Literature DB >> 23589064

Joint line changes in cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty.

Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak1, Hee Nee Pang, Seng Jin Yeo, Mann Hong Tan, Ngai Nung Lo, Hwei Chi Chong.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study compared joint line changes and functional outcomes between cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) computer-navigated total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). With the increased precision offered by computer navigation, we hypothesized that there should be minimal differences in the joint line changes between the groups and thus no significant differences in the clinical outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of 195 patients with a minimum of 2-year follow-up following primary surgery was conducted. The patients were stratified into two groups: the CR group and the PS group. The joint line changes of both groups were then compared using the Student t test. Multivariate analysis and regression modelling were then utilized to analyze the functional outcomes of both groups.
RESULTS: CR knees had a significantly lesser mean joint line change of 1.70 mm as compared to 2.34 mm in PS knees (p = .04) but the absolute difference was only 0.64 mm. The PS group had significantly better final range of motion of 122° (±9.9°) as compared to 114° (±15.0°) in the CR group (p < .0001). There were no significant differences in the final outcome scores.
CONCLUSION: Although there is a significant difference statistically in the joint line changes between the groups, this difference is less than 1 mm and probably has no significant clinical impact. This is further affirmed by the fact that there was no significant difference in the clinical outcomes. The increased range seen in PS knees is probably not related to joint line changes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23589064     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-013-1738-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  3 in total

1.  The reversed gap technique produces anatomical alignment with less midflexion instability in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Georg Matziolis; Steffen Brodt; Christoph Windisch; Eric Roehner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Cruciate retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty after previous high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Jerry Yongqiang Chen; Ngai Nung Lo; Hwei Chi Chong; Hee Nee Pang; Darren Keng Jin Tay; Pak Lin Chin; Shi-Lu Chia; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-31       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The Imperial Joint Line Congruency Measurement is a valuable tool in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ravi Popat; Kieran Dhillon; Piyush Mahapatra; Hasaan Khan; Dinesh Nathwani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.