Literature DB >> 23590615

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy use is increasing in the United States: an analysis of trends and complications.

Hossein S Mirheydar1, Kerrin L Palazzi, Ithaar H Derweesh, David C Chang, Roger L Sur.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the use and complication rates of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) performed in the United States between 1998 and 2009. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was analyzed from 1998 to 2009 to identify all PCNL cases performed in adults ≥18 years old. Descriptive statistics were used for potential covariates: Demographics, comorbidities, academic/community hospital, rural/urban location, and U.S. geographic region. Common complications encoded by International Classification of Diseases-9 codes after PCNL were reported over time, and those found to be statistically significant were evaluated in the multivariate regression. Linear regression was used to analyze surgical trends. Multivariate regression was performed to identify covariates that predicted any surgical complication.
RESULTS: The use of PCNL among inpatients increased significantly from 15 to 27 surgeries/100,000 discharges between 1998 and 2009 (P<0.001), and this increase was seen in all geographic regions of the United States. The increase in adoption of PCNL was accompanied by an increase in complications (14% to 19%, P<0.001). Higher comorbidity (Charlson ≥3) was the strongest predictor of complications in multivariate analysis (odds ratio=2.22, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate an increase in PCNL use in the United States over the last decade. While there was an increase in surgical complications during this same period, the complication rate found reported is commensurate with other international reports. PCNL is safe and use of percutaneous surgery in the United States will most likely continue to increase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23590615     DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  16 in total

1.  Is standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy still the standard treatment modality for renal stones less than three centimeters?

Authors:  Ömer Sarılar; Faruk Özgör; Onur Küçüktopçu; Burak Uçpınar; Mehmet Fatih Akbulut; Metin Savun; Zafer Gökhan Gürbüz; Murat Binbay
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-05-03

2.  The evolution of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Analysis of a single institution experience over 25 years.

Authors:  Jennifer Bjazevic; Linda Nott; Philippe D Violette; Thomas Tailly; Marie Dion; John D Denstedt; Hassan Razvi
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Predictors of clinical outcome after minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal calculus.

Authors:  Zhao-Lun Li; Qian Deng; Tie Chong; Peng Zhang; He-Cheng Li; Hong-Liang Li; Hai-Wen Chen; Wei-Min Gan
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Which is better? Guy's versus S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scoring systems in predicting stone-free status post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Yasser A Noureldin; Mohamed A Elkoushy; Sero Andonian
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Supracostal access for miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of supracostal and infracostal approaches.

Authors:  Faruk Ozgor; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Ismail Basibuyuk; Onur Kucuktopcu; Yunus Kayali; Fatih Yanaral; Murat Binbay
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Performance of SOFA, qSOFA and SIRS to predict septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Yonghan Peng; Wei Zhang; Yalong Xu; Ling Li; Weixing Yu; Jianwen Zeng; Shaoxiong Ming; Ziyu Fang; Zeyu Wang; Xiaofeng Gao
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Factors affecting complications according to the modified Clavien classification in complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Siavash Falahatkar; Keivan Gholamjani Moghaddam; Ehsan Kazemnezhad; Alireza Farzan; Hamidreza Baghani Aval; Ali Ghasemi; Elaheh Shahab; Seyednaser Seyed Esmaeili; Reza Motiee; Seyedeh Alaleh Motiei Langroodi; Mohadeseh Nemati; Aliakbar Allahkhah
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Predictive values of the SOFA score and procalcitonin for septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Haifeng Hou; Jun Yang; Zhenhua Han; Xiaoyang Zhang; Xiaoying Tang; Tianming Chen
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 2.861

9.  Clinically insignificant residual fragments after flexible ureterorenoscopy: medium-term follow-up results.

Authors:  Faruk Ozgor; Abdulmuttalip Simsek; Murat Binbay; Tolga Akman; Onur Kucuktopcu; Omer Sarilar; Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu; Yalcin Berberoglu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Visualization of the renal vein filled with contrast agent may indicate the renal vein injury during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: two case reports.

Authors:  Xiao-Feng Chen; Jian-Jun Zhou; Jian-Ming Sun; Guo-Can Cao; Yi-Hua Zou; Wang-Long Deng
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.