Literature DB >> 23590981

A comparison among different techniques for human ERG signals processing and classification.

R Barraco1, D Persano Adorno2, M Brai1, L Tranchina3.   

Abstract

Feature detection in biomedical signals is crucial for deepening our knowledge about the involved physiological processes. To achieve this aim, many analytic approaches can be applied but only few are able to deal with signals whose time dependent features provide useful clinical information. Among the biomedical signals, the electroretinogram (ERG), that records the retinal response to a light flash, can improve our comprehension of the complex photoreceptoral activities. The present study is focused on the analysis of the early response of the photoreceptoral human system, known as a-wave ERG-component. This wave reflects the functional integrity of the photoreceptors, rods and cones, whose activation dynamics are not yet completely understood. Moreover, since in incipient photoreceptoral pathologies eventual anomalies in a-wave are not always detectable with a "naked eye" analysis of the traces, the possibility to discriminate pathologic from healthy traces, by means of appropriate analytical techniques, could help in clinical diagnosis. In the present paper, we discuss and compare the efficiency of various techniques of signal processing, such as Fourier analysis (FA), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Wavelet Analysis (WA) in recognising pathological traces from the healthy ones. The investigated retinal pathologies are Achromatopsia, a cone disease and Congenital Stationary Night Blindness, affecting the photoreceptoral signal transmission. Our findings prove that both PCA and FA of conventional ERGs, don't add clinical information useful for the diagnosis of ocular pathologies, whereas the use of a more sophisticated analysis, based on the wavelet transform, provides a powerful tool for routine clinical examinations of patients.
Copyright © 2013 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERG signals; Principal component analysis; Retinal pathologies; Wavelet analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23590981     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  6 in total

1.  Time and frequency components of ERG responses in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Samira Ebdali; Bijan Hashemi; Hassan Hashemi; Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur; Soheila Asgari
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Empirical mode decomposition and neural network for the classification of electroretinographic data.

Authors:  Abdollah Bagheri; Dominique Persano Adorno; Piervincenzo Rizzo; Rosita Barraco; Leonardo Bellomonte
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Novel Machine-Learning Based Framework Using Electroretinography Data for the Detection of Early-Stage Glaucoma.

Authors:  Mohan Kumar Gajendran; Landon J Rohowetz; Peter Koulen; Amirfarhang Mehdizadeh
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 5.152

4.  Witnessing the first sign of retinitis pigmentosa onset in the allegedly normal eye of a case of unilateral RP: a 30-year follow-up.

Authors:  Mathieu Gauvin; Hadi Chakor; Robert K Koenekoop; John M Little; Jean-Marc Lina; Pierre Lachapelle
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Wavelet decomposition analysis in the two-flash multifocal ERG in early glaucoma: a comparison to ganglion cell analysis and visual field.

Authors:  Livia M Brandao; Matthias Monhart; Andreas Schötzau; Anna A Ledolter; Anja M Palmowski-Wolfe
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Oscillatory Potentials in Achromatopsia as a Tool for Understanding Cone Retinal Functions.

Authors:  Giulia Righetti; Melanie Kempf; Christoph Braun; Ronja Jung; Susanne Kohl; Bernd Wissinger; Eberhart Zrenner; Katarina Stingl; Krunoslav Stingl
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.