Literature DB >> 2358926

A biomechanical analysis of the sliding hip screw: the question of plate angle.

R J Meislin1, J D Zuckerman, F J Kummer, V H Frankel.   

Abstract

There is general agreement that the implant of choice for intertrochanteric fractures is the sliding hip screw (SHS). However, considerable differences of opinion exist as to which plate angle--varying from 130 to 150 degrees--is preferred. Thus far there has been no cadaver-based biomechanical analysis of this problem. To examine these questions, we determined the effect of plate angle on plate strain and proximal medial femoral strain distribution in cadaver femurs fixed with 130, 135, 140, 145, and 150 degrees SHS after experimentally produced stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Twenty-four fresh adult cadaver femurs were assigned randomly to either the 130, 135, 140, 145, or 150 degrees SHS group. Each femur was radiographed and bone mineral density was determined by dual-photon absorptiometry. Multiple-strain gauges were affixed to the femur, with specific focus on the proximal femur and plate. Femurs were loaded at 25 degrees adduction in increments of 70 N from 0 to 1,800 N in a servohydraulic testing machine. Femurs were tested in a progressive manner: (a) intact femur; (b) intact femur with SHS inserted; (c) a stable two-part intertrochanteric fracture reduced with SHS; (d) a four-part fracture with the posteromedial fragment (PMF) reduced anatomically by a lag screw; (e) the same fracture with the PMF rotated 180 degrees and held in place by a lag screw to approximate a "near-anatomic" reduction; and (f) the same fracture with the PMF discarded. Screw sliding measurements were determined at regular intervals throughout each test.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2358926     DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199004020-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  3 in total

1.  Type of hip fracture determines load share in intramedullary osteosynthesis.

Authors:  Sebastian Eberle; Claus Gerber; Geert von Oldenburg; Sven Hungerer; Peter Augat
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Presence of a nail in the medullary canal; is it enough to prevent femoral neck shortening in trochanteric fracture?

Authors:  Hyung Keun Song; Han Kuk Yoon; Kyu Hyun Yang
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.759

3.  Critical factors in cut-out complication after Gamma Nail treatment of proximal femoral fractures.

Authors:  Alicja J Bojan; Claudia Beimel; Gilbert Taglang; David Collin; Carl Ekholm; Anders Jönsson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 2.362

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.