Literature DB >> 23592789

The quality and reporting of randomized trials in cardiothoracic physical therapy could be substantially improved.

Nádia N Geha1, Anne M Moseley, Mark R Elkins, Luciana D Chiavegato, Silvia R Shiwa, Leonardo O P Costa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While the number of reports of randomized controlled trials in physical therapy has increased substantially in the last decades, the quality and reporting of randomized trials have never been systematically investigated in the subdiscipline of cardiothoracic physical therapy. The primary aim was to determine the methodological quality and completeness of reporting of cardiothoracic physical therapy trials. Secondary aims were to investigate the range of clinical conditions investigated in these trials and the degree of association between trial characteristics and quality.
METHODS: All reports of randomized trials indexed on the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and coded as being relevant to cardiothoracic physical therapy were surveyed. PEDro scale individual items and total score were downloaded, and some characteristics included in the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement were extracted for each trial report.
RESULTS: The mean ± SD total PEDro score for the 2,970 included reports of cardiothoracic trials was 4.7 ± 1.4, with 27% being of moderate to high quality. The clinical conditions studied included chronic lung diseases (32% of the trials), cardiac diseases (20%), cardiovascular surgical conditions (5%), sleep disorders (5%), peripheral vascular disease (4%), acute lung disease (4%), critical illness (3%), and other surgical conditions (3%). The multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that endorsement of the CONSORT statement by the publishing journal, time since publication, evidence of trial registration, sources of funding, description of the sample size calculation, and identification of the primary outcome(s) had associations with the total PEDro score.
CONCLUSIONS: There is great potential to improve the quality of the conduct and reporting of trials evaluating the effects of cardiothoracic physical therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical trial; data quality; data reporting; methods; physical therapy; respiratory therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23592789     DOI: 10.4187/respcare.02379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Care        ISSN: 0020-1324            Impact factor:   2.258


  7 in total

1.  [Minimum requirements for high quality reporting of medical research results : CONSORT, STROBE and PRISMA statements].

Authors:  A Stevanovic; M Coburn; R Rossaint
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research.

Authors:  David Blanco; Doug Altman; David Moher; Isabelle Boutron; Jamie J Kirkham; Erik Cobo
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 3.  Methodological Quality of Randomized Clinical Trials of Respiratory Physiotherapy in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jaqueline Lorscheitter; Cinara Stein; Rodrigo Della Méa Plentz
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug

4.  CONSORT item reporting quality in the top ten ranked journals of critical care medicine in 2011: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Ana Stevanovic; Sabine Schmitz; Rolf Rossaint; Tobias Schürholz; Mark Coburn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Quantity and quality of randomized controlled trials published by Indian physiotherapists.

Authors:  K Hariohm; V Prakash; J Saravankumar
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

6.  A methodological survey on reporting of pilot and feasibility trials for physiotherapy interventions: a study protocol.

Authors:  Luiz Felicio Cadete Scola; Anne M Moseley; Lehana Thabane; Matheus Almeida; Lucíola da Cunha Menezes Costa
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Effect of eye patching in rehabilitation of hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  Nicola Smania; Cristina Fonte; Alessandro Picelli; Marialuisa Gandolfi; Valentina Varalta
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.