Literature DB >> 2358885

Single-unit selectivity to azimuthal direction and sound pressure level of noise bursts in cat high-frequency primary auditory cortex.

T J Imig1, W A Irons, F R Samson.   

Abstract

1. The azimuth and sound pressure level (SPL) selectivities of single-unit responses recorded in primary auditory cortex of barbiturate-anesthetized cats were studied by the use of broadband noise bursts delivered in the free field from a moveable loud-speaker. The experiments were carried out with cats located inside a quasianechoic sound-isolation chamber. We studied 71 units with relatively stable response properties. All units were located in the frequency representation between 5.8 and 31 kHz. The data obtained for each unit were displayed as an azimuth-level response area, a contour plot that displays the distribution of response magnitude as a joint function of SPL and azimuth at 0 degrees elevation. From these, azimuth and level functions were obtained to derive descriptors of azimuth and level selectivity. 2. Sensitivity to sound-source azimuth was assessed from the modulation of the average azimuth function (average of azimuth functions obtained to each SPL of noise that was presented) for each unit. The sample was arbitrarily divided into a high-directionality (HD) group (66%) whose average azimuth functions had modulation values of greater than or equal to 75% and a low-directionality (LD) group (34%). The distinction between HD and LD groups was made so that we could analyze the characteristics of units likely to be involved in the representation of sound-source azimuth. 3. There is an overrepresentation of the contralateral sound field and the midline in the sample of HD units. The preferred sector for each unit was defined as the range of azimuths within the frontal sound field throughout which unit response was greater than or equal to 75% of maximum. Each unit was classified as either midline preferring (17%, the midpoint of the preferred sector, i.e., best azimuth, was located within 5 degrees of the midline), contralateral preferring (60%), or ipsilateral preferring (23%). The ratio of contralateral- to ipsilateral-preferring units was 2.5:1. A higher proportion of units had best azimuths located in the 10 degrees sector centered on the midline than in any other 10 degrees sector of the frontal sound field. 4. In one animal, recordings were obtained at seven closely spaced sites in layer IV from single- and multiunit responses, which were narrowly tuned to both azimuth and SPL. The units located along a 1-mm length of an isofrequency strip were tuned to similar frequencies and SPLs but had five distinctly different directional preferences distributed throughout the entire frontal sound field.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2358885     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1990.63.6.1448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  39 in total

1.  Distributed representation of spectral and temporal information in rat primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  M P Kilgard; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Spatial processing in the auditory cortex of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  G H Recanzone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The coding of spatial location by single units in the lateral superior olive of the cat. I. Spatial receptive fields in azimuth.

Authors:  Daniel J Tollin; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Auditory space-time receptive field dynamics revealed by spherical white-noise analysis.

Authors:  R L Jenison; J W Schnupp; R A Reale; J F Brugge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Functional topography of cat primary auditory cortex: representation of tone intensity.

Authors:  C E Schreiner; J R Mendelson; M L Sutter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Inferring the role of inhibition in auditory processing of complex natural stimuli.

Authors:  Nadja Schinkel-Bielefeld; Stephen V David; Shihab A Shamma; Daniel A Butts
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Neuronal representations of distance in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Norbert Kopčo; Samantha Huang; John W Belliveau; Tommi Raij; Chinmayi Tengshe; Jyrki Ahveninen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Systematic representation of sound locations in the primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Khaleel A Razak
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Mechanisms underlying azimuth selectivity in the auditory cortex of the pallid bat.

Authors:  K A Razak
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Effects of sound level on fMRI activation in human brainstem, thalamic and cortical centers.

Authors:  Irina S Sigalovsky; Jennifer R Melcher
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.