Literature DB >> 23592171

Stage III & IV colon and rectal cancers share a similar genetic profile: a review of the Oregon Colorectal Cancer Registry.

Ute Gawlick1, Kim C Lu, Miriam A Douthit, Brian S Diggs, Kathryn G Schuff, Daniel O Herzig, Vassiliki L Tsikitis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Determining the molecular profile of colon and rectal cancers offers the possibility of personalized cancer treatment. The purpose of this study was to determine whether known genetic mutations associated with colorectal carcinogenesis differ between colon and rectal cancers and whether they are associated with survival.
METHODS: The Oregon Colorectal Cancer Registry is a prospectively maintained, institutional review board-approved tissue repository with associated demographic and clinical information. The registry was queried for any patient with molecular analysis paired with clinical data. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, microsatellite instability status, and mutational analysis for p53, AKT, BRAF, KRAS, MET, NRAS, and PIK3CA were analyzed. Categorical variables were compared using chi-square tests. Continuous variables between groups were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U tests. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for survival studies. Comparisons of survival were made using log-rank tests.
RESULTS: The registry included 370 patients: 69% with colon cancer and 31% with rectal cancer. Eighty percent of colon cancers and 68% of rectal cancers were stages III and IV. Mutational analysis found no significant differences in detected mutations between colon and rectal cancers, except that there were significantly more BRAF mutations in colon cancers compared with rectal cancers (10% vs 0%, P < .008). No differences were seen in 5-year survival rates of patients with colon versus rectal cancers when stratified by the presence of KRAS, PIK3CA, and BRAF mutations.
CONCLUSIONS: Stage III and IV colon and rectal cancers share similar molecular profiles, except that there were significantly more BRAF mutations in colon cancers compared with rectal cancers.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23592171     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.01.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  5 in total

1.  Understanding and Resetting Radiation Sensitivity in Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Katherine A Kelley; Rebecca A Ruhl; Shushan R Rana; Elizabeth Dewey; Cristina Espinosa; Charles R Thomas; Robert G Martindale; Sudarshan Anand; Vassiliki L Tsikitis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Segmental distribution of some common molecular markers for colorectal cancer (CRC): influencing factors and potential implications.

Authors:  Petros Christakis Papagiorgis
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-02-03

3.  Mutation profiling in chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and its correlation with clinicopathological features and anti-EGFR treatment response.

Authors:  Zhe-Zhen Li; Feng Wang; Zi-Chen Zhang; Fang Wang; Qi Zhao; Dong-Sheng Zhang; Feng-Hua Wang; Zhi-Qiang Wang; Hui-Yan Luo; Ming-Ming He; De-Shen Wang; Ying Jin; Chao Ren; Miao-Zhen Qiu; Jian Ren; Zhi-Zhong Pan; Yu-Hong Li; Jiao-Yong Shao; Rui-Hua Xu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-05-10

4.  Identification of two novel biomarkers of rectal carcinoma progression and prognosis via co-expression network analysis.

Authors:  Min Sun; Taojiao Sun; Zhongshi He; Bin Xiong
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-27

5.  microRNA-451a regulates colorectal cancer proliferation in response to radiation.

Authors:  Rebecca Ruhl; Shushan Rana; Katherine Kelley; Cristina Espinosa-Diez; Clayton Hudson; Christian Lanciault; Charles R Thomas; V Liana Tsikitis; Sudarshan Anand
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.