Literature DB >> 23589201

Rotation reveals the importance of configural cues in handwritten word perception.

Anthony S Barnhart1, Stephen D Goldinger.   

Abstract

A dramatic perceptual asymmetry occurs when handwritten words are rotated 90 ° in either direction. Those rotated in a direction consistent with their natural tilt (typically clockwise) become much more difficult to recognize, relative to those rotated in the opposite direction. In Experiment 1, we compared computer-printed and handwritten words, all equated for degrees of leftward and rightward tilt, and verified the phenomenon: The effect of rotation was far larger for cursive words, especially when they were rotated in a tilt-consistent direction. In Experiment 2, we replicated this pattern with all items being presented in visual noise. In both experiments, word frequency effects were larger for computer-printed words and did not interact with rotation. The results suggest that handwritten word perception requires greater configural processing, relative to computer print, because handwritten letters are variable and ambiguous. When words are rotated, configural processing suffers, particularly when rotation exaggerates the natural tilt. Our account is similar to theories of the "Thatcher illusion," wherein face inversion disrupts holistic processing. Together, the findings suggest that configural, word-level processing automatically increases when people read handwriting, as letter-level processing becomes less reliable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23589201      PMCID: PMC3748233          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0435-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  16 in total

1.  The lady's not for turning: rotation of the Thatcher illusion.

Authors:  M B Lewis
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Attending to a misoriented word causes the eyeball to rotate in the head.

Authors:  Harold Pashler; V S Ramachandran; Mark W Becker
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

3.  The arcsine is asinine: the analysis of proportions in ecology.

Authors:  David I Warton; Francis K C Hui
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  Reading rotated words.

Authors:  A Koriat; J Norman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The time to identify disoriented letters: effects of practice and font.

Authors:  P Jolicoeur; D Snow; J Murray
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1987-09

6.  On Thompson's inverted-face phenomenon (research note).

Authors:  I Rock
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Inversion and configuration of faces.

Authors:  J C Bartlett; J Searcy
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Optical illusions in invertions.

Authors:  T E Parks
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Word shape's in poor shape for the race to the lexicon.

Authors:  K R Paap; S L Newsome; R W Noel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Margaret Thatcher: a new illusion.

Authors:  P Thompson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  3 in total

1.  Does letter rotation slow down orthographic processing in word recognition?

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Ana Marcet; María Fernández-López
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

2.  Let's face it: reading acquisition, face and word processing.

Authors:  Paulo Ventura
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-23

3.  The Word Composite Effect Depends on Abstract Lexical Representations But Not Surface Features Like Case and Font.

Authors:  Paulo Ventura; Tânia Fernandes; Isabel Leite; Vítor B Almeida; Inês Casqueiro; Alan C-N Wong
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.