Literature DB >> 23587467

The impact of incomplete revascularization and angiographic patency on midterm results after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Jota Nakano1, Hitoshi Okabayashi2, Hisashi Noma3, Tosiya Sato3, Ryuzo Sakata4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Higher rates of incomplete revascularization (IR) and reduced patency are possible drawbacks of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB); both may adversely affect outcome after surgery. This study was conducted to shed light on the relationships among IR, angiographic patency, and midterm results after OPCAB surgery.
METHODS: A total of 1604 consecutive patients underwent OPCAB during a 6-year period; 1581 patients (95%) underwent systematic postoperative angiography. Complete follow-up was achieved in 99.5% (median, 3.2 years; up to 6.5 years). A total of 216 patients had IR (13%), and 225 had at least 1 graft failure (FitzGibbon B or O).
RESULTS: All the event-free survival rates for all-cause mortality (P < .001), cardiac death (P = .020), and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (P < .001) were lower in the IR group. By using the Cox proportional hazards model, IR was an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-2.81). Of those who underwent postoperative angiography, the patients with graft failure experienced reintervention more frequently than those with all grafts patent (HR, 5.49; 95% CI, 3.43-8.77). Even with excluding patients who had undergone reintervention immediately after angiography, graft failure was still an independent risk factor for reintervention afterwards (HR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.30-4.47).
CONCLUSIONS: Incomplete revascularization was relevant to higher midterm mortality after OPCAB, whereas the risk of reintervention was higher for patients with occluded grafts. Complete revascularization, coupled with achievement of a higher patency rate, could be expected to improve follow-up outcomes after OPCAB surgery.
Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23587467     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.03.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  3 in total

Review 1.  Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Christian H Møller; Daniel A Steinbrüchel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting; is it Still Relevant?

Authors:  Chima K P Ofoegbu; Rodgers M Manganyi
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2022

Review 3.  On pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus off pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a review.

Authors:  Muhammad Shahzeb Khan; Mohammad Yousuf-Ul Islam; Muhammad Umer Ahmed; Faizan Imran Bawany; Asadullah Khan; Mohammad Hussham Arshad
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2014-03-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.