BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Drug interference with normal hERG protein trafficking substantially reduces the channel density in the plasma membrane and thereby poses an arrhythmic threat. The chemical substructures important for hERG trafficking inhibition were investigated using pentamidine as a model drug. Furthermore, the relationship between acute ion channel block and correction of trafficking by dofetilide was studied. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: hERG and K(IR)2.1 trafficking in HEK293 cells was evaluated by Western blot and immunofluorescence microscopy after treatment with pentamidine and six pentamidine analogues, and correction with dofetilide and four dofetilide analogues that displayed different abilities to inhibit IKr . Molecular dynamics simulations were used to address mode, number and type of interactions between hERG and dofetilide analogues. KEY RESULTS: Structural modifications of pentamidine differentially affected plasma membrane levels of hERG and K(IR)2.1. Modification of the phenyl ring or substituents directly attached to it had the largest effect, affirming the importance of these chemical residues in ion channel binding. PA-4 had the mildest effects on both ion channels. Dofetilide corrected pentamidine-induced hERG, but not K(IR)2.1 trafficking defects. Dofetilide analogues that displayed high channel affinity, mediated by pi-pi stacks and hydrophobic interactions, also restored hERG protein levels, whereas analogues with low affinity were ineffective. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Drug-induced trafficking defects can be minimized if certain chemical features are avoided or 'synthesized out'; this could influence the design and development of future drugs. Further analysis of such features in hERG trafficking correctors may facilitate the design of a non-blocking corrector for trafficking defective hERG proteins in both congenital and acquired LQTS.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Drug interference with normal hERG protein trafficking substantially reduces the channel density in the plasma membrane and thereby poses an arrhythmic threat. The chemical substructures important for hERG trafficking inhibition were investigated using pentamidine as a model drug. Furthermore, the relationship between acute ion channel block and correction of trafficking by dofetilide was studied. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: hERG and K(IR)2.1 trafficking in HEK293 cells was evaluated by Western blot and immunofluorescence microscopy after treatment with pentamidine and six pentamidine analogues, and correction with dofetilide and four dofetilide analogues that displayed different abilities to inhibit IKr . Molecular dynamics simulations were used to address mode, number and type of interactions between hERG and dofetilide analogues. KEY RESULTS: Structural modifications of pentamidine differentially affected plasma membrane levels of hERG and K(IR)2.1. Modification of the phenyl ring or substituents directly attached to it had the largest effect, affirming the importance of these chemical residues in ion channel binding. PA-4 had the mildest effects on both ion channels. Dofetilide corrected pentamidine-induced hERG, but not K(IR)2.1 trafficking defects. Dofetilide analogues that displayed high channel affinity, mediated by pi-pi stacks and hydrophobic interactions, also restored hERG protein levels, whereas analogues with low affinity were ineffective. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Drug-induced trafficking defects can be minimized if certain chemical features are avoided or 'synthesized out'; this could influence the design and development of future drugs. Further analysis of such features in hERG trafficking correctors may facilitate the design of a non-blocking corrector for trafficking defective hERG proteins in both congenital and acquired LQTS.
Authors: W Haverkamp; G Breithardt; A J Camm; M J Janse; M R Rosen; C Antzelevitch; D Escande; M Franz; M Malik; A Moss; R Shah Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Corey L Anderson; Brian P Delisle; Blake D Anson; Jennifer A Kilby; Melissa L Will; David J Tester; Qiuming Gong; Zhengfeng Zhou; Michael J Ackerman; Craig T January Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-01-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: S K Jones; J E Hall; M A Allen; S D Morrison; K A Ohemeng; V V Reddy; J D Geratz; R R Tidwell Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 1990-06 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Eckhard Ficker; Yuri A Kuryshev; Adrienne T Dennis; Carlos Obejero-Paz; Lu Wang; Peter Hawryluk; Barbara A Wible; Arthur M Brown Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Teresa Żołek; Muge Qile; Paweł Kaźmierczak; Meye Bloothooft; Marcel A G van der Heyden; Dorota Maciejewska Journal: RSC Adv Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 3.361
Authors: Yuan Ji; Marlieke G Veldhuis; Jantien Zandvoort; Fee L Romunde; Marien J C Houtman; Karen Duran; Gijs van Haaften; Eva-Maria Zangerl-Plessl; Hiroki Takanari; Anna Stary-Weinzinger; Marcel A G van der Heyden Journal: J Biomed Sci Date: 2017-07-15 Impact factor: 12.771
Authors: Yuan Ji; Hiroki Takanari; Muge Qile; Lukas Nalos; Marien J C Houtman; Fee L Romunde; Raimond Heukers; Paul M P van Bergen En Henegouwen; Marc A Vos; Marcel A G van der Heyden Journal: J Cell Mol Med Date: 2017-04-19 Impact factor: 5.310
Authors: Márcia Vagos; Ilsbeth G M van Herck; Joakim Sundnes; Hermenegild J Arevalo; Andrew G Edwards; Jussi T Koivumäki Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2018-09-04 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Carlos A Obejero-Paz; Andrew Bruening-Wright; James Kramer; Peter Hawryluk; Milos Tatalovic; Howard C Dittrich; Arthur M Brown Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Laura van der Schoor; Emma J van Hattum; Sophie M de Wilde; Netanja I Harlianto; Aart-Jan van Weert; Meye Bloothooft; Marcel A G van der Heyden Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-08-11 Impact factor: 5.923