Literature DB >> 23591940

Optimising assessment intervals improves visual outcomes in ranibizumab-treated age-related neovascular degeneration: using the stability phase as a benchmark.

Patrizia Tschuor1, Bertrand Pilly, Divya Venugopal, Richard Peter Gale.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To observe visual acuity change in the stability phase when follow-up intervals are decreased in ranibizumab-treated neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nvAMD).
METHODS: Selection of patients was based on a review of a cohort of 189 eyes of 154 patients with nvAMD treated with intravitreal ranibizumab in routine clinical practice. Patients were transferred from a base hospital with a 8-week follow-up interval to a community eye clinic, enabling a new follow-up interval of 4 weeks. Staff, assessment, and treatment protocols were equivalent in the two centres. Patients were included when they were in the stability phase of treatment defined 1 month after having completed their three initiation treatments with ranibizumab. Each patient was required to have attended at least a further 12 visits; this means a follow-up time for a year or longer, consisting of six visits at the base hospital followed by six visits at the new eye clinic. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), follow-up intervals and injection numbers were collected.
RESULTS: Seventy-two eyes of 62 patients were included. The mean follow-up interval for the six visits in the base hospital was 56.81 days, and in the new eye centre 31.81 days. The BCVA loss in the base hospital was -1.13 letters, compared to a gain of +4.61 letters in the community eye clinic over the six visits. The number of ranibizumab injections was 3.67 in the base hospital, compared with 3.91 in the other centre over the respective periods.
CONCLUSION: Visual acuity improves and severe visual loss decreases when follow-up intervals reduce from approximately 8 weeks to 4 weeks. Furthermore, using the stability phase to evaluate the outcome and effectiveness of our treatments for age-related macular degeneration appeared to be an efficient tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23591940     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-013-2332-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  17 in total

1.  Evaluation of injection frequency and visual acuity outcomes for ranibizumab monotherapy in exudative age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Hajir Dadgostar; Alexandre A C M Ventura; Jeffrey Y Chung; Sumit Sharma; Peter K Kaiser
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Results of flexible ranibizumab treatment in age-related macular degeneration and search for parameters with impact on outcome.

Authors:  Heinrich Gerding; Vlassios Loukopoulos; Juliane Riese; Lars Hefner; Melanie Timmermann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Ranibizumab versus verteporfin for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  David M Brown; Peter K Kaiser; Mark Michels; Gisele Soubrane; Jeffrey S Heier; Robert Y Kim; Judy P Sy; Susan Schneider
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Daniel F Martin; Maureen G Maguire; Gui-shuang Ying; Juan E Grunwald; Stuart L Fine; Glenn J Jaffe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  A variable-dosing regimen with intravitreal ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: year 2 of the PrONTO Study.

Authors:  Geeta A Lalwani; Philip J Rosenfeld; Anne E Fung; Sander R Dubovy; Stephen Michels; William Feuer; Janet L Davis; Harry W Flynn; Maria Esquiabro
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-04-18       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  A Phase IIIb study to evaluate the safety of ranibizumab in subjects with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  David S Boyer; Jeffrey S Heier; David M Brown; Steven F Francom; Tsontcho Ianchulev; Roman G Rubio
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Further observations on the association between smoking and the long-term incidence and progression of age-related macular degeneration: the Beaver Dam Eye Study.

Authors:  Ronald Klein; Michael D Knudtson; Karen J Cruickshanks; Barbara E K Klein
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01

8.  Randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled trial of ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: PIER Study year 1.

Authors:  Carl D Regillo; David M Brown; Prema Abraham; Huibin Yue; Tsontcho Ianchulev; Susan Schneider; Naveed Shams
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  A review of safety incidents in England and Wales for vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor medications.

Authors:  S P Kelly; A Barua
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 10.  Action on AMD. Optimising patient management: act now to ensure current and continual delivery of best possible patient care.

Authors:  W Amoaku; S Blakeney; M Freeman; R Gale; R Johnston; S P Kelly; B McLaughlan; D Sahu; D Varma
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.775

View more
  2 in total

1.  Refractory subretinal fluid in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with intravitreal ranibizumab: visual acuity outcome.

Authors:  Liuna Jang; Christina Gianniou; Aude Ambresin; Irmela Mantel
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Two-year outcome of an observe-and-plan regimen for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: how to alleviate the clinical burden with maintained functional results.

Authors:  C Gianniou; A Dirani; W Ferrini; L Marchionno; D Decugis; A Deli; A Ambresin; I Mantel
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.775

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.