Literature DB >> 2358577

Effect of cerumen removal on the hearing ability of geriatric patients.

C Lewis-Cullinan1, J K Janken.   

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to estimate the prevalence of impacted cerumen in a population of hospitalized elderly patients, and to evaluate the effect of cerumen removal in reversing hearing impairment. The design was a pre-test/post-test static-group comparison. Over a 1-year period, a random sample (n = 226) was drawn every third day from daily admission lists of English-speaking patients aged 65 or older, admitted to non-intensive care units of one hospital. On either the second or third day of hospital stay, subjects were given a hearing test using an AudioScope and then their ear canals were examined for impacted cerumen. Ear canal irrigations were performed on those subjects with impacted cerumen. All subjects received a second hearing test. Results indicate that impacted cerumen is a common condition in the hospitalized elderly. Thirty-five per cent of the sample had impacted cerumen, 19.9% bilaterally and 15.0% unilaterally. Furthermore, removal of cerumen significantly improved hearing ability. Improved hearing scores were obtained in 75.0% of the ears after the impacted cerumen was removed, with subjects hearing from one to three more tones per ear on the second hearing test. An analysis of variance for repeated measures on hearing was computed to test for the effect of removing cerumen from individuals who had neither, one or both ears occluded. A significant interaction (F = 146.83, d.f. = 2/223, P less than 0.0001) between hearing tests and cerumen removal was found indicating that those with no occlusion had no change in hearing whereas both occluded groups increased with the greatest change for the bilateral group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2358577     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1990.tb01859.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  9 in total

Review 1.  Ear wax.

Authors:  George G G Browning
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-01-25

Review 2.  Ear wax.

Authors:  Tony Wright
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2015-03-04

3.  Sensory impairment in hip-fracture patients 65 years or older and effects of hearing/vision interventions on fall frequency.

Authors:  Else V Grue; Marit Kirkevold; Petter Mowinchel; Anette H Ranhoff
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2008-11-06

4.  Improvement in hearing after chiropractic care: a case series.

Authors:  Joseph O Di Duro
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2006-01-19

5.  Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a novel product for the removal of impacted human cerumen.

Authors:  Douglas Fullington; Jenny Song; Antionette Gilles; Xiaowen Guo; Waley Hua; C Eric Anderson; Joseph Griffin
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2017-06-02

6.  Banji's test: A new diagnostic test of ear wax impaction.

Authors:  Oyebanji A Olajuyin
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec

Review 7.  WITHDRAWN: Ear drops for the removal of ear wax.

Authors:  Martin J Burton; Carolyn Doree
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-07-24

8.  Does Hearing Aid Use Increase the Likelihood of Cerumen Impaction?

Authors:  Vinaya Manchaiah; Jonathan Arthur; Huw Williams
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2015-12-18

9.  Comparative implementation-effectiveness of three strategies to perform hearing screening among older adults in primary care clinics: study design and protocol.

Authors:  Janet Prvu Bettger; Rowena J Dolor; David L Witsell; Judy R Dubno; Carl F Pieper; Amy R Walker; Mina Silberberg; Kristine A Schulz; Pranab Majumder; Erika Juhlin; Sherri L Smith; Howard W Francis; Debara L Tucci
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.921

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.