D7L), host defense modulatorVACWR013, VARBSH-D7L/006381381381381381381375381
VACV_TT_014Ankyrin-like protein (Bang-D8L), 77 kDa cowpox host-range proteinVACWR014, CPXVBR-V024 d 273273273273273273714
VACV_TT_015Ankyrin-like protein (Bang-D8L), 77 kDa cowpox host-range proteinVACWR014, CPXVBR-V024429429933429429429429
VACV_TT_016Ankyrin-like protein (Bang-D8L), 77 kDa cowpox host-range proteinVACWR015, CPXVBR-V024192426414399408414
VACV_TT_017Ankyrin-like protein (Bang-D8L), 77 kDa cowpox host-range proteinVACWR016, CPXVBR-V024234234234234234234234234
VACV_TT_018Ankyrin-like protein (Bang-D8L), 77 kDa cowpox host-range proteinVACWR017, CPXVBR-V024216216216216216216216
VACV_TT_019UnknownVACV-Lister_VACV107-List015180180180180180180
VACV_TT_020Ankyrin-like proteinVACWR019, Cop-C9L190519051899190519051905190519051905
VACV_TT_022UnknownVACWR020, Cop-C8L534534534534534555534534534
VACV_TT_025Host range virulence factorVACWR021, Cop-C7L453453453453453453453453453
VACV_TT_026UnknownVACWR022, Cop-C6L456363456456456456456456456
VACV_TT_027Kelch-like proteinVACWR023, Cop-C5L615615561615615615615615615
VACV_TT_028IL-1 receptor antagonistVACWR024, Cop-C4L951570387594951951951189951
VACV_TT_028.1IL-1 receptor antagonistVACWR024, Cop-C4L189
VACV_TT_029Secreted complement binding proteinVACWR025, Cop-C3L792786786792792792792792792
VACV_TT_031Kelch-like proteinVACWR026, Cop-C2L153915391539153915391539153915211539
VACV_TT_032UnknownVACWR027, Cop-C1L675675675690675675675675690
VACV_TT_035Ankyrin-like proteinVACWR030, Cop-M1L141314131413141314131419141314101419
VACV_TT_036NF-κB inhibitorVACWR031, Cop-M2L663663663663663663663663663
VACV_TT_038Serpin (serine protease inhibitor) (SPI-3)VACWR033, Cop-K2L111011101110111011101110111011101110
VACV_TT_041IFN resistance, elF2 alpha-like PKR inhibitorVACWR034, Cop-K3L267267267267267267267267267
VACV_TT_043Monoglyceride lipaseVACWR037, Cop-K5L366366366366366411528411405
VACV_TT_044Monoglyceride lipaseVACWR038, Cop-K6L255246246255255246246246246
VACV_TT_046Apoptosis inhibitor (mitochondrial-associated)VACWR040, Cop-F1L723681681681681681681681681
VACV_TT_054UnknownVACWR046, Cop-F7L249249249243249279243243243
VACV_TT_059UnknownVACWR050, Cop-F11L106510651065106510651065106510471047
VACV_TT_063.5IMV proteinVACWR53.5150150150150150150
VACV_TT_065UnknownVACWR054, Cop-F15L477477477477477477477477444
VACV_TT_071IFN resistance, PKR inhibitorVACWR059, Cop-E3L573573573573573573573573573
VACV_TT_073Virosome componentVACWR061, Cop-E5R102610261026102610269969965701026
VACV_TT_080DNA polymeraseVACWR065, Cop-E9L302130213021302130213021302130183021
VACV_TT_086UnknownCPXVBR-078A189189189189189
VACV_TT_101.5RNA polymerase (RPO7)VACWR083, Cop-G5.5R192192192192192192192192192
VACV_TT_102Virulence factor, NIpC/P60 superfamily proteinVACWR084, Cop-G6R498498498498498498498498498
VACV_TT_109UnknownVACWR089, Cop-L2R258258258264258264264258264
VACV_TT_126UnknownCPXVBR-116183183183183183
VACV_TT_147UnknownVACV-TianTan-134219219219219219
VACV_TT_151.5Thioredoxin-like protein, S-S bond formation pathway proteinVACWR121, Cop-A2.5L231231231231231231231231231
VACV_TT_15439kDa core proteinVACWR123, Cop-A4L852852852846852846846846846
VACV_TT_162IMV Membrane proteinVACWR128, Cop-A9L300327312327327300300327327
VACV_TT_163P4a (precursor of core protein 4a)VACWR129, Cop-A10L267926792679267926792676267626762676
VACV_TT_168Structural proteinVACWR131, Cop-A12L576576579576576579579579579
VACV_TT_170.5IMV membrane protein, Virulence factorVACWR134, Cop-A14.5L162162162162162162162162162
VACV_TT_180Holliday junction resolvaseVACWR142, Cop-A22R564564564531564531564564564
VACV_TT_184Cowpox A-type inclusion proteinVACWR146639720639720465465
VACV_TT_185UnknownVACV-TianTan-171207207207207
VACV_TT_186Cowpox A-type inclusion proteinMPXV_USA2003_044_143 e 162162162162162
VACV_TT_187Cowpox A-type inclusion proteinVACWR147693693684684693684684
VACV_TT_188UnknownVACV-TianTan-173186186186186186
VACV_TT_189Cowpox A-type inclusion proteinVACWR1482178217821782178217821662178
VACV_TT_190UnknownVACV-TianTan-175183183183183183
VACV_TT_191P4c (precursor of core protein 4c)VACWR149, Cop-A26L1509150915096091509969150915031503
VACV_TT_191.1P4c (precursor of core protein 4c)VACWR149, Cop-A26L846
VACV_TT_198ATPase, DNA packaging proteinVACWR155, Cop-A32L903813813813813903903813813
VACV_TT_207UnknownVACWR161, VARGAR-A43R f 195195195195195189189189
VACV_TT_208UnknownVACV-REC_GLV_1h68-225g 183183183183183
VACV_TT_210SemaphorinVACWR163, Cop-A39R121268768777477412121212399888
VACV_TT_210.1SemaphorinVACWR164429468468468429429
VACV_TT_212C-type lectin-like type-II membrane proteinVACWR165, Cop-A40R480480480480480507480507480
VACV_TT_213Secreted virulence factorVACWR166, Cop-A41L660660660660660660660660660
VACV_TT_216UnknownVACWR169237237237237237237237
VACV_TT_217Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenaseVACWR170, Cop-A44L104110411041104110411041104110411041
VACV_TT_219IL-1 signaling inhibitorVACWR172, Cop-A46R723723723723723645723723723
VACV_TT_221UnknownVACWR173, Cop-A47L759759759759735735759735759
VACV_TT_222Thymidylate kinaseVACWR174, Cop-A48R684684684684684615684615684
VACV_TT_228Intracellular TLR and IL-1 signal inhibitorVACWR178, Cop-A52R573573573573573573573573573
VACV_TT_229UnknownCop-A54L273273273258
VACV_TT_230TNF receptor (CrmC)VACWR179, Cop-A53R399399561561399312561399312
VACV_TT_231UnknownVACV-Lister_VACV107-173180180180180180180
VACV_TT_232Kelch-like proteinVACWR180, Cop-A55R169516951695169516951695169516951695
VACV_TT_242Complement control, CD46, EEVVACWR187, Cop-B5R954954954954954954666954954
VACV_TT_247UnknownVACV-REC_GLV_1h68-269174174174174174
VACV_TT_250UnknownVACWR193, Cop-B11R231231231228219267219219219
VACV_TT_252Serpin 1,2,3VACWR195, Cop-B13R, Cop-B14R10083511008100810083513513811038
VACV_TT_252.1Serpin 1,2,3VACWR195, Cop-B13R, Cop-B14R6696696696691038
VACV_TT_255IL-1 beta receptorVACWR197, Cop-B16R873873873873873873981981981
VACV_TT_258Ankyrin-like proteinVACWR199, Cop-B18R172517251725172517251725124217251725
VACV_TT_259IFN alpha/beta receptorVACWR200, Cop-B19R1056106210561056106210627981056
VACV_TT_260Ankyrin-like proteinCop-B20R1809179444117941842384
VACV_TT_261 (ITR)IL-1 receptor antagonistVACWR010/209, Cop-C10L996996996996996996996
VACV_TT_262 (ITR)EGF growth factorVACWR009/210, Cop-C11R423426426426426420423
VACV_TT_263 (ITR)UnknownCop-C15L/B21R210210210210210276
VACV_TT_264 (ITR)UnknownCop-C16L/B22R546546546546546546444546
VACV_TT_265 (ITR)Ankyrin-like proteinCop-C17L/B23R54073511345491140116112751149
VACV_TT_265.1 (ITR)Ankyrin-like proteinCop-C17L/B23R492
VACV_TT_266 (ITR)Ankyrin-like proteinCop-C18L/B24R360360363453597453597
VACV_TT_267 (ITR)TNF alpha receptor (CrmB)Cop-C22L/B28R438369438360429369369369369
VACV_TT_268 (ITR)Chemokine binding proteinVACWR001/218, Cop-C23L/B29R720726720735729735777726735

Gross differences in ORF size (nt) and complement among TT clones and four VACVs (Cop, ListerV107, Acam 2000, and WR). a: ITR, inverted terminal repeat; b: genes with unknown functions; c: CPXVBR, Cowpox virus Brighton Red; d: VARBSH, Variola major virus Bangladesh; e: MPXV_USA2003_044, monkeypox virus strain USA2003_044; f: VARGAR, variola virus Garcia strain; g: VACV-REC_GLV_1h68, Vaccinia virus strain recombinant GLV-1h68 strain.

Gross differences in ORF size (nt) and complement among TT clones and four VACVs (Cop, ListerV107, Acam 2000, and WR). a: ITR, inverted terminal repeat; b: genes with unknown functions; c: CPXVBR, Cowpox virus Brighton Red; d: VARBSH, Variola major virus Bangladesh; e: MPXV_USA2003_044, monkeypox virus strain USA2003_044; f: VARGAR, variola virus Garcia strain; g: VACV-REC_GLV_1h68, Vaccinia virus strain recombinant GLV-1h68 strain. Several genes had polymorphic lengths because of the presence of substitution mutations. As shown in Fig. 3A, the length of ORF TT_210/210.1 (A39R, also known as semaphorin) in TT8 was the same as that in Cop and ListerV107 (1212 bp). In TT9 and TT10, a C685T mutation truncated this ORF to 687 bp and a T774A mutation truncated this ORF to 774 bp in TT11 and TT12 or 888 bp in WR. In another example, shown in Fig. 3B, the start codons for ORF TT_180 (A22R, Holliday junction resolvase) in TT11 and Cop were altered by a T-A mutation near the 5′ terminal and the next available start codon was 33 bp downstream. This change shortens the size of this ORF to 531 bp. Several polymorphisms were generated by insertions or deletions. One interesting example was the addition of copies of 6 bp repeats (ACAGAT) in TT_250 (B11R, function unknown) (Fig. 3C). In TT11, TT12, Acam2000, ListerV107, and WR, there was one copy of ACAGAT and in TT8, TT9, and TT10 there were three copies. Nine copies were present in Cop. In addition, in-frame insertions near the 3′ terminal of TT_162 (A9L, intracellular mature virion membrane protein) resulted in ORFs of 327 bp in TT11, TT9, TT12, Acam2000, and WR; 312 bp in TT10; and 300 bp in TT8, Cop, and ListerV107 (Fig. 3D). TT_230 (A53R, TNF receptor CrmC) in TT8, TT12, Cop, and WR consisted of a 16 bp frame-shift deletion near the 5′ end and a shift of start codon 16 bp upstream from the ones in TT11, TT9, TT10, Acam2000, and ListerV107 (Fig. 3E).
Figure 3

Representative nucleotide sequence polymorphisms in five ORFs among TT clones and four reference VACV genomes.

Nucleotide sequence polymorphisms in ORFs TT_210/210.1 (A39R) (A), TT_180 (A22R) (B), TT_250 (B11R) (C), TT_162 (A9L) (D), and TT_230 (A53R) (E) are shown. The TT11 clone with the highest sequence similarity to the consensus sequence was used as the reference. Altered nucleotides are shown in lower case. Nucleotides identical to TT11 are denoted with “–” and nucleotides not present in TT11 or other strains are denoted with dots. ###: start codon, ***: stop codon, R: 6-bp nucleotide repeat, numbers in parenthesis: nucleotide length of the ORF.

Representative nucleotide sequence polymorphisms in five ORFs among TT clones and four reference VACV genomes.

Nucleotide sequence polymorphisms in ORFs TT_210/210.1 (A39R) (A), TT_180 (A22R) (B), TT_250 (B11R) (C), TT_162 (A9L) (D), and TT_230 (A53R) (E) are shown. The TT11 clone with the highest sequence similarity to the consensus sequence was used as the reference. Altered nucleotides are shown in lower case. Nucleotides identical to TT11 are denoted with “–” and nucleotides not present in TT11 or other strains are denoted with dots. ###: start codon, ***: stop codon, R: 6-bp nucleotide repeat, numbers in parenthesis: nucleotide length of the ORF.

Polymorphisms in Virulence Reaction Associated Proteins

VACV contains more than 200 genes, some of which have been previously reported to be associated with viral virulence and immunomodulation. We selected seven virulence reaction-associated genes from TT clones and Acam2000 for amino acid sequence comparison (Table 2). Acam2000 was a clonal Vero cell culture vaccinia virus derived from NYCBH/Dryvax, and its relative gene sequences were selected to represent those of the NYCBH strain used in the our study. TT_213 (A41L) was a secreted virulence factor and its deletion was reported to result in severe lesions and increased viral clearance in the mouse skin model [33]. Six amino acid polymorphic sites were found in TT clones and Acam2000. TT clones displayed a substitution mutation, K122E, located in the chemokine binding protein superfamily conserved domain. The change from alkaline lysine (K) to glutamic acid (E) residue might be associated with the attenuation of TT. Seven polymorphic sites were found in TT_242 (B5R) among TT clones. B5R was a type I integral membrane glycoprotein and extracellular enveloped virion (EEV) complement control protein which blocked complement activation and associated inflammatory responses. Destruction of B5R was reported to contribute to attenuation of VACV [16], [34]. There were three substitution mutations among TT clones and Acam2000, L55S, V82I and I153M. L55S changed the polarity of the amino acid.
Table 2

Mutations identified in the seven virulence-associated proteins.

Gene NameProtein Size (aa)Protein Function (Ortholog in Cop)Non-Synonymous sitea Acam2000TT8TT9TT10TT11TT12
TT_025150Host range virulence factor31K b K31R
(Cop-C7L)38DD38GD38G
41KK41Q
130NN130T
TT_102165Virulence factor, NIpC/P60,90NN90DN90DN90DN90DN90D
superfamily protein (Cop-G6R)105NN105DN105D
115EE115DE115DE115DE115DE115D
122II122VI122VI122VI122VI122V
123DD123ED123ED123ED123ED123E
TT_170.553IMV membrane protein, virulence factor (Cop-A14.5L)52AA52VA52V
TT_213219Secreted virulence factor5LL5VL5V
(Cop-A41L)7II7VI7V
47HH47P c H47PH47PH47P
122KK122EK122EK122EK122EK122E
160DD160N
178AA178T c A178TA178TA178T
TT_242317Complement control, CD46,40NN40DN40DN40DN40D
EEV (Cop-B5R)41NN41KN41KN41KN41K
55LL55S c L55SL55SL55SL55S
82VV82IV82IV82IV82IV82I
140CC140YC140YC140Y
153II153MI153MI153MI153MI153M
216II216T c I216T
TT_245182Virulence, ER resident15LL15VL15V
(Cop-B7R)104RR104KR104KR104KR104K
168DD168N-
TT_24877Virulence factor (Cop-B9R)54RR54L c -
59GG59E-

Mutations identified in the seven virulence-associated proteins in five TT clones and Acam2000. Acam 2000 is used as the reference. Amino acid (aa) in TT clones identical to the reference is shown as “–”. a: amino acid position in Acam2000; b: single letter aa code; c: aa mutation resulted in polarity change. Abbreviations, IMV: intracellular mature virion, EEV: extracellular enveloped virion, ER: endoplasmic reticulum.

Mutations identified in the seven virulence-associated proteins in five TT clones and Acam2000. Acam 2000 is used as the reference. Amino acid (aa) in TT clones identical to the reference is shown as “–”. a: amino acid position in Acam2000; b: single letter aa code; c: aa mutation resulted in polarity change. Abbreviations, IMV: intracellular mature virion, EEV: extracellular enveloped virion, ER: endoplasmic reticulum. Six immunomodulation-associated genes were also selected for closer examination (Fig. 4). TT_210 (A39R) encoded a semaphorin influencing the outcome of dermal infection and, when truncated, the protein product could not be exported extracellularly [35]. Presence of a stop codon in the central sema domain yielded a truncated product of 228 aa in TT9 and TT10; and 257 aa in TT11 and TT12 (Fig. 4A). Truncation of the protein was also observed in Acam2000, with a product of 134 aa. TT_255 (B16R) encoded an IL-1 beta receptor. It was 290 aa in length in Cop and all five TT strains. It was longer in Acam2000 due to the presence of additional N-terminal 36 aa (Fig. 4B). TT_259 (B19R) encoded interferon-α/β receptor. In Cop, TT9, and TT12, it was 352 aa in length. There was a 2-aa deletion (Ser-Leu) in TT8, TT9, and TT10 near the N-terminus (Fig. 4C). In Acam2000, B19R was 265 aa and lost the immunoglobulin domain near the C-terminal. TT_028 (C4L) encoded IL-1 receptor antagonist and was 316 aa in length in Cop, TT8, and TT12 (Fig. 4D). It was shorter in TT9, TT10 and TT11 due to the deletion of 120 aa in N-terminal. In Acam2000, C4L was split into three fragments. TT_230 (A53R) encoded TNF receptor (CrmC) and its length differed greatly among these genomes (Fig. 4E). It was 102 aa in Cop and was 30 aa longer in TT8, TT9, TT12, and Acam2000. In TT10 and TT11, there was a 84 aa elongation in the C-terminal. Two forms of N-terminal sequences were present in A53R as described earlier. TT_252 (B13R) encoded serine protease inhibitors (Serpin 1, 2, 3) and was 116 aa in length in both Cop and TT9 (Fig. 4F). It was 335 aa in four other TT clones due to the presence of additional C terminal 219 aa. In Acam2000 it was 126 aa due to the presence of an additional N-terminal 10 aa.
Figure 4

Major polymorphisms within immunomodulation-associated proteins in TT clones, Acam2000, and Cop.

Six proteins previously known to be associated with immunomodulation were selected for comparison using Cop as the reference strain. These proteins are A39R encoding semaphorin (A), B16R encoding an IL-1 beta receptor (B), B19R encoding a soluble and cell-surface interferon- α/β receptor (C), C4L encoding an IL-1 receptor antagonist (D), A53R encoding TNF receptor CrmC (E), and B13R encoding serine protease inhibitors (Serpin 1, 2 and 3) (F). Special functional domains of proteins are depicted. Premature terminations are shown as solid triangles. Locations of insertions and deletions are also shown.

Major polymorphisms within immunomodulation-associated proteins in TT clones, Acam2000, and Cop.

Six proteins previously known to be associated with immunomodulation were selected for comparison using Cop as the reference strain. These proteins are A39R encoding semaphorin (A), B16R encoding an IL-1 beta receptor (B), B19R encoding a soluble and cell-surface interferon- α/β receptor (C), C4L encoding an IL-1 receptor antagonist (D), A53R encoding TNF receptor CrmC (E), and B13R encoding serine protease inhibitors (Serpin 1, 2 and 3) (F). Special functional domains of proteins are depicted. Premature terminations are shown as solid triangles. Locations of insertions and deletions are also shown.

Virulence of TT Clones and NYCBH in Animal Models

We compared the neurovirulence of parental TT (752-1), TT clones, and NYCBH. Groups of three-week-old BALB/c mice were intracranially inoculated with 3 x 102 PFU viral preparations or PBS and observed daily for weight change and mortality. In the control group (injected with PBS), all mice gained weight over the 12-day observation period. Mice that received NYCBH showed severe signs of illness, weight loss (Fig. 5A), and decreased physical activity starting on day 3 p.i. One mouse died on day 4, three more died on day 5 (Fig. 5B). By day 5, the remaining mouse had lost 39.7% of its initial body weight and died at day 6. For the TT (752-1) group, there was an initial weight gain, but on day 3 the mice began showing weight loss that persisted to day 11. One mouse died on day 7, another on day 8. The remaining three mice survived and gained body weight. The weight change among mice infected with TT (752-1) was less than those infected with NYCBH (P<0.05).
Figure 5

Viral neurovirulence properties in mice with intracranial inoculation.

BALB/c mice (n = 5 per testing group) were inoculated with 3 x 102 PFU of NYCBH, TT (752-1) or five TT clones (TT8 to TT12). Body weights and mortality were monitored daily for 12 days. Average body weight change (%) and one standard deviation (vertical bar) were calculated by comparing the body weight pre- and post-inoculation. Body weight change (A) and mortality (B) in TT (752-1), NYCBH, and PBS control; and body weight change (C) and mortality (D) in five TT clones. Symbols in (A) and (B): PBS: (□), TT (752-1): (○), NYCBH: (♦). Symbols in (C) and (D): TT8: (◊), TT9: (▾), TT10: (•), TT11: (▵), TT12: (×).

Viral neurovirulence properties in mice with intracranial inoculation.

BALB/c mice (n = 5 per testing group) were inoculated with 3 x 102 PFU of NYCBH, TT (752-1) or five TT clones (TT8 to TT12). Body weights and mortality were monitored daily for 12 days. Average body weight change (%) and one standard deviation (vertical bar) were calculated by comparing the body weight pre- and post-inoculation. Body weight change (A) and mortality (B) in TT (752-1), NYCBH, and PBS control; and body weight change (C) and mortality (D) in five TT clones. Symbols in (A) and (B): PBS: (□), TT (752-1): (○), NYCBH: (♦). Symbols in (C) and (D): TT8: (◊), TT9: (▾), TT10: (•), TT11: (▵), TT12: (×). We examined the virulence of five TT clones in the same manner. The patterns of weight loss (Fig. 5C) and mortality (Fig. 5D) were similar to their parental strain, but differences among clones were observed. Mice injected with TT8 or TT10 lost 33% of their body weight by day 8 and all of them died on day 9. One of the mice injected with TT12 lost 32% of its body weight, but survived to day 12. Three and four of the mice injected with TT9 and TT11, respectively, initially lost weight but survived and regained body weight up to the original level. We further characterized the skin virulence of the parental and cloned strains by inoculating four viral preparations, 102 to 105 PFU, into rabbit dorsal skin. Viral virulence was quantified by the diameter of skin lesion on day 4 p.i. As shown in Table 3, among the viral strains tested, NYCBH produced the largest lesions with the largest lesion measuring 9.8 mm in diameter at 105 PFU. Among TT strains, the parental strain yielded the largest lesions at the dilution of 105 PFU (4.6 mm) followed by TT8 (4.2 mm), TT9 (3.4 mm), TT10 (3.4 mm), TT12 (1.2 mm), and TT11 (1.0 mm). NYCBH yielded 100% putrescence at all dilutions. TT clones yield 100% putrescence at the highest 105 PFU inoculation, much less putrescence at the 104 PFU inoculation, and no putrescence at the 103 PFU inoculation.
Table 3

Viral skin virulence in rabbits.

105 PFU104 PFU103 PFU102 PFU
VACV strainAverage diameter of lesion (mm)Incidence of putrescence (%)Average diameter of lesion (mm)Incidence of putrescence (%)Average diameter of lesion (mm)Incidence of putrescence (%)Average diameter of lesion (mm)Incidence of putrescence (%)
TT84.21003.0500000
TT93.4100000000
TT103.41001.7750000
TT111.01000.8500000
TT121.21000.9250000
TT (752-1)4.61004.1500000
NYCBH9.81006.71005.21004.0100

Viral skin virulence in rabbits with intradermal inoculation. Rabbits were inoculated intradermally in dorsal skin with 102 to 105 PFU viral preparations from five TT clones, parental TT (752-1), and NYCBH. The average lesion diameter (mm) and putrescence incidence percentage are shown.

Viral skin virulence in rabbits with intradermal inoculation. Rabbits were inoculated intradermally in dorsal skin with 102 to 105 PFU viral preparations from five TT clones, parental TT (752-1), and NYCBH. The average lesion diameter (mm) and putrescence incidence percentage are shown.

Discussion

Similar to most vaccinia viruses used in the last century, TT has a vague origin and passage history. The earliest record shows its ancestral strain was isolated from skin lesions of a Chinese individual with smallpox in 1926 [17], [18], [19]. Vaccine stocks were established after monkey-rabbit-bovine passages and were later widely used in China during the smallpox eradication campaign. After 1969, TT vaccines were produced in CEF cell cultures but were never plaque-cloned. The lack or loss of well-organized records for vaccine production further add to the confusion of the identity and lineage of the virus [36]. Here we successfully characterized full genomes of five TT clones isolated from a CEF-derived stock, TT (752-1). Sequences from two other clones with incomplete terminal ITRs were also obtained. Our study, analogous to an earlier genetic analysis [37], shows that TT was a vaccinia virus, not a variola virus. Phylogenetic tree analysis shows that all TT clones were a mixture of closely clustered quasi-species with an inter-clone diversity slightly higher than that observed in clones derived from NYCBH/Dryvax. Presence of quasi-species was also reported in Lister/Elstree vaccine strains [12], [16], [38]. The genome structure of TT is the same as other vaccinia viruses. The genome length of TT clones varied from 189,366 in TT8 to 191,144 in TT11 with 273 identifiable ORFs. Insertions, deletions, and point mutations were present throughout the genome resulting in protein alterations. ORFs located in the middle of the genome were more conserved than those located at the two ITRs. We also examined biological activities of TT strains in mice using intracranial injections. TT (752-1) and its progeny clones behaved different in the induction of weight loss and mortality. These biological variations among TT clones may not be due to the replication abilities since they were similar in our study (data not show). The severity of the weight loss and mortality was less than that produced by the NYCBH strain. Our finding differs from Marennikova et al. who reported that TT displayed higher pathogenicity than NYCBH in mice [39], [40]. The TT stock used by Marennikova et al., was calf skin-derived, not one of the CEF-derived viral strains generated after 1969. We did not examine a calf skin-derived strain in our study and thus direct comparison between the calf skin and CEF derived TT viruses could not be made. Using NYCBH as the common denominator in both studies, it appears passage in CEF might have attenuated the virulence of the calf skin-derived TT. Likewise, we found TT strains displayed less virulence than NYCBH in mice and rabbits. This finding is corroborated by historic data. The frequency of post vaccination encephalitis from CEF-derived TT was 2.1 cases/million for primary vaccinations and 0 for progressive vaccinia; the corresponding data from calf skin-derived NYCBH were 2.9∼12.3 and 0.9∼1.5, respectively [8], [41]. Further systemic genotypic and phenotypic comparison might reveal underlying mechanisms related to viral virulence and immunomodulation. Our present genomic and phenotypic characterization of TT strains yields valuable information for continuing TT-based research in China or elsewhere to produce safer and more effective smallpox vaccines. It is also useful for the current vaccine research using TT-based vectors for HIV and other pathogenic viruses. Plaque properties of TT (752-1) and seven TT clones. Each clone of the TT (752-1) was plaque-purified and ∼50 PFU of each clone was plated on a monolayer of CEF cells. The infected cells were cultured for 3 days and then stained with crystal violet and imaged. The plaques were visualized using ImageJ and their sizes were determined. (TIF) Click here for additional data file. Identities and GenBank accession numbers of orthopoxviruses cited in this work. (DOC) Click here for additional data file. Complete complement of genes and gene fragments encoded by TT clones. a: The orthologs in Cop and WR were used as the reference. When no ortholog was present in these two reference strains the gene with the highest similarity in OPVs was used. b: orthologs of "X_ORF_X" in Cop were annotated in TT clones. These genes were predicted not to express. c: TT_005.1, TT_028.1, TT_191.1, TT_210.1, TT_252.1, and TT_265.1 were identified as fragments. (DOC) Click here for additional data file. Full length similarities among nucleotide sequences of orthologs in TT clones and four reference strains to TT11. TT11 was used as the reference clone for comparison with TT8, TT9, TT10, TT12, and four other VACVs (Cop, ListerV107, Acam2000 and WR). (DOC) Click here for additional data file.
  33 in total

1.  Viral genome organizer: a system for analyzing complete viral genomes.

Authors:  C Upton; D Hogg; D Perrin; M Boone; N L Harris
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.303

2.  Poxvirus orthologous clusters: toward defining the minimum essential poxvirus genome.

Authors:  Chris Upton; Stephanie Slack; Arwen L Hunter; Angelika Ehlers; Rachel L Roper
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  SOAP2: an improved ultrafast tool for short read alignment.

Authors:  Ruiqiang Li; Chang Yu; Yingrui Li; Tak-Wah Lam; Siu-Ming Yiu; Karsten Kristiansen; Jun Wang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Daniel Peterson; Nicholas Peterson; Glen Stecher; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  The use of smallpox virus as a biological weapon: the vaccination situation in France.

Authors:  D Lévy-Bruhl; N Guérin
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2001-11

6.  Shared modes of protection against poxvirus infection by attenuated and conventional smallpox vaccine viruses.

Authors:  Igor M Belyakov; Patricia Earl; Amiran Dzutsev; Vladimir A Kuznetsov; Michael Lemon; Linda S Wyatt; James T Snyder; Jeffrey D Ahlers; Genoveffa Franchini; Bernard Moss; Jay A Berzofsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Characterization of a vaccinia virus-encoded 42-kilodalton class I membrane glycoprotein component of the extracellular virus envelope.

Authors:  S N Isaacs; E J Wolffe; L G Payne; B Moss
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Genomic sequence of a clonal isolate of the vaccinia virus Lister strain employed for smallpox vaccination in France and its comparison to other orthopoxviruses.

Authors:  Aude Garcel; Jean-Marc Crance; Robert Drillien; Daniel Garin; Anne-Laure Favier
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.891

9.  A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLINICAL REACTION OBSERVED AFTER APPLICATION OF SEVERAL SMALLPOX VACCINES IN PRIMARY VACCINATION OF YOUNG ADULTS.

Authors:  M F POLAK; B J BEUNDERS; A R VAN DER WERFF; E W SANDERS; J VAN KLAVEREN; L M BRANS
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1963       Impact factor: 9.408

10.  Expression of Sindbis virus structural proteins via recombinant vaccinia virus: synthesis, processing, and incorporation into mature Sindbis virions.

Authors:  C M Rice; C A Franke; J H Strauss; D E Hruby
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.103

View more
  8 in total

1.  Genomic Analysis, Phenotype, and Virulence of the Historical Brazilian Smallpox Vaccine Strain IOC: Implications for the Origins and Evolutionary Relationships of Vaccinia Virus.

Authors:  Maria Luiza G Medaglia; Nissin Moussatché; Andreas Nitsche; Pjotr Wojtek Dabrowski; Yu Li; Inger K Damon; Carolina G O Lucas; Luciana B Arruda; Clarissa R Damaso
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 2.  Development of replication-competent viral vectors for HIV vaccine delivery.

Authors:  Christopher L Parks; Louis J Picker; C Richter King
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.283

3.  SPI-2/CrmA inhibits IFN-β induction by targeting TBK1/IKKε.

Authors:  Yue Qin; Mi Li; Sheng-Long Zhou; Wei Yin; Zhuan Bian; Hong-Bing Shu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  More cell culture passaged Camelpox virus sequences found resembling those of vaccinia virus.

Authors:  Abdelmalik I Khalafalla; Mohamed A Al Hosani; Hassan Zackaria Ali Ishag; Salama S Al Muhairi
Journal:  Open Vet J       Date:  2020-04-23

5.  Effect of the Route of Administration of the Vaccinia Virus Strain LIVP to Mice on Its Virulence and Immunogenicity.

Authors:  Sergei N Shchelkunov; Stanislav N Yakubitskiy; Alexander A Sergeev; Alexei S Kabanov; Tatiana V Bauer; Leonid E Bulychev; Stepan A Pyankov
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 5.048

6.  Genetic ancestry and population structure of vaccinia virus.

Authors:  Cristian Molteni; Diego Forni; Rachele Cagliani; Mario Clerici; Manuela Sironi
Journal:  NPJ Vaccines       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 9.399

7.  Immunogenicity of a vaccinia virus-based severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine candidate.

Authors:  Shan Mei; Zhangling Fan; Xiaoman Liu; Fei Zhao; Yu Huang; Liang Wei; Yamei Hu; Yu Xie; Liming Wang; Bin Ai; Chen Liang; Fengwen Xu; Fei Guo
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 8.  Monkeypox virus: past and present.

Authors:  Ya-Mei Dou; Hang Yuan; Hou-Wen Tian
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 9.186

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.