Literature DB >> 23588711

Clinical implication of endoscopic gross appearance in early gastric cancer: revisited.

Da Hyun Jung1, Yoo Mi Park, Jie-Hyun Kim, Yong Chan Lee, Young Hoon Youn, Hyojin Park, Sang In Lee, Jong Won Kim, Seung Ho Choi, Woo Jin Hyung, Sung Hoon Noh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The macroscopic appearance of early gastric cancer (EGC) is known to reflect its growth patterns. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of the endoscopic appearance as a predictor of clinical behavior in EGC.
METHODS: Between January 2005 and December 2008, 1,845 patients were diagnosed with EGC and underwent surgery. The clinicopathologic characteristics were retrospectively analyzed according to gross appearance. Endoscopic findings were classified by predominant type as elevated, flat, or depressed. Flat and depressed types were categorized together as nonelevated type.
RESULTS: The proportions of elevated, flat, and depressed types were 16.6, 28.6, and 54.8 %. The gross appearance of the elevated type predominantly showed well/moderate differentiation, whereas the flat and depressed types showed signet-ring cells and poor differentiation, respectively. When the elevated and nonelevated types were compared, submucosal invasion, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and lymph-node metastasis (LNM) were higher in elevated than in nonelevated type. In differentiated EGC, submucosal invasion, LVI, LNM, and multiplicity were significantly higher in the elevated than the nonelevated type. These patterns were significantly common in the order elevated, depressed, and flat types. In undifferentiated EGC, submucosal invasion, LVI, and perineural invasion were significantly higher in elevated than in nonelevated type. These patterns were significantly common in the order elevated, depressed, and flat types. However, LNM was not significantly different based on gross appearance in undifferentiated EGC.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical behavior differs according to endoscopic appearance in EGC. The endoscopic appearance of EGC may facilitate prediction of clinical behavior, particularly in differentiated EGC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23588711     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-2947-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  19 in total

1.  JGCA (The Japan Gastric Cancer Association). Gastric cancer treatment guidelines.

Authors:  Y Shimada
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Additive lymph node dissection may be necessary in minute submucosal cancer of the stomach after endoscopic resection.

Authors:  Jie-Hyun Kim; Yong Chan Lee; Hyunki Kim; Sun Och Yoon; Hoguen Kim; Young Hoon Youn; Hyojin Park; Sang In Lee; Seung Ho Choi; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Endoscopic mucosal resection for early cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Roy Soetikno; Tonya Kaltenbach; Ronald Yeh; Takuji Gotoda
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-07-10       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Risk factors predictive of lymph node metastasis in depressed early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Nobutsugu Abe; Takashi Watanabe; Kazufumi Suzuki; Hiromichi Machida; Hiroshi Toda; Yuzo Nakaya; Tadahiko Masaki; Toshiyuki Mori; Masanori Sugiyama; Yutaka Atomi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Incidence of lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: estimation with a large number of cases at two large centers.

Authors:  Takuji Gotoda; Akio Yanagisawa; Mitsuru Sasako; Hiroyuki Ono; Yukihiro Nakanishi; Tadakazu Shimoda; Yo Kato
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.370

6.  Wider indications for the local resection of gastric cancer by adjacent lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  S Shimoyama; Y Seto; H Yasuda; M Kaminishi
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Characteristics of submucosal gastric carcinoma with lymph node metastatic disease.

Authors:  H J Son; S Y Song; S Kim; J H Noh; T S Sohn; D S Kim; J C Rhee
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.087

8.  Usefulness of magnifying endoscopy in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Y Otsuka; Y Niwa; N Ohmiya; N Ando; A Ohashi; Y Hirooka; H Goto
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer with submucosal invasion: analysis of a single institutional experience.

Authors:  Ji Yeong An; Yong Hae Baik; Min Gew Choi; Jae Hyung Noh; Tae Sung Sohn; Sung Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer with special reference to validation for curability criteria.

Authors:  O Goto; M Fujishiro; S Kodashima; S Ono; M Omata
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 10.093

View more
  9 in total

1.  Endoscopic predictors for undifferentiated histology in differentiated gastric neoplasms prior to endoscopic resection.

Authors:  Ji Min Choi; Sang Gyun Kim; Hyo-Joon Yang; Joo Hyun Lim; Jeongmin Choi; Jong Pil Im; Joo Sung Kim; Woo Ho Kim; Hyun Chae Jung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Clinical implication of endoscopic gross appearance in superficial esophageal squamous carcinoma: revisited.

Authors:  Cheal Wung Huh; Da Hyun Jung; Jie-Hyun Kim; Dae Won Ma; Young Hoon Youn; Hyojin Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Additive treatment improves survival in elderly patients after non-curative endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Da Hyun Jung; Yong Chan Lee; Jie-Hyun Kim; Sang Kil Lee; Sung Kwan Shin; Jun Chul Park; Hyunsoo Chung; Jae Jun Park; Young Hoon Youn; Hyojin Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer: do we have enough data to support this?

Authors:  Choong Nam Shim; Sang Kil Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  The Implications of Endoscopic Ulcer in Early Gastric Cancer: Can We Predict Clinical Behaviors from Endoscopy?

Authors:  Yoo Jin Lee; Jie-Hyun Kim; Jae Jun Park; Young Hoon Youn; Hyojin Park; Jong Won Kim; Seung Ho Choi; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Risk factors for early metachronous tumor development after endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jae Yong Park; Sang Gyun Kim; Jung Kim; Seung Jun Han; Sooyeon Oh; Ji Min Choi; Joo Hyun Lim; Hyunsoo Chung; Hyun Chae Jung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Improving the Endoscopic Detection Rate in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Hee Seok Moon
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2015-07-24

8.  The longest diameter of tumor as a parameter of endoscopic resection in early gastric cancer: In comparison with tumor area.

Authors:  Yoo Jin Um; Hae Won Kim; Da Hyun Jung; Jie-Hyun Kim; Jae Jun Park; Young Hoon Youn; Hyojin Park; Jong Won Kim; Seung Ho Choi; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Reliability of Paris Classification for superficial neoplastic gastric lesions improves with training and narrow band imaging.

Authors:  Helena Ribeiro; Diogo Libânio; Rui Castro; Anibal Ferreira; Pedro Barreiro; Pedro Boal Carvalho; Tiago Capela; Pedro Pimentel-Nunes; Cristina Santos; Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-05-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.