IMPORTANCE: Hexanucleotide repeat expansions in the chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72) gene underlie a significant fraction of frontotemporal dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency of C9orf72 repeat expansions in clinically diagnosed late-onset Alzheimer disease (AD). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: This case-control study genotyped the C9orf72 repeat expansion in 872 unrelated familial AD cases and 888 control subjects recruited as part of the National Institute on Aging Late-Onset Alzheimer Disease Family Study cohort, a multisite collaboration studying 1000 families with 2 or more individuals clinically diagnosed as having late-onset AD. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We determined the presence or absence of the C9orf72 repeat expansion by repeat-primed polymerase chain reaction, the length of the longest nonexpanded allele, segregation of the genotype with disease, and clinical features of repeat expansion carriers. RESULTS Three families showed large C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansions. Two additional families carried more than 30 repeats. Segregation with disease could be demonstrated in 3 families. One affected expansion carrier had neuropathology compatible with AD. In the National Institute on Aging Late-Onset Alzheimer Disease Family Study series, the C9orf72 repeat expansions constituted the second most common pathogenic mutation, just behind the PSEN1 A79V mutation, highlighting the heterogeneity of clinical presentations associated with repeat expansions. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: C9orf72 repeat expansions explain a small proportion of patients with a clinical presentation indistinguishable from AD, and they highlight the necessity of screening frontotemporal dementia genes in clinical AD cases with strong family history.
IMPORTANCE: Hexanucleotide repeat expansions in the chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72) gene underlie a significant fraction of frontotemporal dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency of C9orf72 repeat expansions in clinically diagnosed late-onset Alzheimer disease (AD). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: This case-control study genotyped the C9orf72 repeat expansion in 872 unrelated familial AD cases and 888 control subjects recruited as part of the National Institute on Aging Late-Onset Alzheimer Disease Family Study cohort, a multisite collaboration studying 1000 families with 2 or more individuals clinically diagnosed as having late-onset AD. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We determined the presence or absence of the C9orf72 repeat expansion by repeat-primed polymerase chain reaction, the length of the longest nonexpanded allele, segregation of the genotype with disease, and clinical features of repeat expansion carriers. RESULTS Three families showed large C9orf72hexanucleotide repeat expansions. Two additional families carried more than 30 repeats. Segregation with disease could be demonstrated in 3 families. One affected expansion carrier had neuropathology compatible with AD. In the National Institute on Aging Late-Onset Alzheimer Disease Family Study series, the C9orf72 repeat expansions constituted the second most common pathogenic mutation, just behind the PSEN1A79V mutation, highlighting the heterogeneity of clinical presentations associated with repeat expansions. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: C9orf72 repeat expansions explain a small proportion of patients with a clinical presentation indistinguishable from AD, and they highlight the necessity of screening frontotemporal dementia genes in clinical AD cases with strong family history.
Authors: L A Reed; T J Grabowski; M L Schmidt; J C Morris; A Goate; A Solodkin; G W Van Hoesen; R L Schelper; C J Talbot; M A Wragg; J Q Trojanowski Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 1997-10 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: L Berg; D W McKeel; J P Miller; M Storandt; E H Rubin; J C Morris; J Baty; M Coats; J Norton; A M Goate; J L Price; M Gearing; S S Mirra; A M Saunders Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 1998-03
Authors: N Brouwers; K Sleegers; S Engelborghs; S Maurer-Stroh; I Gijselinck; J van der Zee; B A Pickut; M Van den Broeck; M Mattheijssens; K Peeters; J Schymkowitz; F Rousseau; J-J Martin; M Cruts; P P De Deyn; C Van Broeckhoven Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-06-18 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: S G Lindquist; I E Holm; M Schwartz; I Law; J Stokholm; M Batbayli; G Waldemar; J E Nielsen Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2008-02-16 Impact factor: 6.089
Authors: Nathalie Brouwers; Karen Nuytemans; Julie van der Zee; Ilse Gijselinck; Sebastiaan Engelborghs; Jessie Theuns; Samir Kumar-Singh; Barbara A Pickut; Philippe Pals; Bart Dermaut; Veerle Bogaerts; Tim De Pooter; Sally Serneels; Marleen Van den Broeck; Ivy Cuijt; Maria Mattheijssens; Karin Peeters; Raf Sciot; Jean-Jacques Martin; Patrick Cras; Patrick Santens; Rik Vandenberghe; Peter P De Deyn; Marc Cruts; Christine Van Broeckhoven; Kristel Sleegers Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2007-10
Authors: A C Ludolph; J Kassubek; B G Landwehrmeyer; E Mandelkow; E-M Mandelkow; D J Burn; D Caparros-Lefebvre; K A Frey; J G de Yebenes; T Gasser; P Heutink; G Höglinger; Z Jamrozik; K A Jellinger; A Kazantsev; H Kretzschmar; A E Lang; I Litvan; J J Lucas; P L McGeer; S Melquist; W Oertel; M Otto; D Paviour; T Reum; A Saint-Raymond; J C Steele; M Tolnay; H Tumani; J C van Swieten; M T Vanier; J-P Vonsattel; S Wagner; Z K Wszolek Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 6.089
Authors: F Cortini; C Fenoglio; I Guidi; E Venturelli; S Pomati; A Marcone; D Scalabrini; C Villa; F Clerici; E Dalla Valle; C Mariani; S Cappa; N Bresolin; E Scarpini; D Galimberti Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2008-08-26 Impact factor: 6.089
Authors: Rosa Rademakers; Matt Baker; Jennifer Gass; Jennifer Adamson; Edward D Huey; Parastoo Momeni; Salvatore Spina; Giovanni Coppola; Anna M Karydas; Heather Stewart; Nancy Johnson; Ging-Yuek Hsiung; Brendan Kelley; Karen Kuntz; Ellen Steinbart; Elisabeth McCarty Wood; Chang-En Yu; Keith Josephs; Eric Sorenson; Kyle B Womack; Sandra Weintraub; Stuart M Pickering-Brown; Peter R Schofield; William S Brooks; Vivianna M Van Deerlin; Julie Snowden; Christopher M Clark; Andrew Kertesz; Kevin Boylan; Bernardino Ghetti; David Neary; Gerard D Schellenberg; Thomas G Beach; Marsel Mesulam; David Mann; Jordan Grafman; Ian R Mackenzie; Howard Feldman; Thomas Bird; Ron Petersen; David Knopman; Bradley Boeve; Dan H Geschwind; Bruce Miller; Zbigniew Wszolek; Carol Lippa; Eileen H Bigio; Dennis Dickson; Neill Graff-Radford; Mike Hutton Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Lei Yu; Lori B Chibnik; Gyan P Srivastava; Nathalie Pochet; Jingyun Yang; Jishu Xu; James Kozubek; Nikolaus Obholzer; Sue E Leurgans; Julie A Schneider; Alexander Meissner; Philip L De Jager; David A Bennett Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Joshua T Geiger; Karissa C Arthur; Ted M Dawson; Liana S Rosenthal; Alexander Pantelyat; Marilyn Albert; Argye E Hillis; Barbara Crain; Olga Pletnikova; Juan C Troncoso; Sonja W Scholz Journal: Neurodegener Dis Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 2.977
Authors: Carlos Cruchaga; Jorge L Del-Aguila; Benjamin Saef; Kathleen Black; Maria Victoria Fernandez; John Budde; Laura Ibanez; Yuetiva Deming; Manav Kapoor; Giuseppe Tosto; Richard P Mayeux; David M Holtzman; Anne M Fagan; John C Morris; Randall J Bateman; Alison M Goate; Oscar Harari Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Elaine Y Liu; Jenny Russ; Kathryn Wu; Donald Neal; Eunran Suh; Anna G McNally; David J Irwin; Vivianna M Van Deerlin; Edward B Lee Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2014-05-08 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Karen Nuytemans; Vanessa Inchausti; Gary W Beecham; Liyong Wang; Dennis W Dickson; John Q Trojanowski; Virginia M-Y Lee; Deborah C Mash; Matthew P Frosch; Tatiana M Foroud; Lawrence S Honig; Thomas J Montine; Ted M Dawson; Eden R Martin; William K Scott; Jeffery M Vance Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Matthew B Harms; Janet Cady; Craig Zaidman; Paul Cooper; Taha Bali; Peggy Allred; Carlos Cruchaga; Michael Baughn; Ryan T Libby; Alan Pestronk; Alison Goate; John Ravits; Robert H Baloh Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 4.673