Literature DB >> 2359270

Acoustic correlates of vocal quality.

L Eskenazi1, D G Childers, D M Hicks.   

Abstract

We have investigated the relationship between various voice qualities and several acoustic measures made from the vowel /i/ phonated by subjects with normal voices and patients with vocal disorders. Among the patients (pathological voices), five qualities were investigated: overall severity, hoarseness, breathiness, roughness, and vocal fry. Six acoustic measures were examined. With one exception, all measures were extracted from the residue signal obtained by inverse filtering the speech signal using the linear predictive coding (LPC) technique. A formal listening test was implemented to rate each pathological voice for each vocal quality. A formal listening test also rated overall excellence of the normal voices. A scale of 1-7 was used. Multiple linear regression analysis between the results of the listening test and the various acoustic measures was used with the prediction sums of squares (PRESS) as the selection criteria. Useful prediction equations of order two or less were obtained relating certain acoustic measures and the ratings of pathological voices for each of the five qualities. The two most useful parameters for predicting vocal quality were the Pitch Amplitude (PA) and the Harmonics-to-Noise Ratio (HNR). No acoustic measure could rank the normal voices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2359270     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3302.298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  18 in total

1.  A method for turbulent noise estimation in voiced signals.

Authors:  P Mitev; S Hadjitodorov
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Perceptual interaction of the harmonic source and noise in voice.

Authors:  Jody Kreiman; Bruce R Gerratt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of age on the amplitude, frequency and perceived quality of voice.

Authors:  Catherine L Lortie; Mélanie Thibeault; Matthieu J Guitton; Pascale Tremblay
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2015-11-14

Review 4.  Voice processing in human and non-human primates.

Authors:  Pascal Belin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Aging Effect on Korean Female Voice: Acoustic and Perceptual Examinations of Breathiness.

Authors:  Seung Jin Lee; YoonHee Cho; Ji Yeon Song; DamHee Lee; Yunjung Kim; HyangHee Kim
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 0.849

6.  Test-Retest Reliability of Relative Fundamental Frequency and Conventional Acoustic, Aerodynamic, and Perceptual Measures in Individuals With Healthy Voices.

Authors:  Yeonggwang Park; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Factors associated with vocal fry among college students.

Authors:  Lady Catherine Cantor-Cutiva; Pasquale Bottalico; Eric Hunter
Journal:  Logoped Phoniatr Vocol       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 1.487

8.  Feature analysis of pathological speech signals using local discriminant bases technique.

Authors:  K Umapathy; S Krishnan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Measures of spectral slope using an excised larynx model.

Authors:  Fariborz Alipour; Ronald C Scherer; Eileen Finnegan
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Standardization of pitch-range settings in voice acoustic analysis.

Authors:  Adam P Vogel; Paul Maruff; Peter J Snyder; James C Mundt
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.