Literature DB >> 23588481

Women's water polo world championships: technical and tactical aspects of winning and losing teams in close and unbalanced games.

Corrado Lupo1, Giancarlo Condello, Laura Capranica, Antonio Tessitore.   

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the technical and tactical aspects between winning and losing teams in close (i.e., 1-3 goals of difference) and unbalanced (i.e., >3 goals of difference) elite women's water polo games. A notational analysis was performed on 45 games to evaluate occurrence of action, mean duration, action outcome, origin and execution of shot, offensive and defensive role, and arrangement of even, counterattack, power play, and transition situations. Independent 2-sided t-tests were applied to show differences (p < 0.05) between teams. Regarding close games, effects emerged for action outcome (counterattack: lost possessions; power play: goals, no goal shots), origin (even: zone 1, zone 4; counterattack: zone 1, zone 5) and execution (even: off-the-water shots; counterattack: shots after > than 2 fakes; power play: drive shots) of shots, offensive even arrangements (6 vs. 6/5 vs. 5; 2 vs. 2/1 vs. 1), and role. Regarding unbalanced games, differences emerged for the occurrence of action (even, counterattack), duration (even; power play), action outcome (even: goals, penalties; counterattack: goals, no goal shots, penalties; power play: goals, no goal shots; transition: lost possessions), origin (even: zone 2, zone 4; counterattack: zone 5) and execution (even: free throws, drive shots; counterattack: drive shots, shots after > 2 fakes; power play: drive shots, shots after 1 fake) of shots; offensive even arrangements (2 vs. 2/1 vs. 1), and role; and defensive even arrangements (pressing, zones 1-2, zone M, zones 2-3-4). Differences between close and unbalanced games underlining that water polo performance should be analyzed in relation to specific margins of victory. Therefore, water polo coaches and physical trainers can plan a sound training session according to the most important aspects of close (opponent's exclusion, center forward play, and power play actions) and unbalanced (defensive skills) games.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23588481     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182955d90

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  6 in total

1.  Physiological responses of water-polo players under different tactical strategie.

Authors:  Petros G Botonis; Argyris G Toubekis; Theodoros I Platanou
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Performance Assessment in Water Polo Using Compositional Data Analysis.

Authors:  Enrique García Ordóñez; María Del Carmen Iglesias Pérez; Carlos Touriño González
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 2.193

3.  The Effects of Modifying the Distance of the Penalty Shot in Water Polo.

Authors:  Francisco Manuel Argudo; Roberto Ruiz-Barquín; Pablo José Borges
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 2.193

4.  The Functional Test for Agility Performance is a Reliable Quick Decision-Making Test for Skilled Water Polo Players.

Authors:  Guilherme Tucher; Flávio Antônio de Souza Castro; António José Rocha Martins da Silva; Nuno Domingos Garrido
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 2.193

5.  Determinants of the effectiveness of fast break actions in elite and sub-elite Italian men's basketball games.

Authors:  D Conte; T G Favero; M Niederhausen; L Capranica; A Tessitore
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 2.806

6.  Water Polo Shooting Performance: Differences Between World Championship Winning, Drawing and Losing Teams.

Authors:  Sofia Canossa; José Arturo Abraldes; Luísa Estriga; Ricardo J Fernandes; Júlio Garganta
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 2.193

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.