Literature DB >> 23591943

Assessing the variation in the load that produces maximal upper-body power.

Christos K Argus1, Nicholas D Gill, Justin W L Keogh, Will G Hopkins.   

Abstract

Substantial variation in the load that produces maximal power has been reported. It has been suggested that the variation observed may be due to differences in subjects' physical characteristics. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the extent in which anthropometric measures correlate with the load that produces maximal power. Anthropometric measures (upper-arm length, forearm length, total arm length, and upper-arm girth) and bench press strength were assessed in 26 professional rugby union players. Peak power was then determined in the bench press throw exercise using loads of 20-60% of one repetition maximum (1RM) in the bench press exercise. Maximal power occurred at 30 ± 14% 1RM (mean ± SD). Upper-arm length had the highest correlation with the load maximizing power: -0.61 (90% confidence limits -0.35 to -0.78), implying loads of 22 vs. 38% 1RM maximize power for players with typically long vs. short upper-arm length. Correlations for forearm length, total arm length, and upper-arm girth to the load that maximized power were -0.29 (0.04 to -0.57), -0.56 (-0.28 to -0.75), and -0.29 (0.04 to -0.57), respectively. The relationship between 1RM and the load that produced maximal power was r = -0.23 (0.10 to -0.52). The between-subject variation in the load that maximized power observed (SD = ±14% of 1RM) may have been due to differences in anthropometric characteristics, and absolute strength and power outputs. Indeed, athletes with longer limbs and larger girths and greater maximal strength and power outputs used a lower percentage of 1RM loads to achieve maximum power. Therefore, we recommend individual assessment of the load that maximizes power output.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23591943     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318295d1c9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  5 in total

1.  The Effects of Eccentric Cadence on Power and Velocity of the Bar during the Concentric Phase of the Bench Press Movement.

Authors:  Michal Wilk; Artur Golas; Michał Krzysztofik; Monika Nawrocka; Adam Zajac
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 2.  A brief review of strength and ballistic assessment methodologies in sport.

Authors:  Daniel Travis McMaster; Nicholas Gill; John Cronin; Michael McGuigan
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  The impact of test loads on the accuracy of 1RM prediction using the load-velocity relationship.

Authors:  Mark G L Sayers; Michel Schlaeppi; Marina Hitz; Silvio Lorenzetti
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-05-29

4.  The Effect of the Number of Sets on Power Output for Different Loads.

Authors:  Antonio J Morales-Artacho; Paulino Padial; Amador García-Ramos; Belén Feriche
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 2.193

5.  The effects of training with loads that maximise power output and individualised repetitions vs. traditional power training.

Authors:  J M Sarabia; M Moya-Ramón; J L Hernández-Davó; J Fernandez-Fernandez; R Sabido
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.