Literature DB >> 23587245

Parental epigenetic asymmetry in mammals.

Rachel Duffié1, Déborah Bourc'his.   

Abstract

The early mammalian embryo is marked by genome-wide parental epigenetic asymmetries, which are directly inherited from the sperm and the oocyte, but are also amplified a few hours after fertilization. The yin-yang of these complementary parental programs is essential for proper development, as uniparental embryos are not viable. The majority of these parental asymmetries are erased, as the embryonic genome assumes its own chromatin signature toward pluripotency and then differentiation, reducing the risk for haploinsufficiency. At a few loci, however, parent-of-origin information persists through development, via maintenance and protective complexes. In this review, we discuss the parental asymmetries that are inherited from the gametes, the forces involved in their elimination, reinforcement or protection, and how this influences the embryonic program. We highlight the gradual loss of all parental asymmetries occurring throughout development, except at imprinted loci, which maintain distinct parent-of-origin chromatin and transcriptional characteristics for life. A deeper understanding of the nongenetic contributions of each germline is important to provide insight into the origin of non-Mendelian inheritance of phenotypic traits, as well as the risk of incompatibilities between parental genomes.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23587245     DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-416027-9.00009-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol        ISSN: 0070-2153            Impact factor:   4.897


  7 in total

Review 1.  Epigenesis and plasticity of mouse trophoblast stem cells.

Authors:  Julie Prudhomme; Céline Morey
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Maternal-to-zygotic transition as a potential target for niclosamide during early embryogenesis.

Authors:  Sara M F Vliet; Subham Dasgupta; Nicole R L Sparks; Jay S Kirkwood; Alyssa Vollaro; Manhoi Hur; Nicole I Zur Nieden; David C Volz
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  Allele-specific H3K9me3 and DNA methylation co-marked CpG-rich regions serve as potential imprinting control regions in pre-implantation embryo.

Authors:  Hui Yang; Dandan Bai; Yanhe Li; Zhaowei Yu; Chenfei Wang; Yifan Sheng; Wenqiang Liu; Shaorong Gao; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 28.213

4.  H2AK119ub1 guides maternal inheritance and zygotic deposition of H3K27me3 in mouse embryos.

Authors:  Hailiang Mei; Azusa Inoue; Chisayo Kozuka; Ryoya Hayashi; Mami Kumon; Haruhiko Koseki
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  A reporter model to visualize imprinting stability at the Dlk1 locus during mouse development and in pluripotent cells.

Authors:  Emily Swanzey; Matthias Stadtfeld
Journal:  Development       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 6.868

6.  The Gpr1/Zdbf2 locus provides new paradigms for transient and dynamic genomic imprinting in mammals.

Authors:  Rachel Duffié; Sophie Ajjan; Maxim V Greenberg; Natasha Zamudio; Martin Escamilla del Arenal; Julian Iranzo; Ikuhiro Okamoto; Sandrine Barbaux; Patricia Fauque; Déborah Bourc'his
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Antagonist Xist and Tsix co-transcription during mouse oogenesis and maternal Xist expression during pre-implantation development calls into question the nature of the maternal imprint on the X chromosome.

Authors:  Jane Lynda Deuve; Amélie Bonnet-Garnier; Nathalie Beaujean; Philip Avner; Céline Morey
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.528

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.