Literature DB >> 23591951

Effectiveness of different postactivation potentiation protocols with and without whole body vibration on jumping performance in college athletes.

Fernando Naclerio1, Avery D Faigenbaum, Eneko Larumbe-Zabala, Nicholas A Ratamess, Jie Kang, Paul Friedman, Ryan E Ross.   

Abstract

This study examined the acute effects of different parallel squat postactivation potentiation protocols with and without whole body vibration on jumping performance in college athletes. Fifteen men (20.3 ± 1.3 years, 179.50 ± 5.3 cm, 81.0 ± 10.8 kg) performed 3 repetitions of a countermovement jump (CMJ) and best drop jump after 3 conditions: (a) parallel squat with 80% 1 repetition maximum without vibration (NV-PS), (b) parallel squat with 80% 1 repetition maximum on a whole body vibration platform (WBV-PS) (1.963-mm amplitude and 40 Hz), and (c) control (C). Each condition was performed under both low-volume (LV) (1 set of 3 repetitions) and high-volume (HV) (3 sets of 3 repetitions) protocols that were followed by both 1- and 4-minute rest periods. Significant improvements were observed for the CMJ height (p = 0.005) after 4 minutes of recovery and the LV protocol (p = 0.015) regardless of the condition. Additionally, for the WBV-PS condition, a significantly lower drop jump height was observed after 1 minute (p = 0.0022) after both low (p = 0.022) and HV (0.010) protocols. In conclusion, 4 minutes of recovery was adequate for improving CMJ height after an LV protocol regardless of the condition and restoring drop jump height performance after WBV-PS regardless of the protocol in male college athletes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23591951     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318295d7fb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  7 in total

Review 1.  Understanding Vertical Jump Potentiation: A Deterministic Model.

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; Hugh S Lamont; Gavin L Moir
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Small and inconsistent effects of whole body vibration on athletic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tibor Hortobágyi; Melanie Lesinski; Miguel Fernandez-Del-Olmo; Urs Granacher
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Whole body vibration exercises and the improvement of the flexibility in patient with metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Danúbia da Cunha Sá-Caputo; Pedro Ronikeili-Costa; Rafaelle Pacheco Carvalho-Lima; Luciana Camargo Bernardo; Milena Oliveira Bravo-Monteiro; Rebeca Costa; Janaina de Moraes-Silva; Dulciane Nunes Paiva; Christiano Bittencourt Machado; Paula Mantilla-Giehl; Adriano Arnobio; Pedro Jesus Marin; Mario Bernardo-Filho
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2014-09-03

4.  Can Different Complex Training Improve the Individual Phenomenon of Post-Activation Potentiation?

Authors:  Zong-Rong Chen; Shin-Liang Lo; Min-Hsien Wang; Ching-Fang Yu; Hsien-Te Peng
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2017-03-12       Impact factor: 2.193

5.  The Acute Effect of Foam Rolling and Vibration Foam Rolling on Drop Jump Performance.

Authors:  Wei-Chi Tsai; Zong-Rong Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Sex-specific response to whole-body vibration training: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Manfred Hartard; Aaron Seiler; Peter Spitzenpfeil; Linus Engel; Diana Hartard; Mohamed Amine Fenneni; Helmi Ben Saad
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.806

7.  Effects of plyometric and whole-body vibration on physical performance in collegiate basketball players: a crossover randomized trial.

Authors:  Pratyakshi Munshi; Moazzam Hussain Khan; Nitin Kumar Arora; Shibili Nuhmani; Shahnawaz Anwer; Heng Li; Ahmad H Alghadir
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.