Literature DB >> 23587630

A prospective, randomized, crossover, multicenter study comparing quality of life using compact versus standard catheters for intermittent self-catheterization.

Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler1, Gérard Amarenco, Lena Lindbo, Irina Soljanik, Heidi Lunde Andersen, Per Bagi, Kristine Gjødsbøl, Burkhard Domurath.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Intermittent catheterization is the recommended standard treatment for neurogenic bladder dysfunction. However, standard intermittent catheters can be unwieldy, difficult to use and carry discreetly. This can influence patient ability to perform catheterization efficiently, discreetly and privately, therefore, affecting patient quality of life. We evaluated whether the discreet design of the compact catheter would improve quality of life in intermittent catheterization users compared with standard catheters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a nonblinded, randomized, multicenter, 2-way crossover study with 2 treatment periods of 6 weeks ± 3 days. A total of 125 patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction were included in the study from 17 study sites, including 7 in France, 3 each in Germany, Denmark and Sweden, and 1 in Norway. Quality of life was evaluated by the intermittent self-catheterization questionnaire. The difference in questionnaire scores between the compact catheter and standard hydrophilic coated catheters was analyzed using a mixed linear normal model.
RESULTS: The intermittent catheterization questionnaire score increased significantly due to compact catheter use. We noted an estimated mean difference of 17.0 between the compact and standard intermittent catheters (p <0.001), corresponding to a 28% increase. The primary study results were further supported by the positive results of the secondary objective of preference, that is 63% of patients preferred the compact catheter.
CONCLUSIONS: The discreet design of the compact catheter significantly improved patient quality of life related to intermittent self-catheterization.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AE; ISC; ISC questionnaire; ISC-Q; ITT; VAS; adverse event; catheters; intent to treat; intermittent self-catheterization; intermittent urethral catheterization; quality of life; questionnaires; urethra; visual analog scale

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23587630     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  8 in total

1.  Canadian Urological Association Best Practice Report: Catheter use.

Authors:  Lysanne Campeau; Samer Shamout; Richard J Baverstock; Kevin V Carlson; Dean S Elterman; Duane R Hickling; Stephen S Steele; Blayne Welk
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Catheters for intermittent catheterization: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Donghui Ye; Yuntian Chen; Zhongyu Jian; Banghua Liao; Xi Jin; Liyuan Xiang; Hong Li; Kunjie Wang
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 3.  WITHDRAWN: Intermittent catheterisation for long-term bladder management.

Authors:  Jacqui Prieto; Catherine L Murphy; Katherine N Moore; Mandy Fader
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-08

Review 4.  Outcome comparison of different approaches to self-intermittent catheterization in neurogenic patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Shamout; X Biardeau; J Corcos; L Campeau
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 5.  Intermittent catheter techniques, strategies and designs for managing long-term bladder conditions.

Authors:  Jacqui A Prieto; Catherine L Murphy; Fiona Stewart; Mandy Fader
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-26

6.  Patient preferences and willingness to pay for innovations in intermittent self-catheters.

Authors:  Binny Pinder; Andrew J Lloyd; Beenish Nafees; Eric P Elkin; Jerome Marley
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 2.711

7.  Gains in health utility associated with urinary catheter innovations.

Authors:  Andrei Krassioukov; Yasuhiko Igawa; Márcio Augusto Averbeck; Helmut Madersbacher; Andrew J Lloyd; Mette Bøgelund; Nikesh Thiruchelvam
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2018-10-01

8.  User perception of a new hydrophilic-coated male urinary catheter for intermittent use.

Authors:  Ingrid Koeter; Gro Stensröd; Aud Hunsbedt Nilsen; Rigmor Lund; Colette Haslam; Marianne De Sèze; Rajagopalan Sriram; John Heesakkers
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2018-09-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.