Literature DB >> 2358817

The use of a hip score for evaluation of the results of total hip arthroplasty.

M A Ritter1, R W Fechtman, E M Keating, P M Faris.   

Abstract

Both the Harris and the Charnley hip evaluation forms were applied to 191 ingrowth-type total hip arthroplasties in an attempt to determine the effectiveness of the hip score as an indicator of success following arthroplasty. The Harris form demonstrated significantly lower pain scores than the Charnley form and, consequently, failed patients more often due to pain. However, it is important to note that 32% of the hips that failed due to pain on the Harris form did not fail due to total score. This inconsistency prompts the authors to state that when using a hip form to evaluate the performance of a prosthesis, especially one of the ingrowth type, it is important to consider not only the average total score but also the percentage of patients still experiencing significant pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2358817     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(06)80239-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  2 in total

1.  A scoring system to determine radiological loosening in cemented total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D M Dall; I D Learmonth; M Solomon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The cement-in-cement technique is a reliable option in hip arthroplasty revision surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Francisco Xará-Leite; Ana Daniela Pereira; Renato Andrade; André Sarmento; Ricardo Sousa; Olufemi R Ayeni; João Espregueira-Mendes; Daniel Soares
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-07-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.