Literature DB >> 23591409

Landmark study comparing surgical approaches for rectal cancer.

Steven D Wexner1.   

Abstract

Although numerous studies have reported the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer, the results of large multicentre randomized controlled trials have been lacking. A study including 1,103 patients has now shown that laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer can result in similar safety, resection margins and completeness of resection with improved recovery compared with laparotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23591409     DOI： 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN： 1759-5045            Impact factor:   46.802


  9 in total

1.  Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer: results from a large nationwide population-based analysis.

Authors:  Scott R Steele; Tommy A Brown; Robert M Rush; Matthew J Martin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Laparoscopy impacts outcomes favorably following colectomy for ulcerative colitis: a critical analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database.

Authors:  Marlin W Causey; Doug Stoddard; Eric K Johnson; Justin A Maykel; Matthew J Martin; David Rivadeneira; Scott R Steele
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Jane C Weeks; Heidi Nelson; Shari Gelber; Daniel Sargent; Georgene Schroeder
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-01-16       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Laparoscopy decreases anastomotic leak rate in sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis.

Authors:  Melissa Levack; David Berger; Patricia Sylla; David Rattner; Liliana Bordeianou
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2011-02

5.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Short-term outcome analysis of a randomized study comparing laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  A M Lacy; J C García-Valdecasas; J M Piqué; S Delgado; E Campo; J M Bordas; P Taurá; L Grande; J Fuster; J L Pacheco
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Martijn Hgm van der Pas; Eva Haglind; Miguel A Cuesta; Alois Fürst; Antonio M Lacy; Wim Cj Hop; Hendrik Jaap Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group.

Authors:  David G Jayne; Pierre J Guillou; Helen Thorpe; Philip Quirke; Joanne Copeland; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.