BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We recently reported that kidney function declined faster among initiators of sulfonylureas compared to metformin; however, sulfonylurea use compared to metformin use was also associated with increases in body mass index (BMI) and systolic blood pressure (SBP). We sought to determine if differences between sulfonylureas and metformin on kidney function decline were mediated by differential effects on BMI, SBP, or glucose control. METHODS: We identified 13,238 veterans who initiated sulfonylurea or metformin treatment (2000–2007) with a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >60 mL/minute, and followed them until a study event occurred, non-persistence on treatment, loss of follow-up, or end of the study. The composite outcome was a sustained decline from baseline eGFR of ≥25%, end-stage renal disease, or death. We estimated the association of cumulative measurements of potential mediators including BMI, SBP, and glycated hemoglobin on the study outcome. We determined if controlling for these time-varying covariates accounted for the differences in outcome between sulfonylurea and metformin initiators. RESULTS: Compared to sulfonylurea use, metformin use was associated with a lower risk for renal function decline or death [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.70, 0.97]. This protective association remained significant [aHR 0.83 (0.70–0.98)] when accounting for the cumulative time-varying measurements of the three mediators of interest. CONCLUSION: Metformin initiation was associated with a lower risk of kidney function decline or death compared to sulfonylureas, which which appeared to be independent of changes in BMI, SBP, and glycated hemoglobin over time.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We recently reported that kidney function declined faster among initiators of sulfonylureas compared to metformin; however, sulfonylurea use compared to metformin use was also associated with increases in body mass index (BMI) and systolic blood pressure (SBP). We sought to determine if differences between sulfonylureas and metformin on kidney function decline were mediated by differential effects on BMI, SBP, or glucose control. METHODS: We identified 13,238 veterans who initiated sulfonylurea or metformin treatment (2000–2007) with a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >60 mL/minute, and followed them until a study event occurred, non-persistence on treatment, loss of follow-up, or end of the study. The composite outcome was a sustained decline from baseline eGFR of ≥25%, end-stage renal disease, or death. We estimated the association of cumulative measurements of potential mediators including BMI, SBP, and glycated hemoglobin on the study outcome. We determined if controlling for these time-varying covariates accounted for the differences in outcome between sulfonylurea and metformin initiators. RESULTS: Compared to sulfonylurea use, metformin use was associated with a lower risk for renal function decline or death [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.70, 0.97]. This protective association remained significant [aHR 0.83 (0.70–0.98)] when accounting for the cumulative time-varying measurements of the three mediators of interest. CONCLUSION:Metformin initiation was associated with a lower risk of kidney function decline or death compared to sulfonylureas, which which appeared to be independent of changes in BMI, SBP, and glycated hemoglobin over time.
Authors: Myung-Ja Lee; Denis Feliers; Meenalakshmi M Mariappan; Kavithalakshmi Sataranatarajan; Lenin Mahimainathan; Nicolas Musi; Marc Foretz; Benoit Viollet; Joel M Weinberg; Goutam Ghosh Choudhury; Balakuntalam S Kasinath Journal: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol Date: 2006-10-03
Authors: George L Bakris; Luis M Ruilope; Stephen O McMorn; Wayde M Weston; Mark A Heise; Martin I Freed; Lisa E Porter Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Ian H de Boer; Ronit Katz; Linda F Fried; Joachim H Ix; Jose Luchsinger; Mark J Sarnak; Michael G Shlipak; David S Siscovick; Bryan Kestenbaum Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2009-09-25 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: B Descamps-Latscha; A Herbelin; A T Nguyen; P Roux-Lombard; J Zingraff; A Moynot; C Verger; D Dahmane; D de Groote; P Jungers Journal: J Immunol Date: 1995-01-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Godela M Brosnahan; Wei Wang; Berenice Gitomer; Taylor Struemph; Diana George; Zhiying You; Kristen L Nowak; Jelena Klawitter; Michel B Chonchol Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2021-08-12 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Raymond Vanholder; Steven Van Laecke; Griet Glorieux; Francis Verbeke; Esmeralda Castillo-Rodriguez; Alberto Ortiz Journal: Toxins (Basel) Date: 2018-06-12 Impact factor: 4.546
Authors: Jiandong Zhou; Guoming Zhang; Carlin Chang; Oscar Hou In Chou; Sharen Lee; Keith Sai Kit Leung; Wing Tak Wong; Tong Liu; Abraham Ka Chung Wai; Shuk Han Cheng; Qingpeng Zhang; Gary Tse Journal: Acta Diabetol Date: 2022-02-03 Impact factor: 4.280
Authors: Samantha V Wilkinson; Laurie A Tomlinson; Masao Iwagami; Heide A Stirnadel-Farrant; Liam Smeeth; Ian Douglas Journal: Wellcome Open Res Date: 2018-06-19
Authors: Rene A Posma; Chris P H Lexis; Erik Lipsic; Maarten W N Nijsten; Kevin Damman; Daan J Touw; Dirk Jan van Veldhuisen; Pim van der Harst; Iwan C C van der Horst Journal: Cardiovasc Drugs Ther Date: 2015 Impact factor: 3.727