Literature DB >> 23592170

Mesh choice in ventral hernia repair: so many choices, so little time.

Dinh Le1, Clifford W Deveney, Nancy L Reaven, Susan E Funk, Karen J McGaughey, Robert G Martindale.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently, >200 meshes are commercially available in the United States. To help guide appropriate mesh selection, the investigators examined the postsurgical experiences of all patients undergoing ventral hernia repair at their facility from 2008 to 2011 with ≥12 months of follow-up.
METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was conducted. All returns (surgical readmission, office or emergency visit) for complications or recurrences were examined. The impact of demographics (age, gender, and body mass index [BMI]), risk factors (hernia grade, hernia size, concurrent and past bariatric surgery, concurrent and past organ transplantation, any concurrent surgery, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score), and prosthetic type (polypropylene, other synthetic, human acellular dermal matrix, non-cross-linked porcine-derived acellular dermal matrix, other biologic, or none) on the frequency of return was evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 564 patients had 12 months of follow-up, and 417 patients had 18 months of follow-up. In a univariate regression analysis, study arm (biologic, synthetic, or primary repair), hernia grade, hernia size, past bariatric surgery, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score were significant predictors of recurrence (P < .05). Multivariate analysis, stepwise regression, and interaction tests identified three variables with significant predictive power: hernia grade, hernia size, and BMI. The adjusted odds ratios vs hernia grade 2 for surgical readmission were 2.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 5.1) for grade 3 and 2.6 (95% CI, 1.1 to 6.4) for grade 4 at 12 months and 2.3 (95% CI, 1.1 to 4.6) for grade 3 and 4.2 (95% CI, 1.7 to 10.0) for grade 4 at 18 months. Large hernia size (adjusted odds ratio vs small size, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.6 to 6.2) and higher BMI (adjusted odds ratio for BMI ≥50 vs 30 to 34.99 kg/m(2), 5.7; 95% CI, 1.2 to 26.2) increased the likelihood of surgical readmission within 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The present data support the hypothesis that careful matching of patient characteristics to choice of prosthetic will minimize complications, readmissions, and the number of postoperative office visits.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23592170     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.01.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  16 in total

1.  Abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR): the need to identify the hospital units and referral centers entitled to perform it.

Authors:  Francesco Gossetti; Linda D'Amore; Francesca Ceci; Maria Romana Grimaldi; Paolo Negro
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-04-04

Review 2.  A review of biocompatibility in hernia repair; considerations in vitro and in vivo for selecting the most appropriate repair material.

Authors:  N Bryan; C Battersby; N Smart; J Hunt
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Differences of alternative methods of measuring abdominal wall hernia defect size: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Deepa V Cherla; Debbie F Lew; Richard J Escamilla; Julie L Holihan; Arun S Cherla; Juan Flores-Gonzalez; Tien C Ko; Lillian S Kao; Mike K Liang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Intraluminal mesh migration causing enteroenteric and enterocutaneous fistula: a case and discussion of the 'mesh problem'.

Authors:  Reeya Patel; Thomas H Reid; Sam G Parker; Alistair Windsor
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-04-17

5.  Decreasing Surgical Site Infections after Ventral Hernia Repair: A Quality-Improvement Initiative.

Authors:  Deepa V Cherla; Julie L Holihan; Juan R Flores-Gonzalez; Debbie F Lew; Richard J Escamilla; Tien C Ko; Lillian S Kao; Mike K Liang
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.150

Review 6.  Laparoscopic repair reduces incidence of surgical site infections for all ventral hernias.

Authors:  Nestor A Arita; Mylan T Nguyen; Duyen H Nguyen; Rachel L Berger; Debbie F Lew; James T Suliburk; Erik P Askenasy; Lillian S Kao; Mike K Liang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  First human use of hybrid synthetic/biologic mesh in ventral hernia repair: a multicenter trial.

Authors:  James G Bittner; Kevin El-Hayek; Andrew T Strong; Melissa Phillips LaPinska; Jin S Yoo; Eric M Pauli; Matthew Kroh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  A simplified laparoscopic approach to ventral hernia repair: a new "finned" mesh configuration with defect closure.

Authors:  George Christoudias; Maritsa Nunziata
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Component separation with porcine acellular dermal reinforcement is superior to traditional bridged mesh repairs in the open repair of significant midline ventral hernia defects.

Authors:  Bryan Richmond; Adam Ubert; Rudy Judhan; Jonathan King; Tanner Harrah; Benjamin Dyer; Stephanie Thompson
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 10.  Evolution and advances in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  Alan L Vorst; Christodoulos Kaoutzanis; Alfredo M Carbonell; Michael G Franz
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.