Literature DB >> 23586454

Developmental trends and individual differences in brain systems involved in intertemporal choice during adolescence.

Marie T Banich1, Alejandro De La Vega, Jessica R Andrews-Hanna, Kristen Mackiewicz Seghete, Yiping Du, Eric D Claus.   

Abstract

This study used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine the neural systems activated during an intertemporal choice task in a group of 14- to 19-year-old adolescents, as well as the relationship of such activation patterns to individual differences in the self-reported ability to engage in nonimmediate thinking (i.e., less impulsive and more future-oriented thoughts and action). With increasing age, there was greater differentiation between patterns of brain activity for immediate versus future choices across three distinct brain systems involved in intertemporal choice--those involved in exerting control over behavior, attributing affective value to choices, and imagining future outcomes. Furthermore, a greater propensity toward self-reported nonimmediate thinking was associated with decreased activity in the systems involved in cognitive control, possibly suggesting that individuals with greater self-reported nonimmediate thinking need to rely less on cognitive control regions during conditions of intertemporal choice. These results highlight the role that both developmental age and individual differences play in influencing neural systems involved in intertemporal choice. Implications for understanding the onset of substance abuse disorders during adolescence are discussed. 2013 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23586454     DOI: 10.1037/a0031991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav        ISSN: 0893-164X


  9 in total

1.  Living in the Now: Decision-Making and Delay Discounting in Adolescent Gamblers.

Authors:  Giovanna Nigro; Marina Cosenza
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2016-12

2.  Risk-Taking, Delay Discounting, and Time Perspective in Adolescent Gamblers: An Experimental Study.

Authors:  Marina Cosenza; Mark D Griffiths; Giovanna Nigro; Maria Ciccarelli
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2017-06

3.  Decline of prefrontal cortical-mediated executive functions but attenuated delay discounting in aged Fischer 344 × brown Norway hybrid rats.

Authors:  Caesar M Hernandez; Lauren M Vetere; Caitlin A Orsini; Joseph A McQuail; Andrew P Maurer; Sara N Burke; Barry Setlow; Jennifer L Bizon
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.673

4.  The Observed Longitudinal Relationship between Future Orientation and Substance Use Among a Cohort of Youth with Serious Criminal Offenses.

Authors:  Merrian Brooks; Elizabeth Miller; Kaleab Abebe; Edward Mulvey
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.164

5.  Neuroimaging mechanisms of change in psychotherapy for addictive behaviors: emerging translational approaches that bridge biology and behavior.

Authors:  Sarah W Feldstein Ewing; Tammy Chung
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2013-06

6.  Family Functioning as a Mediator of Relations between Family History of Substance Use Disorder and Impulsivity.

Authors:  Stacy R Ryan; Carly K Friedman; Yuanyuan Liang; Sarah L Lake; Charles W Mathias; Nora E Charles; Ashley Acheson; Donald M Dougherty
Journal:  Addict Disord Their Treat       Date:  2015-04-30

7.  Age-related changes in the temporal dynamics of executive control: a study in 5- and 6-year-old children.

Authors:  Joanna Lucenet; Agnès Blaye
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-29

8.  Individual differences in functional brain connectivity predict temporal discounting preference in the transition to adolescence.

Authors:  Jeya Anandakumar; Kathryn L Mills; Eric A Earl; Lourdes Irwin; Oscar Miranda-Dominguez; Damion V Demeter; Alexandra Walton-Weston; Sarah Karalunas; Joel Nigg; Damien A Fair
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 6.464

9.  The effect of state self-control on the intertemporal decisions made by individuals with high and low trait self-control.

Authors:  Yuan Guan; Jiamei He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.