PURPOSE: To assess the incidence of extracardiac findings in patients undergoing clinical cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) of the heart, and to determine the influence of those findings on patient management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During 40 months, 854 CMRI were performed at 1.5 T. Extracardiac findings were classified as significant (group A), if recommended for additional diagnostics or therapeutic interventions, and as nonsignificant (group B). RESULTS: The most frequent indication for CMRI was evaluation of cardiac stress ischemia. In all, 631 CMRI (74% of 854) showed no extracardiac pathologies. In the remaining 223 CMRI (26% of 854), a total of 286 extracardiac findings were detected. Among these findings, 49 were considered significant (group A) and 237 nonsignificant (group B). In group A, the most common findings were suspicious pulmonary nodules or masses. In group B, the most frequent findings were hepatic cysts or hemangiomas. Eight malignancies were observed with certainty at CMRI. Seven of them had been incidentally diagnosed on CMRI for the first time, and subsequently changed the patients' management. CONCLUSION: Extracardiac findings in clinically indicated CMRI are common (about 26%). Radiologists and cardiologists should be aware of relevant extracardiac findings that might require additional diagnostics or treatment.
PURPOSE: To assess the incidence of extracardiac findings in patients undergoing clinical cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) of the heart, and to determine the influence of those findings on patient management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During 40 months, 854 CMRI were performed at 1.5 T. Extracardiac findings were classified as significant (group A), if recommended for additional diagnostics or therapeutic interventions, and as nonsignificant (group B). RESULTS: The most frequent indication for CMRI was evaluation of cardiac stress ischemia. In all, 631 CMRI (74% of 854) showed no extracardiac pathologies. In the remaining 223 CMRI (26% of 854), a total of 286 extracardiac findings were detected. Among these findings, 49 were considered significant (group A) and 237 nonsignificant (group B). In group A, the most common findings were suspicious pulmonary nodules or masses. In group B, the most frequent findings were hepatic cysts or hemangiomas. Eight malignancies were observed with certainty at CMRI. Seven of them had been incidentally diagnosed on CMRI for the first time, and subsequently changed the patients' management. CONCLUSION: Extracardiac findings in clinically indicated CMRI are common (about 26%). Radiologists and cardiologists should be aware of relevant extracardiac findings that might require additional diagnostics or treatment.
Authors: Jan M Sohns; Jan Menke; Alexander Schwarz; Leonard Bergau; Johannes T Kowallick; Andreas Schuster; Frank Konietschke; Marius Placzek; Desiree Weiberg; Stefan Nordlohne; Sebastian Schmuck; Sebastian Schulz; Thorsten Derlin; Wieland Staab Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-04-27 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Felix C Sokolowski; Philipp Karius; Alejandra Rodríguez; Alexander Lembcke; Moritz Wagner; Bernd Hamm; Marc Dewey Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-04-30 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Vincent Dunet; Heloise Barras; Xavier Boulanger; Pierre Monney; Salah D Qanadli; Reto Meuli; Juerg Schwitter; Catherine Beigelman-Aubry Journal: Med Sci Monit Date: 2015-05-06
Authors: Jonathan C L Rodrigues; Stephen M Lyen; William Loughborough; Antonio Matteo Amadu; Anna Baritussio; Amardeep Ghosh Dastidar; Nathan E Manghat; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Elaine Rutherford; Jonathan R Weir-McCall; Rajan K Patel; J Graeme Houston; Giles Roditi; Allan D Struthers; Alan G Jardine; Patrick B Mark Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-04-07 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Matteo Gravina; Luca Pio Stoppino; Grazia Casavecchia; Angelo Pio Moffa; Roberta Vinci; Natale Daniele Brunetti; Matteo Di Biase; Luca Macarini Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2017-10-03 Impact factor: 3.411